10.03.2015 Views

v2009.01.01 - Convex Optimization

v2009.01.01 - Convex Optimization

v2009.01.01 - Convex Optimization

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

5.4. EDM DEFINITION 373<br />

corrected by choosing a different normal for the linear objective function,<br />

now implicitly the identity matrix I ; id est,<br />

trG = 〈G , I 〉 ← 〈G , δ(u)〉 (850)<br />

where vector u ∈ R 5 is randomly selected. A random search for a good<br />

normal δ(u) in only a few iterations is quite easy and effective because<br />

the problem is small, an optimal solution is known a priori to exist in two<br />

dimensions, a good normal direction is not necessarily unique, and (we<br />

speculate) because the feasible affine-subset slices the positive semidefinite<br />

cone thinly in the Euclidean sense. 5.16<br />

<br />

We explore ramifications of noise and incomplete data throughout; their<br />

individual effect being to expand the optimal solution set, introducing more<br />

solutions and higher-rank solutions. Hence our focus shifts in4.4 to<br />

discovery of a reliable means for diminishing the optimal solution set by<br />

introduction of a rank constraint.<br />

Now we illustrate how a problem in distance geometry can be solved<br />

without equality constraints representing measured distance; instead, we<br />

have only upper and lower bounds on distances measured:<br />

5.4.2.2.8 Example. Wireless location in a cellular telephone network.<br />

Utilizing measurements of distance, time of flight, angle of arrival, or signal<br />

power, multilateration is the process of localizing (determining absolute<br />

position of) a radio signal source • by inferring geometry relative to multiple<br />

fixed base stations ◦ whose locations are known.<br />

We consider localization of a cellular telephone by distance geometry,<br />

so we assume distance to any particular base station can be inferred from<br />

received signal power. On a large open flat expanse of terrain, signal-power<br />

measurement corresponds well with inverse distance. But it is not uncommon<br />

for measurement of signal power to suffer 20 decibels in loss caused by factors<br />

such as multipath interference (signal reflections), mountainous terrain,<br />

man-made structures, turning one’s head, or rolling the windows up in an<br />

automobile. Consequently, contours of equal signal power are no longer<br />

circular; their geometry is irregular and would more aptly be approximated<br />

5.16 The log det rank-heuristic from7.2.2.4 does not work here because it chooses the<br />

wrong normal. Rank reduction (4.1.1.2) is unsuccessful here because Barvinok’s upper<br />

bound (2.9.3.0.1) on rank of G ⋆ is 4.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!