v2009.01.01 - Convex Optimization
v2009.01.01 - Convex Optimization v2009.01.01 - Convex Optimization
508 CHAPTER 7. PROXIMITY PROBLEMS projection of an ordered vector of eigenvalues (in diagonal matrix Λ) on a subset of the monotone nonnegative cone (2.13.9.4.2) K M+ = {υ | υ 1 ≥ υ 2 ≥ · · · ≥ υ N−1 ≥ 0} ⊆ R N−1 + (383) Of interest, momentarily, is only the smallest convex subset of the monotone nonnegative cone K M+ containing every nonincreasingly ordered eigenspectrum corresponding to a rank ρ subset of the positive semidefinite cone S N−1 + ; id est, K ρ M+ ∆ = {υ ∈ R ρ | υ 1 ≥ υ 2 ≥ · · · ≥ υ ρ ≥ 0} ⊆ R ρ + (1231) a pointed polyhedral cone, a ρ-dimensional convex subset of the monotone nonnegative cone K M+ ⊆ R N−1 + having property, for λ denoting eigenspectra, [ ρ ] K M+ = π(λ(rank ρ subset)) ⊆ K N−1 ∆ 0 M+ = K M+ (1232) For each and every elemental eigenspectrum γ ∈ λ(rank ρ subset)⊆ R N−1 + (1233) of the rank ρ subset (ordered or unordered in λ), there is a nonlinear surjection π(γ) onto K ρ M+ . 7.1.3.0.2 Exercise. Smallest spectral cone. Prove that there is no convex subset of K M+ smaller than K ρ M+ containing every ordered eigenspectrum corresponding to the rank ρ subset of a positive semidefinite cone (2.9.2.1). 7.1.3.0.3 Proposition. (Hardy-Littlewood-Pólya) Inequalities. [153,X] [48,1.2] Any vectors σ and γ in R N−1 satisfy a tight inequality π(σ) T π(γ) ≥ σ T γ ≥ π(σ) T Ξπ(γ) (1234) where Ξ is the order-reversing permutation matrix defined in (1608), and permutator π(γ) is a nonlinear function that sorts vector γ into nonincreasing order thereby providing the greatest upper bound and least lower bound with respect to every possible sorting. ⋄
7.1. FIRST PREVALENT PROBLEM: 509 7.1.3.0.4 Corollary. Monotone nonnegative sort. Any given vectors σ,γ∈R N−1 satisfy a tight Euclidean distance inequality ‖π(σ) − π(γ)‖ ≤ ‖σ − γ‖ (1235) where nonlinear function π(γ) sorts vector γ into nonincreasing order thereby providing the least lower bound with respect to every possible sorting. ⋄ Given γ ∈ R N−1 inf σ∈R N−1 + ‖σ−γ‖ = inf σ∈R N−1 + ‖π(σ)−π(γ)‖ = inf σ∈R N−1 + ‖σ−π(γ)‖ = inf ‖σ−π(γ)‖ σ∈K M+ Yet for γ representing an arbitrary vector of eigenvalues, because (1236) inf [ R ρ σ∈ + 0 ]‖σ − γ‖ 2 ≥ inf [ R ρ σ∈ + 0 ]‖σ − π(γ)‖ 2 = inf [ ρ K σ∈ M+ 0 ]‖σ − π(γ)‖ 2 (1237) then projection of γ on the eigenspectra of a rank ρ subset can be tightened simply by presorting γ into nonincreasing order. Proof. Simply because π(γ) 1:ρ ≽ π(γ 1:ρ ) inf [ R ρ σ∈ + 0 inf [ R ρ σ∈ + 0 ]‖σ − γ‖ 2 = γ T ρ+1:N−1 γ ρ+1:N−1 + inf ]‖σ − γ‖ 2 ≥ inf = γ T γ + inf σ∈R N−1 + ≥ γ T γ + inf σ∈R N−1 + σ T 1:ρσ 1:ρ − 2σ T 1:ργ 1:ρ ‖σ 1:ρ − γ 1:ρ ‖ 2 σ1:ρσ T 1:ρ − 2σ T (1238) 1:ρπ(γ) 1:ρ σ∈R N−1 + [ R ρ ]‖σ − π(γ)‖ 2 σ∈ + 0
- Page 457 and 458: 6.4. A GEOMETRY OF COMPLETION 457 F
- Page 459 and 460: 6.5. EDM DEFINITION IN 11 T 459 by
- Page 461 and 462: 6.5. EDM DEFINITION IN 11 T 461 6.5
- Page 463 and 464: 6.5. EDM DEFINITION IN 11 T 463 1 0
- Page 465 and 466: 6.5. EDM DEFINITION IN 11 T 465 6.5
- Page 467 and 468: 6.6. CORRESPONDENCE TO PSD CONE S N
- Page 469 and 470: 6.6. CORRESPONDENCE TO PSD CONE S N
- Page 471 and 472: 6.6. CORRESPONDENCE TO PSD CONE S N
- Page 473 and 474: 6.7. VECTORIZATION & PROJECTION INT
- Page 475 and 476: 6.7. VECTORIZATION & PROJECTION INT
- Page 477 and 478: 6.8. DUAL EDM CONE 477 When the Fin
- Page 479 and 480: 6.8. DUAL EDM CONE 479 Proof. First
- Page 481 and 482: 6.8. DUAL EDM CONE 481 EDM 2 = S 2
- Page 483 and 484: 6.8. DUAL EDM CONE 483 whose veraci
