Economic Models - Convex Optimization
Economic Models - Convex Optimization
Economic Models - Convex Optimization
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
76 Andrew Hughes Hallet<br />
with a horizon of up to five years — vs a maximum of two years in<br />
the inflation targeting rules operated by the Bank of England. Moreover,<br />
these spending limits are constraints defined in nominal terms, so<br />
that they will be met. In addition, the Treasury operates a tax smoothing<br />
approach — having rejected “formulaic rules” that might have<br />
adjusted taxes or expenditures, or the various tax regulators, or credit<br />
taxes that could have stabilized the economy in the short term. The<br />
bulk of fiscal policy will remain focused on the medium to long term<br />
therefore.<br />
To summarize, the institutional structure itself has introduced fiscal<br />
leadership. And, since the discretionary elements are smaller than elsewhere<br />
— smaller than the automatic stabilizers (Tables 1–5) and declining<br />
(Box 5.3) — something else (monetary policy) must have taken up the burden<br />
of short-run stabilization. This arrangement is, therefore, best modeled<br />
as a Stackelberg game, with institutional parameters for goals, independence,<br />
priorities etc. I shall argue that this has had the very desirable result<br />
of increasing the degree of co-ordination between policy makers without<br />
compromising their formal or institutional independence — or indeed, their<br />
credibility for delivering stability and low inflation. Constrained independence,<br />
in other words, designed to reduce the externalities, which each party<br />
might, otherwise, impose on the other.<br />
4. Empirical Evidence<br />
The next step is to establish whether the UK authorities have followed<br />
the leadership model described above. The fact that they say that they<br />
follow such a strategy does not prove that they do so. The difficulty<br />
here is that, although the asymmetry in ex-ante (anticipated) responses<br />
between the follower and leader is clear enough in the theoretical model —<br />
the follower expects no further changes from the leader after the follower<br />
chooses his reaction function, whereas the leader takes this reaction<br />
function into account — such an asymmetry and zero restriction<br />
will not appear in the ex-post (observed) responses that emerge in the<br />
final solution (Basar and Olsder, 1999; Brandsma and Hughes Hallett,<br />
1984; Hughes Hallett, 1984). Since I have no data on anticipations, this<br />
makes it difficult to test for leadership directly. But, we can use indirect<br />
tests based on the degree of competition, or complimentarity, between the<br />
instruments.