v2009.01.01 - Convex Optimization

v2009.01.01 - Convex Optimization v2009.01.01 - Convex Optimization

convexoptimization.com
from convexoptimization.com More from this publisher
10.03.2015 Views

96 CHAPTER 2. CONVEX GEOMETRY 2.7.2.2.1 Definition. Proper cone: a cone that is pointed closed convex has nonempty interior (is full-dimensional). △ A proper cone remains proper under injective linear transformation. [79,5.1] Examples of proper cones are the positive semidefinite cone S M + in the ambient space of symmetric matrices (2.9), the nonnegative real line R + in vector space R , or any orthant in R n . 2.8 Cone boundary Every hyperplane supporting a convex cone contains the origin. [173,A.4.2] Because any supporting hyperplane to a convex cone must therefore itself be a cone, then from the cone intersection theorem it follows: 2.8.0.0.1 Lemma. Cone faces. [25,II.8] Each nonempty exposed face of a convex cone is a convex cone. ⋄ 2.8.0.0.2 Theorem. Proper-cone boundary. Suppose a nonzero point Γ lies on the boundary ∂K of proper cone K in R n . Then it follows that the ray {ζΓ | ζ ≥ 0} also belongs to ∂K . ⋄ Proof. By virtue of its propriety, a proper cone guarantees existence of a strictly supporting hyperplane at the origin. [266, cor.11.7.3] 2.30 Hence the origin belongs to the boundary of K because it is the zero-dimensional exposed face. The origin belongs to the ray through Γ , and the ray belongs to K by definition (156). By the cone faces lemma, each and every nonempty exposed face must include the origin. Hence the closed line segment 0Γ must lie in an exposed face of K because both endpoints do by Definition 2.6.1.3.1. That means there exists a supporting hyperplane ∂H to K containing 0Γ . 2.30 Rockafellar’s corollary yields a supporting hyperplane at the origin to any convex cone in R n not equal to R n .

2.8. CONE BOUNDARY 97 So the ray through Γ belongs both to K and to ∂H . expose a face of K that contains the ray; id est, ∂H must therefore {ζΓ | ζ ≥ 0} ⊆ K ∩ ∂H ⊂ ∂K (166) Proper cone {0} in R 0 has no boundary (153) because (11) rel int{0} = {0} (167) The boundary of any proper cone in R is the origin. The boundary of any convex cone whose dimension exceeds 1 can be constructed entirely from an aggregate of rays emanating exclusively from the origin. 2.8.1 Extreme direction The property extreme direction arises naturally in connection with the pointed closed convex cone K ⊂ R n , being analogous to extreme point. [266,18, p.162] 2.31 An extreme direction Γ ε of pointed K is a vector corresponding to an edge that is a ray emanating from the origin. 2.32 Nonzero direction Γ ε in pointed K is extreme if and only if ζ 1 Γ 1 +ζ 2 Γ 2 ≠ Γ ε ∀ ζ 1 , ζ 2 ≥ 0, ∀ Γ 1 , Γ 2 ∈ K\{ζΓ ε ∈ K | ζ ≥0} (168) In words, an extreme direction in a pointed closed convex cone is the direction of a ray, called an extreme ray, that cannot be expressed as a conic combination of directions of any rays in the cone distinct from it. An extreme ray is a one-dimensional face of K . By (96), extreme direction Γ ε is not a point relatively interior to any line segment in K\{ζΓ ε ∈ K | ζ ≥0}. Thus, by analogy, the corresponding extreme ray {ζΓ ε ∈ K | ζ ≥0} is not a ray relatively interior to any plane segment 2.33 in K . 2.31 We diverge from Rockafellar’s extreme direction: “extreme point at infinity”. 2.32 An edge (2.6.0.0.3) of a convex cone is not necessarily a ray. A convex cone may contain an edge that is a line; e.g., a wedge-shaped polyhedral cone (K ∗ in Figure 35). 2.33 A planar fragment; in this context, a planar cone.

2.8. CONE BOUNDARY 97<br />

So the ray through Γ belongs both to K and to ∂H .<br />

expose a face of K that contains the ray; id est,<br />

∂H must therefore<br />

{ζΓ | ζ ≥ 0} ⊆ K ∩ ∂H ⊂ ∂K (166)<br />

Proper cone {0} in R 0 has no boundary (153) because (11)<br />

rel int{0} = {0} (167)<br />

The boundary of any proper cone in R is the origin.<br />

The boundary of any convex cone whose dimension exceeds 1 can be<br />

constructed entirely from an aggregate of rays emanating exclusively from<br />

the origin.<br />

<br />

2.8.1 Extreme direction<br />

The property extreme direction arises naturally in connection with the<br />

pointed closed convex cone K ⊂ R n , being analogous to extreme point.<br />

[266,18, p.162] 2.31 An extreme direction Γ ε of pointed K is a vector<br />

corresponding to an edge that is a ray emanating from the origin. 2.32<br />

Nonzero direction Γ ε in pointed K is extreme if and only if<br />

ζ 1 Γ 1 +ζ 2 Γ 2 ≠ Γ ε ∀ ζ 1 , ζ 2 ≥ 0, ∀ Γ 1 , Γ 2 ∈ K\{ζΓ ε ∈ K | ζ ≥0} (168)<br />

In words, an extreme direction in a pointed closed convex cone is the<br />

direction of a ray, called an extreme ray, that cannot be expressed as a conic<br />

combination of directions of any rays in the cone distinct from it.<br />

An extreme ray is a one-dimensional face of K . By (96), extreme<br />

direction Γ ε is not a point relatively interior to any line segment in<br />

K\{ζΓ ε ∈ K | ζ ≥0}. Thus, by analogy, the corresponding extreme ray<br />

{ζΓ ε ∈ K | ζ ≥0} is not a ray relatively interior to any plane segment 2.33<br />

in K .<br />

2.31 We diverge from Rockafellar’s extreme direction: “extreme point at infinity”.<br />

2.32 An edge (2.6.0.0.3) of a convex cone is not necessarily a ray. A convex cone may<br />

contain an edge that is a line; e.g., a wedge-shaped polyhedral cone (K ∗ in Figure 35).<br />

2.33 A planar fragment; in this context, a planar cone.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!