10.03.2015 Views

v2009.01.01 - Convex Optimization

v2009.01.01 - Convex Optimization

v2009.01.01 - Convex Optimization

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

4.1. CONIC PROBLEM 253<br />

Proposition 2.9.3.0.1, the upper bound on rank of X existent in the feasible<br />

set P is satisfied by an extreme point. The upper bound on rank of an<br />

optimal solution X ⋆ existent in F(P) is thereby also satisfied by an extreme<br />

point of P precisely because {X ⋆ } constitutes F(P) ; 4.4 in particular,<br />

{X ⋆ ∈ P | rankX ⋆ ≤ 1} = {Γ 1 , Γ 2 } ⊆ F(P) (593)<br />

As all linear functions on a polyhedron are minimized on a face, [82] [217]<br />

[238] [241] by analogy we so demonstrate coexistence of optimal solutions X ⋆<br />

of (584P) having assorted rank.<br />

<br />

4.1.1.4 Previous work<br />

Barvinok showed [23,2.2] when given a positive definite matrix C and an<br />

arbitrarily small neighborhood of C comprising positive definite matrices,<br />

there exists a matrix ˜C from that neighborhood such that optimal solution<br />

X ⋆ to (584P) (substituting ˜C) is an extreme point of A ∩ S n + and satisfies<br />

upper bound (245). 4.5 Given arbitrary positive definite C , this means<br />

nothing inherently guarantees that an optimal solution X ⋆ to problem (584P)<br />

satisfies (245); certainly nothing given any symmetric matrix C , as the<br />

problem is posed. This can be proved by example:<br />

4.1.1.4.1 Example. (Ye) Maximal Complementarity.<br />

Assume dimension n to be an even positive number. Then the particular<br />

instance of problem (584P),<br />

minimize<br />

X∈ S n 〈[ I 0<br />

0 2I<br />

subject to X ≽ 0<br />

〈I , X〉 = n<br />

] 〉<br />

, X<br />

(594)<br />

has optimal solution<br />

X ⋆ =<br />

[ 2I 0<br />

0 0<br />

]<br />

∈ S n (595)<br />

4.4 and every face contains a subset of the extreme points of P by the extreme<br />

existence theorem (2.6.0.0.2). This means: because the affine subset A and hyperplane<br />

{X | 〈C , X 〉 = f ⋆ 0 } must intersect a whole face of P , calculation of an upper bound on<br />

rank of X ⋆ ignores counting the hyperplane when determining m in (245).<br />

4.5 Further, the set of all such ˜C in that neighborhood is open and dense.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!