sparse image representation via combined transforms - Convex ...
sparse image representation via combined transforms - Convex ... sparse image representation via combined transforms - Convex ...
138 APPENDIX A. DIRECT EDGELET TRANSFORM (a) Huo image (b) Largest−200 coeff. (c) Largest−400 coeff. 10 20 30 40 50 60 20 40 60 10 20 30 40 50 60 20 40 60 10 20 30 40 50 60 20 40 60 (d) Edgelet trans. coeff.(largest−10000/26752) 1.4 1.2 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 0 5000 10000 10 20 30 40 50 60 (e) Largest−800 coeff. 20 40 60 10 20 30 40 50 60 (f) Largest−1600 coeff. 20 40 60 Figure A.1: Edgelet transform of the Chinese character “Huo”: (a) is the original; (d) is the sorted coefficients; (b), (c), (e) and (f) are reconstructions based on the largest 200, 400, 800, 1600 coefficients, respectively. The reason to do this is that both of them show some patchy patterns in the original images. The filtered images show more obvious edge features. See Figure A.2 (b) and Figure A.4 (b). A.3 Details . A direct way of computing edgelet coefficients is explained. It is direct in the sense that every single edgelet coefficient is computed by a direct method; the coefficient is a weighted sum of the pixel values (intensities) that the edgelet trespasses. For an N × N image, the order of the complexity of the direct method is O(N 3 log N). Section A.3.1 gives the definition of the direct edgelet transform. Section A.3.2 calculates the cardinality of the edgelet system. Section A.3.3 specifies the ordering. Section A.3.4
A.3. DETAILS 139 (a) Stick image (b) Filtered stick image (c) Edgelet trans. coeff.(largest−10000/362496) 5 20 20 4 40 60 40 60 3 80 80 2 100 120 20 40 60 80 100 120 100 120 20 40 60 80 100 120 1 0 0 5000 10000 (d) Edgelets assoc. with largest−100 coeff. (e) Largest−300 coeff. (f) Largest−500 coeff. 20 20 20 40 40 40 60 60 60 80 80 80 100 100 100 120 20 40 60 80 100 120 120 20 40 60 80 100 120 120 20 40 60 80 100 120 Figure A.2: Edgelet transform of the sticky image: (a) is the original; (b) is the filtered image; (c) is the sorted coefficients; (d), (e) and (f) are the reconstructions based on the largest 100, 300 and 500 coefficients, respectively. explains how to compute a single edgelet coefficient. Section A.3.5 shows how to do the adjoint transform. A.3.1 Definition In this subsection, we define what a direct edgelet transform is. For continuous functions, the edgelet transform is defined in [50]. But in modern computing practice, an image is digitalized: it is a discrete function, or a matrix. There are many possibilities to realize the edgelet transform for a matrix, due to many ways to interpolate a matrix as a continuous 2-D function. We explain a way of interpolation. Suppose the image is a squared image having N rows and N columns. The total number of pixels is N 2 . We assume N is a power of 2, N =2 n . Let the matrix I = I(i, j) 1≤i,j≤N ∈ R N×N correspond to the digital image,
- Page 115 and 116: 4.4. LAGRANGE MULTIPLIERS 87 ρ( x
- Page 117 and 118: 4.5. HOW TO CHOOSE ρ AND λ 89 3 (
- Page 119 and 120: 4.6. HOMOTOPY 91 A way to interpret
- Page 121 and 122: 4.7. NEWTON DIRECTION 93 4.7 Newton
- Page 123 and 124: 4.9. ITERATIVE METHODS 95 1. Avoidi
- Page 125 and 126: 4.11. DISCUSSION 97 ρ(β) =‖β
- Page 127 and 128: 4.12. PROOFS 99 4.12.2 Proof of The
- Page 129 and 130: 4.12. PROOFS 101 case of (4.16). Co
- Page 131 and 132: Chapter 5 Iterative Methods This ch
- Page 133 and 134: 5.1. OVERVIEW 105 the k-th iteratio
- Page 135 and 136: 5.1. OVERVIEW 107 5.1.4 Preconditio
- Page 137 and 138: 5.2. LSQR 109 among all the block d
- Page 139 and 140: 5.2. LSQR 111 5.2.3 Algorithm LSQR
- Page 141 and 142: 5.3. MINRES 113 2. For k =1, 2,...,
