v2009.01.01 - Convex Optimization
v2009.01.01 - Convex Optimization v2009.01.01 - Convex Optimization
422 CHAPTER 5. EUCLIDEAN DISTANCE MATRIX Vertex-description of the dual spectral cone is, (284) K ∗ λ = K∗ M + [ R N + R − ] ∗ + ∂H ∗ ⊆ R N+1 = {[ A T B T 1 −1 ] b | b ≽ 0 } = From (1021) and (399) we get a halfspace-description: { } [ÂT ˆBT 1 −1] a | a ≽ 0 (1025) K ∗ λ = {y ∈ R N+1 | (V T N [ÂT ˆBT ]) † V T N y ≽ 0} (1026) This polyhedral dual spectral cone K ∗ λ is closed, convex, has nonempty interior because K λ is pointed, but is not pointed because K λ has empty interior. 5.11.2.3 Unordered eigenspectra Spectral cones are not unique; eigenspectra ordering can be rendered benign within a cone by presorting a vector of eigenvalues into nonincreasing order. 5.50 Then things simplify: Conditions (1012) now specify eigenvalue membership to the spectral cone ([ ]) [ ] 0 1 T R N λ 1 −EDM N + = ∩ ∂H R − = {ζ ∈ R N+1 | Bζ ≽ 0, 1 T ζ = 0} (1027) where B is defined in (1019), and ∂H in (1017). From (398) we get a vertex-description for a pointed spectral cone having empty interior: ([ ]) 0 1 T { λ 1 −EDM N = V N ( ˜BV } N ) † b | b ≽ 0 {[ ] } (1028) I = −1 T b | b ≽ 0 5.50 Eigenspectra ordering (represented by a cone having monotone description such as (1016)) becomes benign in (1237), for example, where projection of a given presorted vector on the nonnegative orthant in a subspace is equivalent to its projection on the monotone nonnegative cone in that same subspace; equivalence is a consequence of presorting.
5.11. EDM INDEFINITENESS 423 where V N ∈ R N+1×N and ˜B ∆ = ⎡ ⎢ ⎣ e T 1 e T2 . e T N ⎤ ⎥ ⎦ ∈ RN×N+1 (1029) holds only those rows of B corresponding to conically independent rows in BV N . For presorted eigenvalues, (1012) can be equivalently restated D ∈ EDM N ⇔ ([ ]) 0 1 T ∗ λ 1 −EDM N = ⎧ ([ ]) ⎪⎨ 0 1 T λ ∈ 1 −D ⎪⎩ D ∈ S N h [ ] R N + ∩ ∂H R − Vertex-description of the dual spectral cone is, (284) [ ] R N + + ∂H ∗ ⊆ R N+1 R − = {[ B T 1 −1 ] b | b ≽ 0 } = From (399) we get a halfspace-description: (1030) {[ } ˜BT 1 −1] a | a ≽ 0 (1031) ([ ]) 0 1 T ∗ λ 1 −EDM N = {y ∈ R N+1 | (VN T ˜B T ) † VN Ty ≽ 0} = {y ∈ R N+1 | [I −1 ]y ≽ 0} (1032) This polyhedral dual spectral cone is closed, convex, has nonempty interior but is not pointed. (Notice that any nonincreasingly ordered eigenspectrum belongs to this dual spectral cone.) 5.11.2.4 Dual cone versus dual spectral cone An open question regards the relationship of convex cones and their duals to the corresponding spectral cones and their duals. A positive semidefinite cone, for example, is self-dual. Both the nonnegative orthant and the monotone nonnegative cone are spectral cones for it. When we consider the nonnegative orthant, then that spectral cone for the self-dual positive semidefinite cone is also self-dual.
- Page 371 and 372: 5.4. EDM DEFINITION 371 10 5 ˇx 4
- Page 373 and 374: 5.4. EDM DEFINITION 373 corrected b
- Page 375 and 376: 5.4. EDM DEFINITION 375 by translat
- Page 377 and 378: 5.4. EDM DEFINITION 377 Crippen & H
- Page 379 and 380: 5.4. EDM DEFINITION 379 where ([√
- Page 381 and 382: 5.4. EDM DEFINITION 381 because (A.
