Critical Thinking Assessment Report 12/13 AY
Critical Thinking Assessment Report 12/13 AY
Critical Thinking Assessment Report 12/13 AY
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
6. Follow where evidence and reasons lead?<br />
7. Adhere to the conventions of Standardized American English?<br />
Each reader gave a score of 1, 2, 3 or 4 to each criterion.<br />
1=very poor or missing<br />
2=poor/weak<br />
3=okay/satisfactory<br />
4=strong/excellent<br />
A score of 3 or 4 is considered acceptable; a score of 1 or 2 is considered not acceptable.<br />
Of the seven criteria, on criterion 7 had an average that was acceptable; all others had averages that<br />
were in the unacceptable range. The follow graph provides a visual of the averages:<br />
Data were also collected on how many of the artifacts were in-class versus out-of-class assignments.<br />
There were 19 in-class assignment artifacts and 28 out-of-class assignment artifacts.<br />
Data were also compiled regarding splits. A split is considered any reading by the two independent<br />
readers that bridged the acceptable/unacceptable range. In other words, if one reader gave a criterion<br />
on a particular artifact a 4 and the second reader gave the same criterion on the same artifact a 2, this is<br />
considered a split. Given that there were 47 artifacts assessed and each artifacts was scored for seven<br />
criteria, that provides 329 separate pairs to examine for splits. Of the 329 pairs, 49 had splits, which is<br />
15%. Another way to look at splits is by artifact. Of the 47 artifacts, there was at least one criterion over