10.03.2015 Views

v2009.01.01 - Convex Optimization

v2009.01.01 - Convex Optimization

v2009.01.01 - Convex Optimization

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

372 CHAPTER 5. EUCLIDEAN DISTANCE MATRIX<br />

5.4.2.2.7 Example. Tandem trilateration in wireless sensor network.<br />

Given three known absolute point-positions in R 2 (three anchors ˇx 3 , ˇx 4 , ˇx 5 )<br />

and two unknown sensors x 1 , x 2 ∈ R 2 , the sensors’ absolute positions are<br />

determinable from their noiseless distances-square (as indicated in Figure 99)<br />

assuming the anchors exhibit no rotational or reflective symmetry in their<br />

affine hull (5.5.2). This example differs from Example 5.4.2.2.4 in so far<br />

as trilateration of each sensor is now in terms of one unknown position, the<br />

other sensor. We express this localization as a convex optimization problem<br />

(a semidefinite program,4.1) in terms of list X ∆ = [x 1 x 2 ˇx 3 ˇx 4 ˇx 5 ]∈ R 2×5<br />

and Gram matrix G∈ S 5 (807) via relaxation (842):<br />

minimize trG<br />

G∈S 5 , X∈R2×5 subject to tr(GΦ i1 ) = ďi1 , i = 2, 4, 5<br />

tr(GΦ i2 ) = ďi2 , i = 3, 5<br />

tr ( )<br />

Ge i e T i = ‖ˇx i ‖ 2 , i = 3, 4, 5<br />

tr(G(e i e T j + e j e T i )/2) = ˇx T i ˇx j , 3 ≤ i < j = 4, 5<br />

X(:, 3:5) = [ ˇx 3 ˇx 4 ˇx 5 ]<br />

[ ] I X<br />

X T<br />

≽ 0<br />

G<br />

(849)<br />

where<br />

Φ ij = (e i − e j )(e i − e j ) T ∈ S N + (796)<br />

This problem realization is fragile because of the unknown distances between<br />

sensors and anchors. Yet there is no more information we may include beyond<br />

the 11 independent equality constraints on the Gram matrix (nonredundant<br />

constraints not antithetical) to reduce the feasible set 5.14 . (By virtue of their<br />

dimensioning, the sensors are already constrained to R 2 the affine hull of the<br />

anchors.)<br />

Exhibited in Figure 100 are two mistakes in solution X ⋆ (:,1:2) due<br />

to a rank-3 optimal Gram matrix G ⋆ . The trace objective is a heuristic<br />

minimizing convex envelope of quasiconcave function 5.15 rankG. (2.9.2.6.2,<br />

7.2.2.1) A rank-2 optimal Gram matrix can be found and the errors<br />

5.14 the presumably nonempty convex set of all points G and X satisfying the constraints.<br />

5.15 Projection on that nonconvex subset of all N ×N-dimensional positive semidefinite<br />

matrices, in an affine subset, whose rank does not exceed 2 is a problem considered difficult<br />

to solve. [306,4]

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!