Economic Models - Convex Optimization
Economic Models - Convex Optimization Economic Models - Convex Optimization
A Novel Method of Estimation Under Co-Integration 31 It is obvious from these findings, the super consistency of the OLS. However, the method we introduce here, produces almost minimum variance errors, which is a quite desirable property, as suggested by Engle and Granger (Dickey et al., 1994, p. 27). Hence, we will mainly focus on this property in our next section. 6. Case Study 2: Further Evidence Regarding the Minimum Variance Property With the same set of data, the co-integration vector without an intercept obtained by applying the ML method is: 1 − 0.9422994 − 0.058564 The errors corresponding to this vector are obtained from: û i = C i − 0.9422994I i − 0.058564W i (18) Again these errors will be denoted by uml i . Next, we apply SVD to in Eq. (12) to obtain matrix C, which is: ⎡ ⎤ 1 −0.9192042 −0.066081211 ⎢ ⎥ C = ⎣ 1 1.160720 −1.012970 ⎦ 1 0.9395341 2.063768 and ⎛ ⎞ 1.359891 ⎜ ⎟ Euclidean norm = ⎝ 1.836676 ⎠ 2.47828 The singular values of are: f 1 = 0.89514, f 2 = 0.0403121 and f 3 = 0.0026218249 Again, all f i ’s are less than 1. We consider the first row of C, so that the errors corresponding to this vector are obtained from: û i = C i − 0.9192042I i − 0.066081211W i (19) These errors will be also denoted by usvd i . The co-integrating vector reported by the authors (p. 109), which is obtained from the VAR(2), including the dummies mentioned previously,
32 Alexis Lazaridis by applying the ML procedure is given by: 1 − 0.93638 − 0.03804 and the errors obtained from this vector are computed from: û i = C i − 0.93638I i − 0.03804W i (20) As in the previous case, these errors will be denoted by ubook i . The minimum variance property can be seen from the following: Standard deviation of Standard deviation of Standard deviation of {uml i } {usvd i } {book i } 0.0169 0.0166 0.0193 Next, we consider the model presented by Banerjee et al. (1993, pp. 292–293) that refers to VAR(2) with constant dummy and trend. The state vector x ∈ E 4 consists of the variables (m − p), p, y, and R. The data (in logs) are presented in Harris (1995, statistical appendix, pp. 153– 155. Note that the entries for 1967:1 and 1973:2 have to be corrected from 0.076195 and 0.56569498 to 9.076195 and 9.56569498, respectively). Considering the co-integration vector reported by the authors, which has been obtained by applying the ML method, we compute the errors from: û i = (m − p) i + 6.3966p i − 0.8938y i + 7.6838R i . (21) These errors will be denoted by uml i . Estimating the same VAR by OLS, we get, ⎡ ⎤ −0.089584 0.16375 −0.184282 −0.933878 −0.012116 −0.9605 0.229635 0.206963 = ⎢ ⎥ ⎣ 0.021703 0.676612 −0.476152 0.447157 ⎦ , −0.006877 0.118891 0.048932 −0.076414 ⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤ 3.129631 0.001867 −2.46328 δ = ⎢ ⎥ ⎣ 5.181506 ⎦ and µ = −0.001442 ⎢ ⎥ ⎣ 0.003078 ⎦ −0.470803 −0.000366
- Page 4 and 5: ECONOMIC MODELS Methods, Theory and
- Page 6 and 7: This Volume is Dedicated to the Mem
- Page 8 and 9: Contents Tom Oskar Martin Kronsjo:
- Page 10 and 11: Tom Oskar Martin Kronsjo: A Profile
- Page 12 and 13: Tom Oskar Martin Kronsjo students t
- Page 14 and 15: About the Editor Prof. Dipak Basu i
- Page 16 and 17: Contributors Athanasios Athanasenas
- Page 18: Contributors Victoria Miroshnik, is
- Page 21 and 22: xx Introduction type of model is ve
- Page 23 and 24: This page intentionally left blank
- Page 25 and 26: This page intentionally left blank
- Page 27 and 28: 4 Olav Bjerkholt Among these was al
