v2009.01.01 - Convex Optimization
v2009.01.01 - Convex Optimization v2009.01.01 - Convex Optimization
144 CHAPTER 2. CONVEX GEOMETRY K K ∗ 0 Figure 50: K is a halfspace about the origin in R 2 . K ∗ is a ray base 0, hence has empty interior in R 2 ; so K cannot be pointed. (Both convex cones appear truncated.) 2.13.1.0.2 Exercise. Dual cone definitions. What is {x∈ R n | x T z ≥0 ∀z∈R n } ? What is {x∈ R n | x T z ≥1 ∀z∈R n } ? What is {x∈ R n | x T z ≥1 ∀z∈R n +} ? As defined, dual cone K ∗ exists even when the affine hull of the original cone is a proper subspace; id est, even when the original cone has empty interior. Rockafellar formulates the dimension of K and K ∗ . [266,14] 2.52 To further motivate our understanding of the dual cone, consider the ease with which convergence can be observed in the following optimization problem (p): 2.13.1.0.3 Example. Dual problem. (confer4.1) Duality is a powerful and widely employed tool in applied mathematics for a number of reasons. First, the dual program is always convex even if the primal is not. Second, the number of variables in the dual is equal to the number of constraints in the primal which is often less than the number of 2.52 His monumental work Convex Analysis has not one figure or illustration. See [25,II.16] for a good illustration of Rockafellar’s recession cone [37].
2.13. DUAL CONE & GENERALIZED INEQUALITY 145 f(x, z p ) or f(x) f(x p , z) or g(z) x z Figure 51: Although objective functions from conic problems (275p) and (275d) are linear, this is a mnemonic icon for primal and dual problems. When problems are strong duals, duality gap is 0 ; meaning, functions f(x) and g(z) (dotted) kiss at saddle value, as depicted at center. Otherwise, dual functions never meet (f(x) > g(z)) by (273). Drawing by Kieff.
- Page 93 and 94: 2.7. CONES 93 Then a pointed closed
- Page 95 and 96: 2.7. CONES 95 A pointed closed conv
- Page 97 and 98: 2.8. CONE BOUNDARY 97 So the ray th
- Page 99 and 100: 2.8. CONE BOUNDARY 99 2.8.1.1 extre
- Page 101 and 102: 2.8. CONE BOUNDARY 101 2.8.2 Expose
- Page 103 and 104: 2.8. CONE BOUNDARY 103 From Theorem
- Page 105 and 106: 2.9. POSITIVE SEMIDEFINITE (PSD) CO
- Page 107 and 108: 2.9. POSITIVE SEMIDEFINITE (PSD) CO
- Page 109 and 110: 2.9. POSITIVE SEMIDEFINITE (PSD) CO
- Page 111 and 112: 2.9. POSITIVE SEMIDEFINITE (PSD) CO
- Page 113 and 114: 2.9. POSITIVE SEMIDEFINITE (PSD) CO
- Page 115 and 116: 2.9. POSITIVE SEMIDEFINITE (PSD) CO
- Page 117 and 118: 2.9. POSITIVE SEMIDEFINITE (PSD) CO
- Page 119 and 120: 2.9. POSITIVE SEMIDEFINITE (PSD) CO
- Page 121 and 122: 2.9. POSITIVE SEMIDEFINITE (PSD) CO
- Page 123 and 124: 2.9. POSITIVE SEMIDEFINITE (PSD) CO
- Page 125 and 126: 2.9. POSITIVE SEMIDEFINITE (PSD) CO
- Page 127 and 128: 2.10. CONIC INDEPENDENCE (C.I.) 127
- Page 129 and 130: 2.10. CONIC INDEPENDENCE (C.I.) 129
- Page 131 and 132: 2.10. CONIC INDEPENDENCE (C.I.) 131
- Page 133 and 134: 2.12. CONVEX POLYHEDRA 133 It follo
