10.03.2015 Views

Economic Models - Convex Optimization

Economic Models - Convex Optimization

Economic Models - Convex Optimization

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

76 Andrew Hughes Hallet<br />

with a horizon of up to five years — vs a maximum of two years in<br />

the inflation targeting rules operated by the Bank of England. Moreover,<br />

these spending limits are constraints defined in nominal terms, so<br />

that they will be met. In addition, the Treasury operates a tax smoothing<br />

approach — having rejected “formulaic rules” that might have<br />

adjusted taxes or expenditures, or the various tax regulators, or credit<br />

taxes that could have stabilized the economy in the short term. The<br />

bulk of fiscal policy will remain focused on the medium to long term<br />

therefore.<br />

To summarize, the institutional structure itself has introduced fiscal<br />

leadership. And, since the discretionary elements are smaller than elsewhere<br />

— smaller than the automatic stabilizers (Tables 1–5) and declining<br />

(Box 5.3) — something else (monetary policy) must have taken up the burden<br />

of short-run stabilization. This arrangement is, therefore, best modeled<br />

as a Stackelberg game, with institutional parameters for goals, independence,<br />

priorities etc. I shall argue that this has had the very desirable result<br />

of increasing the degree of co-ordination between policy makers without<br />

compromising their formal or institutional independence — or indeed, their<br />

credibility for delivering stability and low inflation. Constrained independence,<br />

in other words, designed to reduce the externalities, which each party<br />

might, otherwise, impose on the other.<br />

4. Empirical Evidence<br />

The next step is to establish whether the UK authorities have followed<br />

the leadership model described above. The fact that they say that they<br />

follow such a strategy does not prove that they do so. The difficulty<br />

here is that, although the asymmetry in ex-ante (anticipated) responses<br />

between the follower and leader is clear enough in the theoretical model —<br />

the follower expects no further changes from the leader after the follower<br />

chooses his reaction function, whereas the leader takes this reaction<br />

function into account — such an asymmetry and zero restriction<br />

will not appear in the ex-post (observed) responses that emerge in the<br />

final solution (Basar and Olsder, 1999; Brandsma and Hughes Hallett,<br />

1984; Hughes Hallett, 1984). Since I have no data on anticipations, this<br />

makes it difficult to test for leadership directly. But, we can use indirect<br />

tests based on the degree of competition, or complimentarity, between the<br />

instruments.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!