- Page 29 and 30: 6 Olav Bjerkholt method, searching
- Page 31 and 32: 8 Olav Bjerkholt context, but one o
- Page 33 and 34: 10 Olav Bjerkholt be modified in th
- Page 35 and 36: 12 Olav Bjerkholt through a number
- Page 37 and 38: 14 Olav Bjerkholt memoranda. These
- Page 39 and 40: 16 Olav Bjerkholt hopelessly ineffe
- Page 41 and 42: 18 Olav Bjerkholt References Arrow,
- Page 43 and 44: This page intentionally left blank
- Page 45 and 46: This page intentionally left blank
- Page 47 and 48: 24 Alexis Lazaridis A straightforwa
- Page 49 and 50: 26 Alexis Lazaridis where ⎛ ⎞ j
- Page 51 and 52: 28 Alexis Lazaridis Estimating the
- Page 53: 30 Alexis Lazaridis 5.1. Testing fo
- Page 57 and 58: 34 Alexis Lazaridis Nevertheless, t
- Page 59 and 60: 36 Alexis Lazaridis Table 2. Residu
- Page 61 and 62: 38 Alexis Lazaridis Table 3. Critic
- Page 63 and 64: 40 Alexis Lazaridis Figure 4. The s
- Page 65 and 66: 42 Alexis Lazaridis Perron, P and T
- Page 67 and 68: 44 Dipak R. Basu and Alexis Lazarid
- Page 69 and 70: 46 Dipak R. Basu and Alexis Lazarid
- Page 71 and 72: 48 Dipak R. Basu and Alexis Lazarid
- Page 73 and 74: 50 Dipak R. Basu and Alexis Lazarid
- Page 75 and 76: 52 Dipak R. Basu and Alexis Lazarid
- Page 77 and 78: 54 Dipak R. Basu and Alexis Lazarid
- Page 79 and 80: 56 Dipak R. Basu and Alexis Lazarid
- Page 81 and 82: 58 Dipak R. Basu and Alexis Lazarid
- Page 83 and 84: 60 Dipak R. Basu and Alexis Lazarid
- Page 85 and 86: 62 Dipak R. Basu and Alexis Lazarid
- Page 87 and 88: 64 Dipak R. Basu and Alexis Lazarid
- Page 89 and 90: 66 Dipak R. Basu and Alexis Lazarid
- Page 91 and 92: This page intentionally left blank
- Page 93 and 94: 70 Andrew Hughes Hallet have, there
- Page 95 and 96: 72 Andrew Hughes Hallet other. The
- Page 97 and 98: 74 Andrew Hughes Hallet success in
- Page 99 and 100: 76 Andrew Hughes Hallet with a hori
- Page 101 and 102: 78 Andrew Hughes Hallet control inf
- Page 103 and 104: 80 Andrew Hughes Hallet Table 2. Fi
32 Alexis Lazaridis<br />
by applying the ML procedure is given by:<br />
1 − 0.93638 − 0.03804<br />
and the errors obtained from this vector are computed from:<br />
û i = C i − 0.93638I i − 0.03804W i (20)<br />
As in the previous case, these errors will be denoted by ubook i .<br />
The minimum variance property can be seen from the following:<br />
Standard deviation of Standard deviation of Standard deviation of<br />
{uml i } {usvd i } {book i }<br />
0.0169 0.0166 0.0193<br />
Next, we consider the model presented by Banerjee et al. (1993,<br />
pp. 292–293) that refers to VAR(2) with constant dummy and trend. The<br />
state vector x ∈ E 4 consists of the variables (m − p), p, y, and R. The<br />
data (in logs) are presented in Harris (1995, statistical appendix, pp. 153–<br />
155. Note that the entries for 1967:1 and 1973:2 have to be corrected from<br />
0.076195 and 0.56569498 to 9.076195 and 9.56569498, respectively). Considering<br />
the co-integration vector reported by the authors, which has been<br />
obtained by applying the ML method, we compute the errors from:<br />
û i = (m − p) i + 6.3966p i − 0.8938y i + 7.6838R i . (21)<br />
These errors will be denoted by uml i .<br />
Estimating the same VAR by OLS, we get,<br />
⎡<br />
⎤<br />
−0.089584 0.16375 −0.184282 −0.933878<br />
−0.012116 −0.9605 0.229635 0.206963<br />
= ⎢<br />
⎥<br />
⎣ 0.021703 0.676612 −0.476152 0.447157 ⎦ ,<br />
−0.006877 0.118891 0.048932 −0.076414<br />
⎡ ⎤<br />
⎡ ⎤<br />
3.129631<br />
0.001867<br />
−2.46328<br />
δ = ⎢ ⎥<br />
⎣ 5.181506 ⎦ and µ =<br />
−0.001442<br />
⎢ ⎥<br />
⎣ 0.003078 ⎦<br />
−0.470803<br />
−0.000366