v2009.01.01 - Convex Optimization
v2009.01.01 - Convex Optimization v2009.01.01 - Convex Optimization
656 APPENDIX E. PROJECTION and define the rows a ∗T i of its pseudoinverse A † as in (1803). Then orthogonal projection of vector x∈ R n on R(A) is a sum of one-dimensional nonorthogonal projections Px = AA † x = n∑ i=1 a i a ∗T i x (1813) where each nonsymmetric dyad a i a ∗T i is a nonorthogonal projector projecting on R(a i ) , (E.6.1) idempotent because of biorthogonality condition A † A = I . The projection Px is regarded as the best approximation to x from the set R(A) , as it was in Example E.5.0.0.1. E.5.0.0.3 Example. Biorthogonal expansion as nonorthogonal projection. Biorthogonal expansion can be viewed as a sum of components, each a nonorthogonal projection on the range of an extreme direction of a pointed polyhedral cone K ; e.g., Figure 139. Suppose matrix A∈ R m×n holds a nonorthogonal basis for R(A) in its columns as in (1802), and the rows of pseudoinverse A † are defined as in (1803). Assuming the most general biorthogonality condition (A † + BZ T )A = I with BZ T defined as for (1762), then biorthogonal expansion of vector x is a sum of one-dimensional nonorthogonal projections; for x∈ R(A) x = A(A † + BZ T )x = AA † x = n∑ i=1 a i a ∗T i x (1814) where each dyad a i a ∗T i is a nonorthogonal projector projecting on R(a i ). (E.6.1) The extreme directions of K=cone(A) are {a 1 ,..., a n } the linearly independent columns of A , while the extreme directions {a ∗ 1 ,..., a ∗ n} of relative dual cone K ∗ ∩aff K=cone(A †T ) (2.13.9.4) correspond to the linearly independent (B.1.1.1) rows of A † . Directions of nonorthogonal projection are determined by the pseudoinverse; id est, direction of projection a i a ∗T i x−x on R(a i ) is orthogonal to a ∗ i . E.9 E.9 This remains true in high dimension although only a little more difficult to visualize in R 3 ; confer , Figure 56.
E.5. PROJECTION EXAMPLES 657 a ∗ 2 K ∗ a 2 a ∗ 1 z x K 0 y a 1 a 1 ⊥ a ∗ 2 a 2 ⊥ a ∗ 1 x = y + z = P a1 x + P a2 x K ∗ Figure 139: (confer Figure 55) Biorthogonal expansion of point x∈aff K is found by projecting x nonorthogonally on extreme directions of polyhedral cone K ⊂ R 2 . (Dotted lines of projection bound this translated negated cone.) Direction of projection on extreme direction a 1 is orthogonal to extreme direction a ∗ 1 of dual cone K ∗ and parallel to a 2 (E.3.5); similarly, direction of projection on a 2 is orthogonal to a ∗ 2 and parallel to a 1 . Point x is sum of nonorthogonal projections: x on R(a 1 ) and x on R(a 2 ). Expansion is unique because extreme directions of K are linearly independent. Were a 1 orthogonal to a 2 , then K would be identical to K ∗ and nonorthogonal projections would become orthogonal.
- Page 605 and 606: C.4. TWO-SIDED ORTHOGONAL PROCRUSTE
- Page 607 and 608: C.4. TWO-SIDED ORTHOGONAL PROCRUSTE
- Page 609 and 610: Appendix D Matrix calculus From too
- Page 611 and 612: D.1. DIRECTIONAL DERIVATIVE, TAYLOR
- Page 613 and 614: D.1. DIRECTIONAL DERIVATIVE, TAYLOR
- Page 615 and 616: D.1. DIRECTIONAL DERIVATIVE, TAYLOR
- Page 617 and 618: D.1. DIRECTIONAL DERIVATIVE, TAYLOR
- Page 619 and 620: D.1. DIRECTIONAL DERIVATIVE, TAYLOR
- Page 621 and 622: D.1. DIRECTIONAL DERIVATIVE, TAYLOR
- Page 623 and 624: D.1. DIRECTIONAL DERIVATIVE, TAYLOR
- Page 625 and 626: D.1. DIRECTIONAL DERIVATIVE, TAYLOR
- Page 627 and 628: D.1. DIRECTIONAL DERIVATIVE, TAYLOR
- Page 629 and 630: D.1. DIRECTIONAL DERIVATIVE, TAYLOR
- Page 631 and 632: D.2. TABLES OF GRADIENTS AND DERIVA
- Page 633 and 634: D.2. TABLES OF GRADIENTS AND DERIVA
- Page 635 and 636: D.2. TABLES OF GRADIENTS AND DERIVA
- Page 637 and 638: D.2. TABLES OF GRADIENTS AND DERIVA
- Page 639 and 640: Appendix E Projection For any A∈
- Page 641 and 642: 641 U T = U † for orthonormal (in
- Page 643 and 644: E.1. IDEMPOTENT MATRICES 643 where
- Page 645 and 646: E.1. IDEMPOTENT MATRICES 645 order,
- Page 647 and 648: E.1. IDEMPOTENT MATRICES 647 When t
- Page 649 and 650: E.3. SYMMETRIC IDEMPOTENT MATRICES
- Page 651 and 652: E.3. SYMMETRIC IDEMPOTENT MATRICES
- Page 653 and 654: E.3. SYMMETRIC IDEMPOTENT MATRICES
- Page 655: E.5. PROJECTION EXAMPLES 655 E.4.0.
