Economic Models - Convex Optimization
Economic Models - Convex Optimization Economic Models - Convex Optimization
Credit and Income 217 Y i = Y i + Y i−1 W i = W i + W i−1 u i = Y i − 0.289613W i − 0.0036218t i . (19) It may be useful to note that there are three identities in the system and the only exogenous variable present in the system is the trend. We may obtain dynamic simulation results from the ECVAR specified in Eq. (19), in order to obtain predictions for Y i and W i and at the same time to verify the validity of the co-integration vector used. This can be achieved by first formulating the following deterministic system. K 0 y i = K 1 y i−1 + K 2 y i−2 + K 3 y i−3 + ˜Dq i (20) where y i = [ϒ i W i u i Y i W i ] ′ , q i = [t i 1] ′ ⎡ K 0 = ⎢ ⎣ 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 −1 0.289613 −1 0 0 1 0 0 −1 0 0 1 ⎤ ⎥ ⎦ , ⎡ ⎤ 0.2618 0.0273 −0.0879 0 0 0.0977 0.4864 −0.03852 0 0 K 1 = ⎢ 0 0 0 0 0 ⎥ ⎣ 0 0 0 1 0⎦ , 0 0 0 0 1 ⎡ ⎤ 0.161 0.0487 0 0 0 0.2256 0.0123 0 0 0 K 2 = ⎢ 0 0 0 0 0 ⎥ ⎣ 0 0 0 0 0⎦ , 0 0 0 0 0 ⎡ ⎤ −0.00432 0.076 0 0 0 0.199 −0.068 0 0 0 K 3 = ⎢ 0 0 0 0 0 ⎥ ⎣ 0 0 0 0 0⎦ , 0 0 0 0 0
218 Athanasios Athanasenas and ⎡ ˜D = ⎢ ⎣ ⎤ 0 0.5132 0 0.2241 ⎥ ⎦ . −0.003621 0 0 0 0 0 Pre-multiplying Eq. (20) by K0 −1 we get: y i = Q 1 y i−1 + Q 2 y i−2 + Q 3 y i−3 + Dq i (21) where Q 1 = K0 −1 K 1, Q 2 = K0 −1 K 2, Q 3 = K0 −1 K 3, and D = K0 −1 ˜D. The system given in Eq. (21) can be transformed to an equivalent firstorder dynamic system, in a similar way to the one already described earlier [see Eqs. (8) and (8a)]. It is noted that in this case matrix à is of dimension (15 × 15). It is important to mention again that we should avoid using a dynamic system, for simulation purposes, that is unstable. Thus, from this system, we can obtain dynamic simulation results for the variables Y i and W i . These results are graphically presented (Fig. 2). The very low value of Theil’s inequality coefficient U, for both cases is a pronounced evidence that, apart from computing the indicated cointegration vector, we have also formulated the suitable ECVAR so that the results obtained are undoubtfully robust. 5. Conclusions and Implications The purpose of this study is to contribute to the empirical investigation of the co-integration dynamics of the credit-income nexus, within the economic growth process of the post-war US economy, over the period from 1957 to 2007. Utilizing advanced and contemporary co-integration analysis and applying vector ECM estimation, we place special emphasis on forecasting and system stability analysis. I can say that to the best of my knowledge, similar system stability and forecasting analysis, as the one applied here, is very difficult to meet in the relevant literature, after taking into consideration similar research works. See for example, (Arestis and Demetriades, 1997; Arestis et al., 2001; Demetriades and Hussein, 1996; Friedman and Kuttner, 1992; 1993; Levine and Zervos, 1998; Rousseau and Wachtel, 1998; 2000). My results state clearly that there is no short-run causality effect from credit changes to income changes, but only in the levels, that is in the long
- Page 189 and 190: 166 Anna-Maria Mouza increase for e
- Page 191 and 192: 168 Anna-Maria Mouza The solution o
- Page 193 and 194: This page intentionally left blank
- Page 195 and 196: This page intentionally left blank
- Page 197 and 198: 174 Fabrizio Iacone and Renzo Orsi
- Page 199 and 200: 176 Fabrizio Iacone and Renzo Orsi
- Page 201 and 202: 178 Fabrizio Iacone and Renzo Orsi
