10.03.2015 Views

v2009.01.01 - Convex Optimization

v2009.01.01 - Convex Optimization

v2009.01.01 - Convex Optimization

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

A.7. ZEROS 575<br />

A.7.5.0.1 Proposition. (Sturm) Dyad-decompositions. [292,5.2]<br />

Let positive semidefinite matrix X ∈ S M + have rank ρ . Then given symmetric<br />

matrix A∈ S M , 〈A, X〉 = 0 if and only if there exists a dyad-decomposition<br />

satisfying<br />

X =<br />

ρ∑<br />

x j xj T (1488)<br />

j=1<br />

〈A , x j x T j 〉 = 0 for each and every j ∈ {1... ρ} (1489)<br />

⋄<br />

The dyad-decomposition of X proposed is generally not that obtained<br />

from a standard diagonalization by eigen decomposition, unless ρ =1 or<br />

the given matrix A is diagonalizable simultaneously (A.7.4) with X .<br />

That means, elemental dyads in decomposition (1488) constitute a generally<br />

nonorthogonal set. Sturm & Zhang give a simple procedure for constructing<br />

the dyad-decomposition (Wıκımization); matrix A may be regarded as a<br />

parameter.<br />

A.7.5.0.2 Example. Dyad.<br />

The dyad uv T ∈ R M×M (B.1) is zero definite on all x for which either<br />

x T u=0 or x T v=0;<br />

{x | x T uv T x = 0} = {x | x T u=0} ∪ {x | v T x=0} (1490)<br />

id est, on u ⊥ ∪ v ⊥ . Symmetrizing the dyad does not change the outcome:<br />

{x | x T (uv T + vu T )x/2 = 0} = {x | x T u=0} ∪ {x | v T x=0} (1491)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!