- Page 143 and 144: 5.3. MINRES 115 using the precondit
- Page 145 and 146: 5.4. DISCUSSION 117 From (I + S 1 )
- Page 147 and 148: Chapter 6 Simulations Section 6.1 d
- Page 149 and 150: 6.3. DECOMPOSITION 121 10 5 5 5 20
- Page 151 and 152: 6.4. DECAY OF COEFFICIENTS 123 10 2
- Page 153 and 154: 6.5. COMPARISON WITH MATCHING PURSU
- Page 155 and 156: 6.6. SUMMARY OF COMPUTATIONAL EXPER
- Page 157 and 158: Chapter 7 Future Work In the future
- Page 159 and 160: 7.2. MODIFYING EDGELET DICTIONARY 1
- Page 161 and 162: 7.3. ACCELERATING THE ITERATIVE ALG
- Page 163 and 164: Appendix A Direct Edgelet Transform
- Page 165: A.2. EXAMPLES 137 edgelet transform
- Page 169 and 170: A.3. DETAILS 141 (a) Lenna image (b
- Page 171 and 172: A.3. DETAILS 143 Ordering of Dyadic
- Page 173 and 174: A.3. DETAILS 145 (1,K +1), (1,K +2)
- Page 175 and 176: A.3. DETAILS 147 x 1 , y 1 x 2 , y
- Page 177 and 178: Appendix B Fast Edgelet-like Transf
- Page 179 and 180: B.1. TRANSFORMS FOR 2-D CONTINUOUS
- Page 181 and 182: B.2. DISCRETE ALGORITHM 153 B.2.1 S
- Page 183 and 184: B.2. DISCRETE ALGORITHM 155 extensi
- Page 185 and 186: B.2. DISCRETE ALGORITHM 157 For the
- Page 187 and 188: B.3. ADJOINT OF THE FAST TRANSFORM
- Page 189 and 190: B.4. ANALYSIS 161 above matrix, whi
- Page 191 and 192: B.5. EXAMPLES 163 B.5 Examples B.5.
- Page 193 and 194: B.5. EXAMPLES 165 And so on. Note f
- Page 195 and 196: B.6. MISCELLANEOUS 167 It takes abo
- Page 197 and 198: B.6. MISCELLANEOUS 169 The function
- Page 199 and 200: Bibliography [1] Sensor Data Manage
- Page 201 and 202: BIBLIOGRAPHY 173 [24] C. Victor Che
- Page 203 and 204: BIBLIOGRAPHY 175 [50] David L. Dono
- Page 205 and 206: BIBLIOGRAPHY 177 [75] Vivek K. Goya
- Page 207 and 208: BIBLIOGRAPHY 179 [100] Stéphane Ma
- Page 209 and 210: BIBLIOGRAPHY 181 [127] C. E. Shanno
A.3. DETAILS 139<br />
(a) Stick <strong>image</strong><br />
(b) Filtered stick <strong>image</strong><br />
(c) Edgelet trans. coeff.(largest−10000/362496)<br />
5<br />
20<br />
20<br />
4<br />
40<br />
60<br />
40<br />
60<br />
3<br />
80<br />
80<br />
2<br />
100<br />
120<br />
20 40 60 80 100 120<br />
100<br />
120<br />
20 40 60 80 100 120<br />
1<br />
0<br />
0 5000 10000<br />
(d) Edgelets assoc. with largest−100 coeff.<br />
(e) Largest−300 coeff.<br />
(f) Largest−500 coeff.<br />
20<br />
20<br />
20<br />
40<br />
40<br />
40<br />
60<br />
60<br />
60<br />
80<br />
80<br />
80<br />
100<br />
100<br />
100<br />
120<br />
20 40 60 80 100 120<br />
120<br />
20 40 60 80 100 120<br />
120<br />
20 40 60 80 100 120<br />
Figure A.2: Edgelet transform of the sticky <strong>image</strong>: (a) is the original; (b) is the filtered<br />
<strong>image</strong>; (c) is the sorted coefficients; (d), (e) and (f) are the reconstructions based on the<br />
largest 100, 300 and 500 coefficients, respectively.<br />
explains how to compute a single edgelet coefficient. Section A.3.5 shows how to do the<br />
adjoint transform.<br />
A.3.1<br />
Definition<br />
In this subsection, we define what a direct edgelet transform is.<br />
For continuous functions, the edgelet transform is defined in [50]. But in modern computing<br />
practice, an <strong>image</strong> is digitalized: it is a discrete function, or a matrix. There are<br />
many possibilities to realize the edgelet transform for a matrix, due to many ways to interpolate<br />
a matrix as a continuous 2-D function.<br />
We explain a way of interpolation. Suppose the <strong>image</strong> is a squared <strong>image</strong> having N<br />
rows and N columns. The total number of pixels is N 2 . We assume N is a power of<br />
2, N =2 n . Let the matrix I = I(i, j) 1≤i,j≤N ∈ R N×N correspond to the digital <strong>image</strong>,