Behavioural Surveillance Surveys - The Wisdom of Whores
Behavioural Surveillance Surveys - The Wisdom of Whores
Behavioural Surveillance Surveys - The Wisdom of Whores
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>The</strong> following is one example <strong>of</strong> how to<br />
calculate the 95 percent confidence interval<br />
from the above data.<br />
Male STD patients: n = 435, p = 15.<br />
95% CI = 15 ± 1.96 * √(15*85)<br />
= 15 ± 3.36<br />
95% CI = 11.6 - 18.4<br />
√435<br />
From these data, it appears that condom<br />
use during the most recent commercial sex act<br />
is relatively low among male STI patients in<br />
Tamil Nadu, and since the sample size is large,<br />
this can be asserted with some degree <strong>of</strong><br />
confidence. It is also entirely plausible:<br />
recent unprotected sex with a sex worker may<br />
well be the source <strong>of</strong> the STI which led to the<br />
respondent’s inclusion in the survey sample.<br />
At the other end <strong>of</strong> the spectrum lie male<br />
students, 80 percent <strong>of</strong> whom used a condom<br />
the last time they had sex with a sex worker,<br />
according to the survey findings. However<br />
because only 18 students reported sex with a<br />
sex worker in the last year, the denominator<br />
for this indicator is very small and the<br />
confidence interval is very wide. <strong>The</strong> range<br />
<strong>of</strong> the proportion <strong>of</strong> students using condoms<br />
the last time they had sex with a sex worker,<br />
according to these calculations, lies anywhere<br />
between 62 and 99 percent. In other words,<br />
anywhere from under two thirds <strong>of</strong> students to<br />
almost all students used condoms the last time<br />
they had sex with a sex worker.<br />
However, this very large range makes<br />
it difficult for program planners to respond<br />
with appropriate prevention programs for this<br />
group and to gauge how successful previous<br />
efforts have been. If the true value lies<br />
closer to 99 percent, then condom use is<br />
very high and the battle has already been<br />
partially won. In this case, prevention<br />
strategies (and corresponding funding) could<br />
be best geared for the maintenance <strong>of</strong> desired<br />
behaviors. But since there is a large confidence<br />
interval, the true value may just as likely lie<br />
near 62 percent, which indicates that a<br />
significant proportion <strong>of</strong> the population is still<br />
putting themselves at risk for HIV infection.<br />
This illustrates the difficulty <strong>of</strong> interpreting<br />
data that have wide confidence intervals.<br />
Bivariate analysis<br />
Bivariate analysis is used to investigate<br />
the relationship between two different variables<br />
(in the case <strong>of</strong> BSS usually categorical<br />
variables) that may be associated. Variables<br />
are associated if the value <strong>of</strong> one tells you<br />
something about the value <strong>of</strong> another.<br />
For example, level <strong>of</strong> education is generally<br />
associated with income levels. If you know<br />
that a person has a university education,<br />
you could guess that they earn more money<br />
than a person who did not finish primary<br />
school. Obviously there will be exceptions.<br />
<strong>The</strong> role <strong>of</strong> statistical tests in bivariate analysis<br />
is to determine the extent to which the<br />
association is a real one at a population level,<br />
and the extent to which it may have occurred<br />
just by chance.<br />
<strong>The</strong> most common test used in this context<br />
is known as the Chi-square test, usually<br />
written using the annotation: χ 2 77<br />
B EHAV I OR A L S U R V EI L L A NC E SURV EY S CHAPTER 7