10.03.2015 Views

trends-2011-vol1-enrolment-e

trends-2011-vol1-enrolment-e

trends-2011-vol1-enrolment-e

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

than the advantage for males<br />

100%<br />

This presents an important implication for male <strong>enrolment</strong>s. As<br />

noted earlier in this document, men comprise only about 42 percent<br />

of bachelor’s students. If males respond now to the income and<br />

other labour market signals the way that women did in the 1970s<br />

and 1980s, the recent growth in their income advantage and<br />

the relative decline in low-skill manual jobs could drive more rapid<br />

increases in <strong>enrolment</strong> demand by men over the coming decade.<br />

FIGURE 37: The earnings advantage for male university graduates<br />

increased significantly between 1980 and 2005<br />

1980<br />

The study also found that while the income advantage was systematically<br />

higher for women than men, it did not grow as substantially<br />

over the same period. In 1980, the income advantage for women<br />

with a bachelor’s degree was 57 percent, and increased to 66 percent<br />

in 2005. The income advantage for women with a college degree<br />

grew from 13 percent in 1980 to 16 percent in 2005.<br />

1985<br />

1990<br />

1995<br />

2000<br />

2005<br />

Income relative to women with a<br />

high school diploma<br />

80%<br />

60%<br />

The 2006 Census also identified the country in which the highest<br />

level of 40% education was attained. It is now possible to distinguish<br />

between<br />

20%<br />

the incomes of graduates who earned their degrees from<br />

a Canadian university compared to those who earned their degrees<br />

0%<br />

abroad. This is important, given that a relatively large and growing<br />

number -20% of university graduates immigrated to Canada after earning<br />

their degrees<br />

-40%<br />

abroad, and because the incomes of these recent<br />

1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005<br />

immigrants are lower than those of their Canadian counterparts.<br />

Including the income of all graduates in income comparisons<br />

Less than high school diploma<br />

Bachelor's degree<br />

understates the value of degrees earned in Canada. Therefore, the<br />

returns identified in College the Boudarbat, and trade diploma Lemieux and Riddell study<br />

Graduate degree<br />

would have been higher and the advantage would have grown even<br />

more over time<br />

Source:<br />

if<br />

Boudarbat,<br />

the researchers<br />

Lemieux, Riddell<br />

had<br />

2010<br />

been able to differentiate<br />

the incomes of graduates of Canadian universities.<br />

Postgra<br />

Bachelo<br />

College<br />

Less tha<br />

FIGURE 42: University graduates are fa<br />

to experience long periods of low inco<br />

Less Postgraduate than high degree school FIGURE 38: The earnings Bachelor's advantage degree for female university<br />

diploma graduates increased between 1980 and 2005, and remains higher<br />

than the advantage for males<br />

College Bachelor's Less than and high degree trade school diploma diploma Postgraduate degree<br />

College and 100% trade diploma<br />

Income relative to women with a<br />

high school diploma<br />

Source: Boudarbat, Lemieux, Riddell 2010<br />

80%<br />

60%<br />

40%<br />

20%<br />

0%<br />

-20%<br />

-40%<br />

1980<br />

1985<br />

1990<br />

Less than high school diploma<br />

College and trade diploma<br />

1995<br />

2000<br />

2005<br />

Bachelor's degree<br />

Graduate degree<br />

Earned<br />

Postgraduate degree doctorate<br />

Income difference relative to high school graduates<br />

Bachelor's degree Master’s degree<br />

College and trade diploma<br />

Bachelor’s<br />

degree<br />

Less than high school diploma<br />

FIGURE 39: Graduates educated in Canada earn significantly<br />

higher premia than peers educated outside Canada<br />

Total college or<br />

CEGEP<br />

Registered<br />

apprenticeship<br />

certificate<br />

Trades certificate<br />

or diploma<br />

Three or more years<br />

of low income<br />

One or two years<br />

of low income<br />

Earned outside Canada<br />

Earned in Canada<br />

0% 5% 10%<br />

University degree<br />

-25% 0% 25% 50% 75% 100% Non-university 125% with<br />

Source: Statistics Canada, 2006 Census<br />

certificate or diploma<br />

Earned outside<br />

Earned in Cana<br />

Som<br />

degr<br />

Grad<br />

Less<br />

Source: Boudarbat, Lemieux, Riddell 2010<br />

Source: Statistics Canada, Survey of Labour and<br />

AUCC<br />

FIGURE 39: Graduates educated in Canada earn significantly<br />

higher premia than peers educated outside Canada<br />

Trends in Higher Education | Volume 1. Enrolment | 41<br />

FIGURE 43: In 2009, unemployment r<br />

dramatically for those who had not

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!