10.03.2015 Views

v2009.01.01 - Convex Optimization

v2009.01.01 - Convex Optimization

v2009.01.01 - Convex Optimization

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

214 CHAPTER 3. GEOMETRY OF CONVEX FUNCTIONS<br />

Necessity is proven: [53, exer.3.60] Given any (X, u), (Y , v)∈ epif , we<br />

must show for all µ∈[0, 1] that µ(X, u) + (1−µ)(Y , v)∈ epif ; id est, we<br />

must show<br />

f(µX + (1−µ)Y ) ≼<br />

µu + (1−µ)v (495)<br />

R M +<br />

Yet this holds by definition because f(µX+(1−µ)Y ) ≼ µf(X)+(1−µ)f(Y ).<br />

The converse also holds.<br />

<br />

3.1.7.0.1 Exercise. Epigraph sufficiency.<br />

Prove that converse: Given any (X, u), (Y , v)∈ epif , if for all µ∈[0, 1]<br />

µ(X, u) + (1−µ)(Y , v)∈ epif holds, then f must be convex. <br />

Sublevel sets of a real convex function are convex. Likewise, corresponding<br />

to each and every ν ∈ R M<br />

L ν f ∆ = {X ∈ domf | f(X) ≼<br />

ν } ⊆ R p×k (496)<br />

R M +<br />

sublevel sets of a vector-valued convex function are convex. As for real<br />

functions, the converse does not hold. (Figure 65)<br />

To prove necessity of convex sublevel sets: For any X,Y ∈ L ν f we must<br />

show for each and every µ∈[0, 1] that µX + (1−µ)Y ∈ L ν f . By definition,<br />

f(µX + (1−µ)Y ) ≼<br />

R M +<br />

µf(X) + (1−µ)f(Y ) ≼<br />

R M +<br />

ν (497)<br />

<br />

When an epigraph (493) is artificially bounded above, t ≼ ν , then the<br />

corresponding sublevel set can be regarded as an orthogonal projection of<br />

the epigraph on the function domain.<br />

Sense of the inequality is reversed in (493), for concave functions, and we<br />

use instead the nomenclature hypograph. Sense of the inequality in (496) is<br />

reversed, similarly, with each convex set then called superlevel set.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!