v2009.01.01 - Convex Optimization
v2009.01.01 - Convex Optimization v2009.01.01 - Convex Optimization
110 CHAPTER 2. CONVEX GEOMETRY √ 2β svec S 2 + (a) (b) α [ α β β γ ] Figure 39: (a) Projection of the PSD cone S 2 + , truncated above γ =1, on αβ-plane in isometrically isomorphic R 3 . View is from above with respect to Figure 37. (b) Truncated above γ =2. From these plots we may infer, for example, the line { [ 0 1/ √ 2 γ ] T | γ ∈ R } intercepts the PSD cone at some large value of γ ; in fact, γ =∞ .
2.9. POSITIVE SEMIDEFINITE (PSD) CONE 111 2.9.2.1 rank ρ subset of the positive semidefinite cone For the same reason (closure), this applies more generally; for 0≤ρ≤M { A ∈ S M + | rankA=ρ } = { A ∈ S M + | rankA≤ρ } (198) For easy reference, we give such generally nonconvex sets a name: rank ρ subset of a positive semidefinite cone. For ρ < M this subset, nonconvex for M > 1, resides on the positive semidefinite cone boundary. 2.9.2.1.1 Exercise. Closure and rank ρ subset. Prove equality in (198). For example, ∂S M + = { A ∈ S M + | rankA=M− 1 } = { A ∈ S M + | rankA≤M− 1 } (199) In S 2 , each and every ray on the boundary of the positive semidefinite cone in isomorphic R 3 corresponds to a symmetric rank-1 matrix (Figure 37), but that does not hold in any higher dimension. 2.9.2.2 Subspace tangent to open rank-ρ subset When the positive semidefinite cone subset in (198) is left unclosed as in M(ρ) ∆ = { A ∈ S M + | rankA=ρ } (200) then we can specify a subspace tangent to the positive semidefinite cone at a particular member of manifold M(ρ). Specifically, the subspace R M tangent to manifold M(ρ) at B ∈ M(ρ) [160,5, prop.1.1] R M (B) ∆ = {XB + BX T | X ∈ R M×M } ⊆ S M (201) has dimension ( dim svec R M (B) = ρ M − ρ − 1 ) = ρ(M − ρ) + 2 ρ(ρ + 1) 2 (202) Tangent subspace R M contains no member of the positive semidefinite cone S M + whose rank exceeds ρ . Subspace R M (B) is a supporting hyperplane when B ∈ M(M −1). Another good example of tangent subspace is given inE.7.2.0.2 by (1876); R M (11 T ) = S M⊥ c , orthogonal complement to the geometric center subspace. (Figure 124, p.480)
- Page 59 and 60: 2.3. HULLS 59 2.3.2 Convex hull The
- Page 61 and 62: 2.3. HULLS 61 In case k = N , the F
- Page 63 and 64: 2.3. HULLS 63 2.3.2.0.3 Exercise. C
- Page 65 and 66: 2.3. HULLS 65 Figure 20: A simplici
- Page 67 and 68: 2.4. HALFSPACE, HYPERPLANE 67 H + a
- Page 69 and 70: 2.4. HALFSPACE, HYPERPLANE 69 1 1
- Page 71 and 72: 2.4. HALFSPACE, HYPERPLANE 71 Recal
- Page 73 and 74: 2.4. HALFSPACE, HYPERPLANE 73 C H
- Page 75 and 76: 2.4. HALFSPACE, HYPERPLANE 75 2.4.2
- Page 77 and 78: 2.4. HALFSPACE, HYPERPLANE 77 (conf
- Page 79 and 80: 2.5. SUBSPACE REPRESENTATIONS 79 Ra
- Page 81 and 82: 2.5. SUBSPACE REPRESENTATIONS 81 If
- Page 83 and 84: 2.6. EXTREME, EXPOSED 83 2.6 Extrem
- Page 85 and 86: 2.6. EXTREME, EXPOSED 85 A B C D Fi
- Page 87 and 88: 2.7. CONES 87 2.6.1.3.1 Definition.
