10.03.2015 Views

Economic Models - Convex Optimization

Economic Models - Convex Optimization

Economic Models - Convex Optimization

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

214 Athanasios Athanasenas<br />

in relevant works, the stability analysis applied for the system presented<br />

in Eq. (8).<br />

4.5. The ECM Formulation<br />

The lagged values of the disequilibrium errors, that is u i−1 , serve as an<br />

error correction mechanism in a short-run dynamic relationship, where the<br />

additional explanatory variables may appear in lagged first differences. All<br />

variables in this equation, also known as ECM, are stationary so that, from<br />

the econometric point of view, it is a standard single equation model, where<br />

all the classical tests are applicable. It should be noted, that the lag structure<br />

and the details of the ECM, should be in line with the formulation as seen<br />

in Eq. (6a). Hence, I started from this relation considering the errors u i<br />

and estimated the following model, given that the maximum lag length is<br />

p − 1 i.e., 3.<br />

Y i = α 0 +<br />

3∑<br />

α j Y i−j +<br />

j=1<br />

3∑<br />

β j W i−j − a Y u i−1 + Y v i . (15)<br />

j=1<br />

Note that Y v i are the model disturbances. If the adjustment coefficient<br />

a Y is significant, then we may conclude that in the long run, W causes Y.<br />

If a Y = 0, then no such a causality effect exists. In case that all β j are<br />

significant, then there is a causality effect in the short run, from W to<br />

Y. Ifallβ j = 0, then no such causality effect exists. The estimation<br />

results are presented below.<br />

Y i = 0.5132+ 0.2618Y i−1 + 0.161Y i−2 − 0.00432Y i−3 + 0.0273W i−1<br />

(0.125) (0.074) (0.073) (0.0738) (0.075)<br />

p value 0.0001 0.0005 0.0276 0.953 0.719<br />

Hansen 0.0370 0.1380 0.2380 0.234 0.128<br />

+ 0.0487W i−2 − 0.076W i−3 − 0.0879u i−1 + Y ˆv i<br />

(0.075) (0.065) (0.022)<br />

p value 0.519 0.242 0.0001<br />

Hansen 0.065 0.098 0.025 (for all coefficients 2.316) (16)<br />

¯R 2 = 0.167,s= 0.009, DWd = 1.98,F (7,189) = 6.65,<br />

Condition number (CN) = 635.34.<br />

(p value = 0.0)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!