14.03.2015 Views

Behavioural Surveillance Surveys - The Wisdom of Whores

Behavioural Surveillance Surveys - The Wisdom of Whores

Behavioural Surveillance Surveys - The Wisdom of Whores

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

In some settings it may not be acceptable<br />

to conduct surveys <strong>of</strong> youth covering sensitive<br />

and potentially embarrassing topics at their<br />

place <strong>of</strong> residence. In this event, it will be<br />

necessary to identify groups or segments <strong>of</strong><br />

the general population <strong>of</strong> “youth” for whom it<br />

is feasible to locate and interview outside <strong>of</strong><br />

their homes. What criteria should be used in<br />

defining which sub-groups or segments <strong>of</strong><br />

youth to pursue in non-household surveys?<br />

One possibility is to include targeted<br />

sub-groups <strong>of</strong> youth for which there are<br />

interventions planned or in place. Another<br />

approach is to include several categories <strong>of</strong><br />

youth that are thought to cover (collectively)<br />

the spectrum <strong>of</strong> youth in a given setting.<br />

For example, one might consider for inclusion<br />

as “proxy’ groups youth in schools, youth<br />

working in the informal sector <strong>of</strong> the economy<br />

(e.g., street hawkers), or youth working in<br />

low-skill occupations in the formal sector<br />

(e.g., domestic workers, apprentices). Finally,<br />

“special” categories <strong>of</strong> youth such as homeless<br />

or street children might be considered.<br />

It is to be emphasized, however, that<br />

caution should be exercised in generalizing<br />

the results <strong>of</strong> surveys for “proxy” sub-groups<br />

<strong>of</strong> youth. This is because, even collectively,<br />

there is no way to know how well the<br />

behaviors observed across the various “proxy”<br />

groups correspond to behaviors in the general<br />

population <strong>of</strong> youth.<br />

In this section, sampling schemes for four<br />

data collection approaches for youth are<br />

described : (1) household surveys, (2) school<br />

surveys, (3) workplace surveys, and (4) surveys<br />

<strong>of</strong> youth with no fixed residence.<br />

Household surveys <strong>of</strong> youth<br />

When household surveys are to be used<br />

to enumerate youth, a conventional two-stage<br />

cluster sample design is the recommended<br />

sampling approach. Note : this approach<br />

is the same as that proposed for general<br />

population surveys by UNAIDS or in the AIDS<br />

Module <strong>of</strong> the Demographic and Health<br />

<strong>Surveys</strong>, [which are reproductive health<br />

surveys conducted on household samples <strong>of</strong><br />

women, and sometimes men]. <strong>The</strong> basic<br />

approach is to take a sample <strong>of</strong> geographic<br />

areas (used as PSU’s) at the first stage <strong>of</strong><br />

sample selection. <strong>The</strong> second stage would<br />

be to sample a predetermined number <strong>of</strong><br />

households from each sample cluster or PSU.<br />

Finally the third stage would be to interview<br />

all male or female respondents (sampling is<br />

done separately by gender) ages 15-19 (or in<br />

whatever age range is used to define “youth”)<br />

found in sample households. <strong>The</strong> recommended<br />

age categories for sampling youth are “

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!