Behavioural Surveillance Surveys - The Wisdom of Whores
Behavioural Surveillance Surveys - The Wisdom of Whores
Behavioural Surveillance Surveys - The Wisdom of Whores
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Calculating weights from<br />
sampling probabilities<br />
Once sampling probabilities have been<br />
calculated, these are converted to sampling<br />
weights as follows:<br />
Where:<br />
W i<br />
= 1/P i<br />
W i<br />
= sampling weight for elements in the<br />
ith cluster; and<br />
P i<br />
= probability <strong>of</strong> selection for elements in<br />
the ith cluster.<br />
Note, however, that when sampling weights<br />
are applied to survey data using standard<br />
computer s<strong>of</strong>tware packages (e.g., EPI-INFO,<br />
SPSS), the number <strong>of</strong> sample observations will<br />
be inflated and will thus imply a larger sample<br />
size than was actually realized in a survey.<br />
As a result, statistical tests for changes in<br />
indicators over time will be based upon<br />
incorrect sample sizes, and misleading<br />
conclusions as to the effects <strong>of</strong> programs<br />
might result. For example, changes that were<br />
not statistically significant based upon the<br />
actual sample size will appear to be significant<br />
based upon the weighted number <strong>of</strong> cases.<br />
Calculating standardized weights<br />
To compensate for this, standardized<br />
weights are <strong>of</strong>ten used. Standardized<br />
weights assign a weight to each sample<br />
observation that reflects its relative probability<br />
<strong>of</strong> selection in comparison with other sample<br />
observations, but does not change the overall<br />
survey sample size. Standardized weights (w i<br />
’)<br />
for sample elements in the i th cluster are<br />
calculated as follows:<br />
It will be noted that since each element<br />
in a given cluster has the same probability<br />
<strong>of</strong> selection, each will also receive the same<br />
standardized weight. Figure 7 illustrates the<br />
computation <strong>of</strong> standardized weights using<br />
hypothetical survey data.<br />
In order to make use <strong>of</strong> standardized<br />
sampling weights during data analysis, it is<br />
necessary to include an appropriate “weight”<br />
variable in the survey data file to be analyzed.<br />
<strong>The</strong> standardized weights can either be<br />
calculated by hand or using a spreadsheet<br />
and entered as a variable during data entry,<br />
or alternatively the first- and second-stage<br />
selection probabilities could be entered and<br />
the weights calculated using appropriate<br />
commands for the statistical package used.<br />
What kind <strong>of</strong> bias can result<br />
by failing to weight the data?<br />
If characteristics <strong>of</strong> the sub-population<br />
being measured differ from one cluster to<br />
the next, and those differences are correlated<br />
to the size <strong>of</strong> the cluster, then this can have<br />
the effect <strong>of</strong> changing the point estimates<br />
(values for indicators).<br />
For example, imagine a situation where an<br />
intervention was conducted to promote 100%<br />
condom use in brothels. Although there were<br />
30 brothels, for the sake <strong>of</strong> efficiency the<br />
intervention focused on only the 10 largest<br />
brothels, because those brothels were thought<br />
to house around 75% <strong>of</strong> all sex workers. As a<br />
result, after several months <strong>of</strong> the intervention,<br />
80% <strong>of</strong> the women in the larger brothels were<br />
consistently using condoms. However, in the<br />
smaller brothels, only 30% <strong>of</strong> the women were<br />
doing so.<br />
w i<br />
’ = w i<br />
n i<br />
/ Σw i<br />
n i<br />
B EHAV I OR A L S U R V EI L L A NC E SURV EY S CHAPTER 5<br />
63