- Page 659 and 660: E.5. PROJECTION EXAMPLES 659 E.5.0.
- Page 661 and 662: E.6. VECTORIZATION INTERPRETATION,
- Page 663 and 664: E.6. VECTORIZATION INTERPRETATION,
- Page 665 and 666: E.6. VECTORIZATION INTERPRETATION,
- Page 667 and 668: E.6. VECTORIZATION INTERPRETATION,
- Page 669 and 670: E.7. ON VECTORIZED MATRICES OF HIGH
- Page 671 and 672: E.7. ON VECTORIZED MATRICES OF HIGH
- Page 673 and 674: E.8. RANGE/ROWSPACE INTERPRETATION
- Page 675 and 676: E.9. PROJECTION ON CONVEX SET 675 A
- Page 677 and 678: E.9. PROJECTION ON CONVEX SET 677 W
- Page 679 and 680: E.9. PROJECTION ON CONVEX SET 679 P
- Page 681 and 682: E.9. PROJECTION ON CONVEX SET 681 E
- Page 683 and 684: E.9. PROJECTION ON CONVEX SET 683 T
- Page 685 and 686: E.9. PROJECTION ON CONVEX SET 685
- Page 687 and 688: E.10. ALTERNATING PROJECTION 687 E.
- Page 689 and 690: E.10. ALTERNATING PROJECTION 689 b
- Page 691 and 692: E.10. ALTERNATING PROJECTION 691 a
- Page 693 and 694: E.10. ALTERNATING PROJECTION 693 (a
- Page 695 and 696: E.10. ALTERNATING PROJECTION 695 wh
- Page 697 and 698: E.10. ALTERNATING PROJECTION 697 E.
- Page 699 and 700: E.10. ALTERNATING PROJECTION 699 10
- Page 701 and 702: E.10. ALTERNATING PROJECTION 701 E.
- Page 703 and 704: E.10. ALTERNATING PROJECTION 703 E
- Page 705 and 706: Appendix F Notation and a few defin
656 APPENDIX E. PROJECTION<br />
and define the rows a ∗T<br />
i of its pseudoinverse A † as in (1803). Then<br />
orthogonal projection of vector x∈ R n on R(A) is a sum of one-dimensional<br />
nonorthogonal projections<br />
Px = AA † x =<br />
n∑<br />
i=1<br />
a i a ∗T<br />
i x (1813)<br />
where each nonsymmetric dyad a i a ∗T<br />
i is a nonorthogonal projector projecting<br />
on R(a i ) , (E.6.1) idempotent because of biorthogonality condition A † A = I .<br />
The projection Px is regarded as the best approximation to x from the<br />
set R(A) , as it was in Example E.5.0.0.1.<br />
<br />
E.5.0.0.3 Example. Biorthogonal expansion as nonorthogonal projection.<br />
Biorthogonal expansion can be viewed as a sum of components, each a<br />
nonorthogonal projection on the range of an extreme direction of a pointed<br />
polyhedral cone K ; e.g., Figure 139.<br />
Suppose matrix A∈ R m×n holds a nonorthogonal basis for R(A) in<br />
its columns as in (1802), and the rows of pseudoinverse A † are defined<br />
as in (1803). Assuming the most general biorthogonality condition<br />
(A † + BZ T )A = I with BZ T defined as for (1762), then biorthogonal<br />
expansion of vector x is a sum of one-dimensional nonorthogonal projections;<br />
for x∈ R(A)<br />
x = A(A † + BZ T )x = AA † x =<br />
n∑<br />
i=1<br />
a i a ∗T<br />
i x (1814)<br />
where each dyad a i a ∗T<br />
i is a nonorthogonal projector projecting on R(a i ).<br />
(E.6.1) The extreme directions of K=cone(A) are {a 1 ,..., a n } the linearly<br />
independent columns of A , while the extreme directions {a ∗ 1 ,..., a ∗ n}<br />
of relative dual cone K ∗ ∩aff K=cone(A †T ) (2.13.9.4) correspond to the<br />
linearly independent (B.1.1.1) rows of A † . Directions of nonorthogonal<br />
projection are determined by the pseudoinverse; id est, direction of<br />
projection a i a ∗T<br />
i x−x on R(a i ) is orthogonal to a ∗ i . E.9<br />
E.9 This remains true in high dimension although only a little more difficult to visualize<br />
in R 3 ; confer , Figure 56.