- Page 135 and 136: 2.12. CONVEX POLYHEDRA 135 Coeffici
- Page 137 and 138: 2.12. CONVEX POLYHEDRA 137 2.12.3 U
- Page 139 and 140: 2.12. CONVEX POLYHEDRA 139
- Page 141 and 142: 2.13. DUAL CONE & GENERALIZED INEQU
- Page 143: 2.13. DUAL CONE & GENERALIZED INEQU
- Page 147 and 148: 2.13. DUAL CONE & GENERALIZED INEQU
- Page 149 and 150: 2.13. DUAL CONE & GENERALIZED INEQU
- Page 151 and 152: 2.13. DUAL CONE & GENERALIZED INEQU
- Page 153 and 154: 2.13. DUAL CONE & GENERALIZED INEQU
- Page 155 and 156: 2.13. DUAL CONE & GENERALIZED INEQU
- Page 157 and 158: 2.13. DUAL CONE & GENERALIZED INEQU
- Page 159 and 160: 2.13. DUAL CONE & GENERALIZED INEQU
- Page 161 and 162: 2.13. DUAL CONE & GENERALIZED INEQU
- Page 163 and 164: 2.13. DUAL CONE & GENERALIZED INEQU
- Page 165 and 166: 2.13. DUAL CONE & GENERALIZED INEQU
- Page 167 and 168: 2.13. DUAL CONE & GENERALIZED INEQU
- Page 169 and 170: 2.13. DUAL CONE & GENERALIZED INEQU
- Page 171 and 172: 2.13. DUAL CONE & GENERALIZED INEQU
- Page 173 and 174: 2.13. DUAL CONE & GENERALIZED INEQU
- Page 175 and 176: 2.13. DUAL CONE & GENERALIZED INEQU
- Page 177 and 178: 2.13. DUAL CONE & GENERALIZED INEQU
- Page 179 and 180: 2.13. DUAL CONE & GENERALIZED INEQU
- Page 181 and 182: 2.13. DUAL CONE & GENERALIZED INEQU
- Page 183 and 184: 2.13. DUAL CONE & GENERALIZED INEQU
- Page 185 and 186: 2.13. DUAL CONE & GENERALIZED INEQU
- Page 187 and 188: 2.13. DUAL CONE & GENERALIZED INEQU
- Page 189 and 190: 2.13. DUAL CONE & GENERALIZED INEQU
- Page 191 and 192: 2.13. DUAL CONE & GENERALIZED INEQU
- Page 193 and 194: 2.13. DUAL CONE & GENERALIZED INEQU
144 CHAPTER 2. CONVEX GEOMETRY<br />
K<br />
K ∗<br />
0<br />
Figure 50: K is a halfspace about the origin in R 2 . K ∗ is a ray base 0,<br />
hence has empty interior in R 2 ; so K cannot be pointed. (Both convex<br />
cones appear truncated.)<br />
2.13.1.0.2 Exercise. Dual cone definitions.<br />
What is {x∈ R n | x T z ≥0 ∀z∈R n } ?<br />
What is {x∈ R n | x T z ≥1 ∀z∈R n } ?<br />
What is {x∈ R n | x T z ≥1 ∀z∈R n +} ?<br />
<br />
As defined, dual cone K ∗ exists even when the affine hull of the original<br />
cone is a proper subspace; id est, even when the original cone has empty<br />
interior. Rockafellar formulates the dimension of K and K ∗ . [266,14] 2.52<br />
To further motivate our understanding of the dual cone, consider the<br />
ease with which convergence can be observed in the following optimization<br />
problem (p):<br />
2.13.1.0.3 Example. Dual problem. (confer4.1)<br />
Duality is a powerful and widely employed tool in applied mathematics for<br />
a number of reasons. First, the dual program is always convex even if the<br />
primal is not. Second, the number of variables in the dual is equal to the<br />
number of constraints in the primal which is often less than the number of<br />
2.52 His monumental work <strong>Convex</strong> Analysis has not one figure or illustration. See<br />
[25,II.16] for a good illustration of Rockafellar’s recession cone [37].