- Page 383 and 384: 5.5. INVARIANCE 383 5.5.1.0.1 Examp
- Page 385 and 386: 5.5. INVARIANCE 385 x 2 x 2 x 3 x 1
- Page 387 and 388: 5.6. INJECTIVITY OF D & UNIQUE RECO
- Page 389 and 390: 5.6. INJECTIVITY OF D & UNIQUE RECO
- Page 391 and 392: 5.6. INJECTIVITY OF D & UNIQUE RECO
- Page 393 and 394: 5.7. EMBEDDING IN AFFINE HULL 393 5
- Page 395 and 396: 5.7. EMBEDDING IN AFFINE HULL 395 F
- Page 397 and 398: 5.7. EMBEDDING IN AFFINE HULL 397 5
- Page 399 and 400: 5.8. EUCLIDEAN METRIC VERSUS MATRIX
- Page 401 and 402: 5.8. EUCLIDEAN METRIC VERSUS MATRIX
- Page 403 and 404: 5.8. EUCLIDEAN METRIC VERSUS MATRIX
- Page 405 and 406: 5.8. EUCLIDEAN METRIC VERSUS MATRIX
- Page 407 and 408: 5.9. BRIDGE: CONVEX POLYHEDRA TO ED
- Page 409 and 410: 5.9. BRIDGE: CONVEX POLYHEDRA TO ED
- Page 411 and 412: 5.9. BRIDGE: CONVEX POLYHEDRA TO ED
- Page 413 and 414: 5.10. EDM-ENTRY COMPOSITION 413 of
- Page 415 and 416: 5.10. EDM-ENTRY COMPOSITION 415 The
- Page 417 and 418: 5.11. EDM INDEFINITENESS 417 5.11.1
- Page 419 and 420: 5.11. EDM INDEFINITENESS 419 we hav
- Page 421: 5.11. EDM INDEFINITENESS 421 So bec
- Page 425 and 426: 5.12. LIST RECONSTRUCTION 425 where
- Page 427 and 428: 5.12. LIST RECONSTRUCTION 427 (a) (
- Page 429 and 430: 5.13. RECONSTRUCTION EXAMPLES 429 D
- Page 431 and 432: 5.13. RECONSTRUCTION EXAMPLES 431 T
- Page 433 and 434: 5.13. RECONSTRUCTION EXAMPLES 433 w
- Page 435 and 436: 5.14. FIFTH PROPERTY OF EUCLIDEAN M
- Page 437 and 438: 5.14. FIFTH PROPERTY OF EUCLIDEAN M
- Page 439 and 440: 5.14. FIFTH PROPERTY OF EUCLIDEAN M
- Page 441 and 442: 5.14. FIFTH PROPERTY OF EUCLIDEAN M
- Page 443 and 444: 5.14. FIFTH PROPERTY OF EUCLIDEAN M
- Page 445 and 446: Chapter 6 Cone of distance matrices
- Page 447 and 448: 6.1. DEFINING EDM CONE 447 6.1 Defi
- Page 449 and 450: 6.2. POLYHEDRAL BOUNDS 449 This con
- Page 451 and 452: 6.3. √ EDM CONE IS NOT CONVEX 451
- Page 453 and 454: 6.4. A GEOMETRY OF COMPLETION 453 (
- Page 455 and 456: 6.4. A GEOMETRY OF COMPLETION 455 (
- Page 457 and 458: 6.4. A GEOMETRY OF COMPLETION 457 F
- Page 459 and 460: 6.5. EDM DEFINITION IN 11 T 459 by
- Page 461 and 462: 6.5. EDM DEFINITION IN 11 T 461 6.5
- Page 463 and 464: 6.5. EDM DEFINITION IN 11 T 463 1 0
- Page 465 and 466: 6.5. EDM DEFINITION IN 11 T 465 6.5
- Page 467 and 468: 6.6. CORRESPONDENCE TO PSD CONE S N
- Page 469 and 470: 6.6. CORRESPONDENCE TO PSD CONE S N
- Page 471 and 472: 6.6. CORRESPONDENCE TO PSD CONE S N
422 CHAPTER 5. EUCLIDEAN DISTANCE MATRIX<br />
Vertex-description of the dual spectral cone is, (284)<br />
K ∗ λ = K∗ M + [<br />
R<br />
N<br />
+<br />
R −<br />
] ∗<br />
+ ∂H ∗ ⊆ R N+1<br />
= {[ A T B T 1 −1 ] b | b ≽ 0 } =<br />
From (1021) and (399) we get a halfspace-description:<br />
{ }<br />
[ÂT ˆBT 1 −1]<br />
a | a ≽ 0<br />
(1025)<br />
K ∗ λ = {y ∈ R N+1 | (V T N [ÂT ˆBT ]) † V T N y ≽ 0} (1026)<br />
This polyhedral dual spectral cone K ∗ λ is closed, convex, has nonempty<br />
interior because K λ is pointed, but is not pointed because K λ has empty<br />
interior.<br />
5.11.2.3 Unordered eigenspectra<br />
Spectral cones are not unique; eigenspectra ordering can be rendered benign<br />
within a cone by presorting a vector of eigenvalues into nonincreasing<br />
order. 5.50 Then things simplify: Conditions (1012) now specify eigenvalue<br />
membership to the spectral cone<br />
([ ]) [ ]<br />
0 1<br />
T R<br />
N<br />
λ<br />
1 −EDM N +<br />
= ∩ ∂H<br />
R −<br />
= {ζ ∈ R N+1 | Bζ ≽ 0, 1 T ζ = 0}<br />
(1027)<br />
where B is defined in (1019), and ∂H in (1017). From (398) we get a<br />
vertex-description for a pointed spectral cone having empty interior:<br />
([ ])<br />
0 1<br />
T {<br />
λ<br />
1 −EDM N = V N ( ˜BV<br />
}<br />
N ) † b | b ≽ 0<br />
{[ ] } (1028)<br />
I<br />
=<br />
−1 T b | b ≽ 0<br />
5.50 Eigenspectra ordering (represented by a cone having monotone description such as<br />
(1016)) becomes benign in (1237), for example, where projection of a given presorted vector<br />
on the nonnegative orthant in a subspace is equivalent to its projection on the monotone<br />
nonnegative cone in that same subspace; equivalence is a consequence of presorting.