10.03.2015 Views

v2009.01.01 - Convex Optimization

v2009.01.01 - Convex Optimization

v2009.01.01 - Convex Optimization

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

140 CHAPTER 2. CONVEX GEOMETRY<br />

2.12.4 Converting between descriptions<br />

Conversion between halfspace-descriptions (258) (259) and equivalent<br />

vertex-descriptions (78) (262) is nontrivial, in general, [14] [96,2.2] but the<br />

conversion is easy for simplices. [53,2.2] Nonetheless, we tacitly assume the<br />

two descriptions to be equivalent. [266,19, thm.19.1] We explore conversions<br />

in2.13.4,2.13.9, and2.13.11:<br />

2.13 Dual cone & generalized inequality<br />

& biorthogonal expansion<br />

These three concepts, dual cone, generalized inequality, and biorthogonal<br />

expansion, are inextricably melded; meaning, it is difficult to completely<br />

discuss one without mentioning the others. The dual cone is critical in tests<br />

for convergence by contemporary primal/dual methods for numerical solution<br />

of conic problems. [342] [239,4.5] For unique minimum-distance projection<br />

on a closed convex cone K , the negative dual cone −K ∗ plays the role that<br />

orthogonal complement plays for subspace projection. 2.50 (E.9.2.1) Indeed,<br />

−K ∗ is the algebraic complement in R n ;<br />

K ⊞ −K ∗ = R n (269)<br />

where ⊞ denotes unique orthogonal vector sum.<br />

One way to think of a pointed closed convex cone is as a new kind of<br />

coordinate system whose basis is generally nonorthogonal; a conic system,<br />

very much like the familiar Cartesian system whose analogous cone is the<br />

first quadrant (the nonnegative orthant). Generalized inequality ≽ K is a<br />

formalized means to determine membership to any pointed closed convex<br />

cone K (2.7.2.2) whereas biorthogonal expansion is, fundamentally, an<br />

expression of coordinates in a pointed conic system whose axes are linearly<br />

independent but not necessarily orthogonal. When cone K is the nonnegative<br />

orthant, then these three concepts come into alignment with the Cartesian<br />

prototype: biorthogonal expansion becomes orthogonal expansion, the dual<br />

cone becomes identical to the orthant, and generalized inequality obeys a<br />

total order entrywise.<br />

2.50 Namely, projection on a subspace is ascertainable from its projection on the orthogonal<br />

complement.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!