14.03.2015 Views

Behavioural Surveillance Surveys - The Wisdom of Whores

Behavioural Surveillance Surveys - The Wisdom of Whores

Behavioural Surveillance Surveys - The Wisdom of Whores

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Step 3 : Choosing<br />

sub-populations for<br />

behavioral surveillance<br />

Experience has shown that the first <strong>of</strong> these<br />

issues is <strong>of</strong>ten the most difficult to resolve.<br />

Ideally, sub-populations should be chosen on<br />

the basis <strong>of</strong> their contribution or potential<br />

contribution to the spread <strong>of</strong> HIV in the local<br />

situation, and because prevention efforts are<br />

underway or planned to reduce risk behavior<br />

in those particular groups. Some sub-populations<br />

may be chosen to represent particular<br />

types <strong>of</strong> risk behavior, with behavioral or<br />

occupational groups all included as separate<br />

respondent groups. In practice, the choice <strong>of</strong><br />

sub-populations is influenced by many factors<br />

other than epidemiological concerns. Political<br />

considerations, resources and feasibility <strong>of</strong><br />

access all have a part to play. Indeed the<br />

process <strong>of</strong> choosing sub-populations for BSS<br />

ideally should include a rapid assessment<br />

stage that confirms that members <strong>of</strong> the group<br />

exist in sufficient numbers and that they do<br />

engage in high risk beheviors. It should also<br />

investigate the feasibility <strong>of</strong> data collection<br />

among potential respondents.<br />

In this process <strong>of</strong> selecting sub-populations<br />

and confirming their relevance and feasibility<br />

as potential respondent groups for BSS, care<br />

should be taken to use existing data which<br />

can indicate what sub-populations are most at<br />

risk in a society, and which behaviors put<br />

them at risk. Press reports and interviews with<br />

people likely to have information on sexual<br />

and drug-taking behavior can also inform<br />

preliminary decisions about relevant risk<br />

groups and behaviors. This is discussed in<br />

greater detail in the section on rapid assessment<br />

on page 26.<br />

Step 4 : Defining measurement<br />

objectives<br />

One <strong>of</strong> the driving factors behind the<br />

choice <strong>of</strong> sub-populations for BSS will be the<br />

country’s strategic prevention priorities. After<br />

sub-populations have been discussed and<br />

agreed upon, surveillance planners should<br />

clearly articulate why they have chosen these<br />

groups. In other words, what exactly they<br />

want to know, how they plan to measure it,<br />

and how that information will help improve<br />

national prevention efforts.<br />

Failure to articulate objectives clearly at this<br />

stage may lead to wasted resources and lost<br />

opportunities in the data collection phase.<br />

Information may be collected in ways that are<br />

not easy to interpret or not comparable with<br />

other data sources, and questions which need<br />

answering may go unanswered.<br />

What will the information be used for ?<br />

Information is collected to be used.<br />

It follows that it must be presented in a form<br />

that will be useful to those who have the<br />

power to act on it. Defining the likely users<br />

and uses <strong>of</strong> information is an important first<br />

step in defining the overall measurement<br />

objectives. Specifying the ultimate data uses<br />

will lead to rational answers to the next<br />

question period.<br />

B EHAV I OR A L S U R V EI L L A NC E SURV EY S CHAPTER 2<br />

15

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!