trends-2011-vol1-enrolment-e
trends-2011-vol1-enrolment-e
trends-2011-vol1-enrolment-e
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
than the advantage for males<br />
100%<br />
This presents an important implication for male <strong>enrolment</strong>s. As<br />
noted earlier in this document, men comprise only about 42 percent<br />
of bachelor’s students. If males respond now to the income and<br />
other labour market signals the way that women did in the 1970s<br />
and 1980s, the recent growth in their income advantage and<br />
the relative decline in low-skill manual jobs could drive more rapid<br />
increases in <strong>enrolment</strong> demand by men over the coming decade.<br />
FIGURE 37: The earnings advantage for male university graduates<br />
increased significantly between 1980 and 2005<br />
1980<br />
The study also found that while the income advantage was systematically<br />
higher for women than men, it did not grow as substantially<br />
over the same period. In 1980, the income advantage for women<br />
with a bachelor’s degree was 57 percent, and increased to 66 percent<br />
in 2005. The income advantage for women with a college degree<br />
grew from 13 percent in 1980 to 16 percent in 2005.<br />
1985<br />
1990<br />
1995<br />
2000<br />
2005<br />
Income relative to women with a<br />
high school diploma<br />
80%<br />
60%<br />
The 2006 Census also identified the country in which the highest<br />
level of 40% education was attained. It is now possible to distinguish<br />
between<br />
20%<br />
the incomes of graduates who earned their degrees from<br />
a Canadian university compared to those who earned their degrees<br />
0%<br />
abroad. This is important, given that a relatively large and growing<br />
number -20% of university graduates immigrated to Canada after earning<br />
their degrees<br />
-40%<br />
abroad, and because the incomes of these recent<br />
1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005<br />
immigrants are lower than those of their Canadian counterparts.<br />
Including the income of all graduates in income comparisons<br />
Less than high school diploma<br />
Bachelor's degree<br />
understates the value of degrees earned in Canada. Therefore, the<br />
returns identified in College the Boudarbat, and trade diploma Lemieux and Riddell study<br />
Graduate degree<br />
would have been higher and the advantage would have grown even<br />
more over time<br />
Source:<br />
if<br />
Boudarbat,<br />
the researchers<br />
Lemieux, Riddell<br />
had<br />
2010<br />
been able to differentiate<br />
the incomes of graduates of Canadian universities.<br />
Postgra<br />
Bachelo<br />
College<br />
Less tha<br />
FIGURE 42: University graduates are fa<br />
to experience long periods of low inco<br />
Less Postgraduate than high degree school FIGURE 38: The earnings Bachelor's advantage degree for female university<br />
diploma graduates increased between 1980 and 2005, and remains higher<br />
than the advantage for males<br />
College Bachelor's Less than and high degree trade school diploma diploma Postgraduate degree<br />
College and 100% trade diploma<br />
Income relative to women with a<br />
high school diploma<br />
Source: Boudarbat, Lemieux, Riddell 2010<br />
80%<br />
60%<br />
40%<br />
20%<br />
0%<br />
-20%<br />
-40%<br />
1980<br />
1985<br />
1990<br />
Less than high school diploma<br />
College and trade diploma<br />
1995<br />
2000<br />
2005<br />
Bachelor's degree<br />
Graduate degree<br />
Earned<br />
Postgraduate degree doctorate<br />
Income difference relative to high school graduates<br />
Bachelor's degree Master’s degree<br />
College and trade diploma<br />
Bachelor’s<br />
degree<br />
Less than high school diploma<br />
FIGURE 39: Graduates educated in Canada earn significantly<br />
higher premia than peers educated outside Canada<br />
Total college or<br />
CEGEP<br />
Registered<br />
apprenticeship<br />
certificate<br />
Trades certificate<br />
or diploma<br />
Three or more years<br />
of low income<br />
One or two years<br />
of low income<br />
Earned outside Canada<br />
Earned in Canada<br />
0% 5% 10%<br />
University degree<br />
-25% 0% 25% 50% 75% 100% Non-university 125% with<br />
Source: Statistics Canada, 2006 Census<br />
certificate or diploma<br />
Earned outside<br />
Earned in Cana<br />
Som<br />
degr<br />
Grad<br />
Less<br />
Source: Boudarbat, Lemieux, Riddell 2010<br />
Source: Statistics Canada, Survey of Labour and<br />
AUCC<br />
FIGURE 39: Graduates educated in Canada earn significantly<br />
higher premia than peers educated outside Canada<br />
Trends in Higher Education | Volume 1. Enrolment | 41<br />
FIGURE 43: In 2009, unemployment r<br />
dramatically for those who had not