14.03.2015 Views

Behavioural Surveillance Surveys - The Wisdom of Whores

Behavioural Surveillance Surveys - The Wisdom of Whores

Behavioural Surveillance Surveys - The Wisdom of Whores

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>The</strong> take-all approach<br />

<strong>The</strong> first option is to use a “take-all”<br />

approach, whereby every population member<br />

who appears at the site during a fixed time<br />

interval is included in the sample, irrespective<br />

<strong>of</strong> how many that turns out to be. This<br />

approach has the advantage <strong>of</strong> resulting in<br />

a self-weighted sample. However it is <strong>of</strong>ten<br />

not feasible to implement, especially where<br />

the number <strong>of</strong> population members who come<br />

into contact with the site is expected to be large.<br />

This approach also has the disadvantage <strong>of</strong><br />

resulting in an overall sample size that may<br />

be different from that expected.<br />

A rule <strong>of</strong> thumb is that the “take-all” method<br />

should not be attempted unless the average<br />

number <strong>of</strong> individuals per time-location cluster<br />

is expected to be small (i.e. 15 or fewer).<br />

A rapid mapping exercise will be needed in<br />

advance <strong>of</strong> the survey to determine the typical<br />

or average number <strong>of</strong> individuals frequenting<br />

sites at various time intervals.<br />

Fixed number <strong>of</strong> respondents per cluster<br />

<strong>The</strong> more commonly used approach for<br />

selecting respondents at the second stage will<br />

be to select a fixed number from each selected<br />

PSU (time-location cluster). A discussion <strong>of</strong><br />

the number <strong>of</strong> respondents to include in each<br />

PSU can be found in the section titled Number<br />

<strong>of</strong> PSUs and sample sizes from each, later in<br />

this chapter. Although this will not result in<br />

a self-weighted sample, it is likely to be more<br />

feasible to implement and it will result in a<br />

predictable final sample size. When this<br />

approach is used, it will be necessary to<br />

estimate the number <strong>of</strong> population members<br />

who appear at the site during the fixed time<br />

interval, so that it will be possible to calculate<br />

the probability that the population members<br />

sampled are representative <strong>of</strong> the wider<br />

population. This will require that someone<br />

be stationed at the site throughout the time<br />

interval to count population members who<br />

appear at the site, even if the fixed sample size<br />

<strong>of</strong> respondents is achieved before the end <strong>of</strong><br />

the specified time interval.<br />

When fixed sample sizes are used with<br />

time-location clusters, it will not be possible to<br />

list all <strong>of</strong> the individuals who will appear at<br />

the site ahead <strong>of</strong> time. <strong>The</strong>refore, an approach<br />

which is as systematic as possible will have to<br />

be devised for randomly selecting respondents<br />

at the site. How to do this will depend on the<br />

number <strong>of</strong> people present at the site at the<br />

beginning <strong>of</strong> the time interval. For example,<br />

if the fixed number <strong>of</strong> respondents to be<br />

sampled from each time-location cluster is 7,<br />

then two scenarios are possible. If the<br />

interviewing team arrives at the site and finds<br />

fewer that 7 respondents, they can select all<br />

those who are present at the time <strong>of</strong> arrival,<br />

and then select the remainder consecutively,<br />

in the order in which the respondents appear<br />

at the site. If, on the other hand, the team<br />

arrives at the site to find a number greater<br />

than the required 7, they must then find a way<br />

to randomly select 7 respondents. This could<br />

be done by rapidly listing the respondents<br />

(by some visible characteristic such as “man in<br />

red shirt” or “woman with big gold earrings”<br />

rather than by name) and then selecting every<br />

ith respondent, using as the sampling interval<br />

the total number <strong>of</strong> respondents present,<br />

divided by the required sample size <strong>of</strong> 7.<br />

Examples <strong>of</strong> how this has sometimes been<br />

done are included in Appendix 3.<br />

Figure 3 summarizes the discussion above,<br />

and provides a “decision tree” to guide<br />

selection <strong>of</strong> first- and second-stage sampling<br />

approaches for cluster surveys.<br />

B EHAV I OR A L S U R V EI L L A NC E SURV EY S CHAPTER 4<br />

43

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!