10.03.2015 Views

Economic Models - Convex Optimization

Economic Models - Convex Optimization

Economic Models - Convex Optimization

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Inflation Control in Central and Eastern European Countries 175<br />

because of a natural price rigidity with respect to negative corrections, the<br />

re-alignment of relative prices took the form of a sudden increase and a steep<br />

inflation followed: by opening to the international trade (and by introducing<br />

the proper legislation, in order to force the local producers to face a harder<br />

budget constraint), the countries in transition had a chance to import a price<br />

structure similar to the one of their commercial partners. In fact, being the<br />

exchange rate fixed, the domestic producers could not raise their prices too<br />

much without losing competitiveness with respect to the foreign ones.<br />

Slovenia followed a different approach to disinflation, targeting the<br />

growth of a relatively narrow monetary aggregate (M1); according to Capriolo<br />

and Lavrac (2003), anyway the key characteristic of the period was the<br />

continuous intervention on the foreign exchange market in order to prevent<br />

an excessive real rate appreciation (contrary to the strategy of the Bundesbank<br />

and of the Eurosystem, the control of M1 was also enforced with nonmarket<br />

instruments and procedures). Since mainstream optimal currency<br />

area literature prescribes a greater incentive to adopt a stable exchange rate<br />

to the countries more open to the international trade, the fact that the outcome<br />

is actually reversed means that price stabilization rather than trade<br />

was the priority in the exchange rate commitment served in Poland and in<br />

Czechoslovakia.<br />

Fixing the exchange rate may have contributed to price stabilization,<br />

and inflation actually dropped very quickly, but there are certain differences<br />

remained with respect to the EU, leading to a strong real exchange rate<br />

appreciation. This may have been partially due to the Balassa-Samuelson<br />

effect: assuming that the marginal productivity and the wage in the sector<br />

of internationally traded goods, is set on the foreign market and that the<br />

same wage is transferred to the production of the non-traded goods, then<br />

the productivity gap between the two sectors is compensated by a price<br />

increase in the less productive domestic sector. This yields a progressive<br />

appreciation of the real exchange rate and higher domestic inflation.<br />

The faster growth of productivity, determined by the transfer of<br />

technology from the international trade partners and the more efficient allocation<br />

of the resources within the economies, compensated part of the pressure<br />

on the domestic producers, but the fixed exchange rate arrangements<br />

were not sustainable for a long time: Poland switched to a regime of preannounced<br />

crawling peg as early as 1991, later coupling it with an oscillation<br />

band which was gradually widened until it was finally abandoned in 2000;<br />

Czech Republic resorted to a free float without explicit commitment as<br />

early as 1997 under the pressure of a speculative attack, its currency having<br />

progressively over-evaluated in real terms over time. Both the countries

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!