- Page 485 and 486: 6.8. DUAL EDM CONE 485 6.8.1.3.1 Ex
- Page 487 and 488: 6.8. DUAL EDM CONE 487 has dual aff
- Page 489 and 490: 6.8. DUAL EDM CONE 489 6.8.1.7 Scho
- Page 491 and 492: 6.9. THEOREM OF THE ALTERNATIVE 491
- Page 493 and 494: 6.10. POSTSCRIPT 493 When D is an E
- Page 495 and 496: Chapter 7 Proximity problems In sum
- Page 497 and 498: 497 project on the subspace, then p
- Page 499 and 500: 499 H S N h 0 EDM N K = S N h ∩ R
- Page 501 and 502: 501 7.0.3 Problem approach Problems
- Page 503 and 504: 7.1. FIRST PREVALENT PROBLEM: 503 f
- Page 505 and 506: 7.1. FIRST PREVALENT PROBLEM: 505 7
- Page 507: 7.1. FIRST PREVALENT PROBLEM: 507 d
- Page 511 and 512: 7.1. FIRST PREVALENT PROBLEM: 511 w
- Page 513 and 514: 7.1. FIRST PREVALENT PROBLEM: 513 T
- Page 515 and 516: 7.2. SECOND PREVALENT PROBLEM: 515
- Page 517 and 518: 7.2. SECOND PREVALENT PROBLEM: 517
- Page 519 and 520: 7.2. SECOND PREVALENT PROBLEM: 519
- Page 521 and 522: 7.2. SECOND PREVALENT PROBLEM: 521
- Page 523 and 524: 7.2. SECOND PREVALENT PROBLEM: 523
- Page 525 and 526: 7.3. THIRD PREVALENT PROBLEM: 525 g
- Page 527 and 528: 7.3. THIRD PREVALENT PROBLEM: 527 w
- Page 529 and 530: 7.3. THIRD PREVALENT PROBLEM: 529 7
- Page 531 and 532: 7.3. THIRD PREVALENT PROBLEM: 531 7
- Page 533 and 534: 7.3. THIRD PREVALENT PROBLEM: 533 O
- Page 535 and 536: 7.4. CONCLUSION 535 The rank constr
- Page 537 and 538: Appendix A Linear algebra A.1 Main-
- Page 539 and 540: A.1. MAIN-DIAGONAL δ OPERATOR, λ
- Page 541 and 542: A.1. MAIN-DIAGONAL δ OPERATOR, λ
- Page 543 and 544: A.2. SEMIDEFINITENESS: DOMAIN OF TE
- Page 545 and 546: A.3. PROPER STATEMENTS 545 (AB) T
- Page 547 and 548: A.3. PROPER STATEMENTS 547 A.3.1 Se
- Page 549 and 550: A.3. PROPER STATEMENTS 549 For A di
- Page 551 and 552: A.3. PROPER STATEMENTS 551 Diagonal
- Page 553 and 554: A.3. PROPER STATEMENTS 553 For A,B
- Page 555 and 556: A.3. PROPER STATEMENTS 555 A.3.1.0.
- Page 557 and 558: A.4. SCHUR COMPLEMENT 557 A.4 Schur
7.1. FIRST PREVALENT PROBLEM: 509<br />
7.1.3.0.4 Corollary. Monotone nonnegative sort.<br />
Any given vectors σ,γ∈R N−1 satisfy a tight Euclidean distance inequality<br />
‖π(σ) − π(γ)‖ ≤ ‖σ − γ‖ (1235)<br />
where nonlinear function π(γ) sorts vector γ into nonincreasing order<br />
thereby providing the least lower bound with respect to every possible<br />
sorting.<br />
⋄<br />
Given γ ∈ R N−1<br />
inf<br />
σ∈R N−1<br />
+<br />
‖σ−γ‖ = inf<br />
σ∈R N−1<br />
+<br />
‖π(σ)−π(γ)‖ = inf<br />
σ∈R N−1<br />
+<br />
‖σ−π(γ)‖ = inf ‖σ−π(γ)‖<br />
σ∈K M+<br />
Yet for γ representing an arbitrary vector of eigenvalues, because<br />
(1236)<br />
inf<br />
[<br />
R<br />
ρ<br />
σ∈ +<br />
0<br />
]‖σ − γ‖ 2 ≥ inf<br />
[<br />
R<br />
ρ<br />
σ∈ +<br />
0<br />
]‖σ − π(γ)‖ 2 =<br />
inf<br />
[ ρ K<br />
σ∈ M+<br />
0<br />
]‖σ − π(γ)‖ 2 (1237)<br />
then projection of γ on the eigenspectra of a rank ρ subset can be tightened<br />
simply by presorting γ into nonincreasing order.<br />
Proof. Simply because π(γ) 1:ρ ≽ π(γ 1:ρ )<br />
inf<br />
[<br />
R<br />
ρ<br />
σ∈ +<br />
0<br />
inf<br />
[<br />
R<br />
ρ<br />
σ∈ +<br />
0<br />
]‖σ − γ‖ 2 = γ T ρ+1:N−1 γ ρ+1:N−1 + inf<br />
]‖σ − γ‖ 2 ≥ inf<br />
= γ T γ + inf<br />
σ∈R N−1<br />
+<br />
≥ γ T γ + inf<br />
σ∈R N−1<br />
+<br />
σ T 1:ρσ 1:ρ − 2σ T 1:ργ 1:ρ<br />
‖σ 1:ρ − γ 1:ρ ‖ 2<br />
σ1:ρσ T 1:ρ − 2σ T (1238)<br />
1:ρπ(γ) 1:ρ<br />
σ∈R N−1<br />
+<br />
[<br />
R<br />
ρ<br />
]‖σ − π(γ)‖ 2<br />
σ∈ +<br />
0