- Page 89 and 90: 2.7. CONES 89 0 Figure 30: Boundary
- Page 91 and 92: 2.7. CONES 91 2.7.2 Convex cone We
- Page 93 and 94: 2.7. CONES 93 Then a pointed closed
- Page 95 and 96: 2.7. CONES 95 A pointed closed conv
- Page 97 and 98: 2.8. CONE BOUNDARY 97 So the ray th
- Page 99 and 100: 2.8. CONE BOUNDARY 99 2.8.1.1 extre
- Page 101 and 102: 2.8. CONE BOUNDARY 101 2.8.2 Expose
- Page 103 and 104: 2.8. CONE BOUNDARY 103 From Theorem
- Page 105 and 106: 2.9. POSITIVE SEMIDEFINITE (PSD) CO
- Page 107 and 108: 2.9. POSITIVE SEMIDEFINITE (PSD) CO
- Page 109: 2.9. POSITIVE SEMIDEFINITE (PSD) CO
- Page 113 and 114: 2.9. POSITIVE SEMIDEFINITE (PSD) CO
- Page 115 and 116: 2.9. POSITIVE SEMIDEFINITE (PSD) CO
- Page 117 and 118: 2.9. POSITIVE SEMIDEFINITE (PSD) CO
- Page 119 and 120: 2.9. POSITIVE SEMIDEFINITE (PSD) CO
- Page 121 and 122: 2.9. POSITIVE SEMIDEFINITE (PSD) CO
- Page 123 and 124: 2.9. POSITIVE SEMIDEFINITE (PSD) CO
- Page 125 and 126: 2.9. POSITIVE SEMIDEFINITE (PSD) CO
- Page 127 and 128: 2.10. CONIC INDEPENDENCE (C.I.) 127
- Page 129 and 130: 2.10. CONIC INDEPENDENCE (C.I.) 129
- Page 131 and 132: 2.10. CONIC INDEPENDENCE (C.I.) 131
- Page 133 and 134: 2.12. CONVEX POLYHEDRA 133 It follo
- Page 135 and 136: 2.12. CONVEX POLYHEDRA 135 Coeffici
- Page 137 and 138: 2.12. CONVEX POLYHEDRA 137 2.12.3 U
- Page 139 and 140: 2.12. CONVEX POLYHEDRA 139
- Page 141 and 142: 2.13. DUAL CONE & GENERALIZED INEQU
- Page 143 and 144: 2.13. DUAL CONE & GENERALIZED INEQU
- Page 145 and 146: 2.13. DUAL CONE & GENERALIZED INEQU
- Page 147 and 148: 2.13. DUAL CONE & GENERALIZED INEQU
- Page 149 and 150: 2.13. DUAL CONE & GENERALIZED INEQU
- Page 151 and 152: 2.13. DUAL CONE & GENERALIZED INEQU
- Page 153 and 154: 2.13. DUAL CONE & GENERALIZED INEQU
- Page 155 and 156: 2.13. DUAL CONE & GENERALIZED INEQU
- Page 157 and 158: 2.13. DUAL CONE & GENERALIZED INEQU
- Page 159 and 160: 2.13. DUAL CONE & GENERALIZED INEQU
110 CHAPTER 2. CONVEX GEOMETRY<br />
√<br />
2β<br />
svec S 2 +<br />
(a)<br />
(b)<br />
α<br />
[ α β<br />
β γ<br />
]<br />
Figure 39: (a) Projection of the PSD cone S 2 + , truncated above γ =1, on<br />
αβ-plane in isometrically isomorphic R 3 . View is from above with respect to<br />
Figure 37. (b) Truncated above γ =2. From these plots we may infer, for<br />
example, the line { [ 0 1/ √ 2 γ ] T | γ ∈ R } intercepts the PSD cone at some<br />
large value of γ ; in fact, γ =∞ .