- Page 203 and 204: 180 Fabrizio Iacone and Renzo Orsi
- Page 205 and 206: 182 Fabrizio Iacone and Renzo Orsi
- Page 207 and 208: 184 Fabrizio Iacone and Renzo Orsi
- Page 209 and 210: 186 Fabrizio Iacone and Renzo Orsi
- Page 211 and 212: 188 Fabrizio Iacone and Renzo Orsi
- Page 213 and 214: 190 Fabrizio Iacone and Renzo Orsi
- Page 215 and 216: 192 Fabrizio Iacone and Renzo Orsi
- Page 217 and 218: 194 Fabrizio Iacone and Renzo Orsi
- Page 219 and 220: 196 Fabrizio Iacone and Renzo Orsi
- Page 221 and 222: 198 Fabrizio Iacone and Renzo Orsi
- Page 223 and 224: 200 Fabrizio Iacone and Renzo Orsi
- Page 225 and 226: 202 Athanasios Athanasenas 2. The C
- Page 227 and 228: 204 Athanasios Athanasenas to asset
- Page 229 and 230: 206 Athanasios Athanasenas I end up
- Page 231 and 232: 208 Athanasios Athanasenas consider
- Page 233 and 234: 210 Athanasios Athanasenas Table 1.
- Page 235 and 236: 212 Athanasios Athanasenas vector:
- Page 237 and 238: 214 Athanasios Athanasenas in relev
- Page 239: 216 Athanasios Athanasenas The esti
- Page 243 and 244: 220 Athanasios Athanasenas run, cre
- Page 245 and 246: 222 Athanasios Athanasenas Lown, C
- Page 247 and 248: 224 Index fiscal expansions, 91, 92
218 Athanasios Athanasenas<br />
and<br />
⎡<br />
˜D =<br />
⎢<br />
⎣<br />
⎤<br />
0 0.5132<br />
0 0.2241<br />
⎥<br />
⎦ .<br />
−0.003621 0<br />
0 0<br />
0 0<br />
Pre-multiplying Eq. (20) by K0 −1 we get:<br />
y i = Q 1 y i−1 + Q 2 y i−2 + Q 3 y i−3 + Dq i (21)<br />
where Q 1 = K0 −1 K 1, Q 2 = K0 −1 K 2, Q 3 = K0 −1 K 3, and D = K0<br />
−1 ˜D.<br />
The system given in Eq. (21) can be transformed to an equivalent firstorder<br />
dynamic system, in a similar way to the one already described earlier<br />
[see Eqs. (8) and (8a)]. It is noted that in this case matrix à is of dimension<br />
(15 × 15). It is important to mention again that we should avoid using<br />
a dynamic system, for simulation purposes, that is unstable. Thus, from<br />
this system, we can obtain dynamic simulation results for the variables Y i<br />
and W i . These results are graphically presented (Fig. 2).<br />
The very low value of Theil’s inequality coefficient U, for both cases<br />
is a pronounced evidence that, apart from computing the indicated cointegration<br />
vector, we have also formulated the suitable ECVAR so that the<br />
results obtained are undoubtfully robust.<br />
5. Conclusions and Implications<br />
The purpose of this study is to contribute to the empirical investigation of<br />
the co-integration dynamics of the credit-income nexus, within the economic<br />
growth process of the post-war US economy, over the period from<br />
1957 to 2007.<br />
Utilizing advanced and contemporary co-integration analysis and<br />
applying vector ECM estimation, we place special emphasis on forecasting<br />
and system stability analysis. I can say that to the best of my knowledge,<br />
similar system stability and forecasting analysis, as the one applied here,<br />
is very difficult to meet in the relevant literature, after taking into consideration<br />
similar research works. See for example, (Arestis and Demetriades,<br />
1997; Arestis et al., 2001; Demetriades and Hussein, 1996; Friedman and<br />
Kuttner, 1992; 1993; Levine and Zervos, 1998; Rousseau and Wachtel,<br />
1998; 2000).<br />
My results state clearly that there is no short-run causality effect from<br />
credit changes to income changes, but only in the levels, that is in the long