sparse image representation via combined transforms - Convex ...
sparse image representation via combined transforms - Convex ...
sparse image representation via combined transforms - Convex ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
4.3. MINIMUM l 1 NORM SOLUTION 85<br />
l 0 norm is a nonconvex function while l 1 norm is convex.<br />
Some inspiring applications of the minimum l 1 norm phenomenon are given in [55]:<br />
• Recovering missing segments of a bandlimited signal. Suppose s is a bandlimited<br />
signal with frequency components limited in B. Buts is missing in a time interval T .<br />
Given B, if|T | is small enough, then the minimizer of ‖s − s ′ ‖ 1 among all s ′ whose<br />
frequency components are limited in B is exactly s.<br />
• Recovery of a “<strong>sparse</strong>” wide-band signal from narrow-band measurements. Suppose s<br />
is a signal that is “<strong>sparse</strong>” in the time domain. As we know, a time-<strong>sparse</strong> signal must<br />
occupy a wide band in the frequency domain. Suppose N t ≥|s|. Suppose we can only<br />
observe a bandlimited fraction of s, r = P B s, here P B functioning like a bandpass<br />
filter. We can perfectly recover s by finding the minimizer of ‖r−P B s ′ ‖ 1 among all the<br />
s ′ satisfying |s ′ |≤N t . This phenomenon has application in several branches of applied<br />
science, where instrumental limitations make the available observation bandlimited.<br />
On the other hand, if we consider the symmetry between the time domain and the<br />
frequency domain, this is a dual of the previous case. We simply switch the positions<br />
of the time domain and the frequency domain.<br />
Another recent advance in theory [43] has given an interesting result. Suppose that the<br />
overcomplete dictionary we consider is a combination of two complementary orthonormal<br />
bases. By “complementary” we mean that the maximum absolute value of the inner product<br />
of any two elements (one from each basis) is upper bounded by a small value. Suppose the<br />
observed signal y is made by a small number of atoms in the dictionary. Solving the<br />
minimum l 1 norm problem will give us the same solution as solving the minimum l 0 norm<br />
problem. More specifically, if a dictionary is made by two bases—Dirac basis and Fourier<br />
basis—and if the observation y is made by fewer than √ N/2 atoms from the dictionary,<br />
where N is the size of the signal, then the minimum l 1 norm decomposition is the same as<br />
the minimum l 0 norm decomposition.<br />
‖x‖ 0 denotes the number of nonzero elements in the vector x. Thel 0 norm is generally<br />
regarded as the measure of sparsity. So the minimum l 0 norm decomposition is generally<br />
regarded as the <strong>sparse</strong>st decomposition. Note the minimum l 0 norm problem is a combinatorial<br />
problem and in general is NP hard. But the minimum l 1 norm problem is a convex<br />
optimization problem and can be solved by some polynomial-time optimization methods,