Behavioural Surveillance Surveys - The Wisdom of Whores
Behavioural Surveillance Surveys - The Wisdom of Whores
Behavioural Surveillance Surveys - The Wisdom of Whores
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>The</strong> take-all approach<br />
<strong>The</strong> first option is to use a “take-all”<br />
approach, whereby every population member<br />
who appears at the site during a fixed time<br />
interval is included in the sample, irrespective<br />
<strong>of</strong> how many that turns out to be. This<br />
approach has the advantage <strong>of</strong> resulting in<br />
a self-weighted sample. However it is <strong>of</strong>ten<br />
not feasible to implement, especially where<br />
the number <strong>of</strong> population members who come<br />
into contact with the site is expected to be large.<br />
This approach also has the disadvantage <strong>of</strong><br />
resulting in an overall sample size that may<br />
be different from that expected.<br />
A rule <strong>of</strong> thumb is that the “take-all” method<br />
should not be attempted unless the average<br />
number <strong>of</strong> individuals per time-location cluster<br />
is expected to be small (i.e. 15 or fewer).<br />
A rapid mapping exercise will be needed in<br />
advance <strong>of</strong> the survey to determine the typical<br />
or average number <strong>of</strong> individuals frequenting<br />
sites at various time intervals.<br />
Fixed number <strong>of</strong> respondents per cluster<br />
<strong>The</strong> more commonly used approach for<br />
selecting respondents at the second stage will<br />
be to select a fixed number from each selected<br />
PSU (time-location cluster). A discussion <strong>of</strong><br />
the number <strong>of</strong> respondents to include in each<br />
PSU can be found in the section titled Number<br />
<strong>of</strong> PSUs and sample sizes from each, later in<br />
this chapter. Although this will not result in<br />
a self-weighted sample, it is likely to be more<br />
feasible to implement and it will result in a<br />
predictable final sample size. When this<br />
approach is used, it will be necessary to<br />
estimate the number <strong>of</strong> population members<br />
who appear at the site during the fixed time<br />
interval, so that it will be possible to calculate<br />
the probability that the population members<br />
sampled are representative <strong>of</strong> the wider<br />
population. This will require that someone<br />
be stationed at the site throughout the time<br />
interval to count population members who<br />
appear at the site, even if the fixed sample size<br />
<strong>of</strong> respondents is achieved before the end <strong>of</strong><br />
the specified time interval.<br />
When fixed sample sizes are used with<br />
time-location clusters, it will not be possible to<br />
list all <strong>of</strong> the individuals who will appear at<br />
the site ahead <strong>of</strong> time. <strong>The</strong>refore, an approach<br />
which is as systematic as possible will have to<br />
be devised for randomly selecting respondents<br />
at the site. How to do this will depend on the<br />
number <strong>of</strong> people present at the site at the<br />
beginning <strong>of</strong> the time interval. For example,<br />
if the fixed number <strong>of</strong> respondents to be<br />
sampled from each time-location cluster is 7,<br />
then two scenarios are possible. If the<br />
interviewing team arrives at the site and finds<br />
fewer that 7 respondents, they can select all<br />
those who are present at the time <strong>of</strong> arrival,<br />
and then select the remainder consecutively,<br />
in the order in which the respondents appear<br />
at the site. If, on the other hand, the team<br />
arrives at the site to find a number greater<br />
than the required 7, they must then find a way<br />
to randomly select 7 respondents. This could<br />
be done by rapidly listing the respondents<br />
(by some visible characteristic such as “man in<br />
red shirt” or “woman with big gold earrings”<br />
rather than by name) and then selecting every<br />
ith respondent, using as the sampling interval<br />
the total number <strong>of</strong> respondents present,<br />
divided by the required sample size <strong>of</strong> 7.<br />
Examples <strong>of</strong> how this has sometimes been<br />
done are included in Appendix 3.<br />
Figure 3 summarizes the discussion above,<br />
and provides a “decision tree” to guide<br />
selection <strong>of</strong> first- and second-stage sampling<br />
approaches for cluster surveys.<br />
B EHAV I OR A L S U R V EI L L A NC E SURV EY S CHAPTER 4<br />
43