10.03.2015 Views

Economic Models - Convex Optimization

Economic Models - Convex Optimization

Economic Models - Convex Optimization

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

174 Fabrizio Iacone and Renzo Orsi<br />

developments: we think that because of these differences they are, together,<br />

representative of the whole group of CEECs. For the euro-area, we took<br />

Germany as the reference country.<br />

2. Inflation Control over 1989–2004<br />

2.1. Transition, Integration, and Accession<br />

Although Poland, Czech Republic, and Slovenia shared the goals of implementing<br />

a functioning market economy and of acceding to the EU, the<br />

policies they implemented to reach them were rather different.<br />

The first reason for the difference is in the productive structure at the<br />

beginning of the transition. Yugoslavia established a quasi-market system<br />

well before 1989, with quite independent firms and relatively hard budget<br />

constraints; production was much more centralized and budget constraints<br />

much softer in Poland and Czech Republic, and, to make things tougher for<br />

these two countries, they also had to suffer the break-up of the council for<br />

mutual economic assistance (CMEA), in which they were well integrated<br />

(Czech Republic also had to endure the additional trade disruption, caused<br />

by the separation from Slovakia). Poland and Czech Republic represent<br />

an average position with respect to the general condition of the productive<br />

structure of the CEECs at the beginning of the transition. Local differences<br />

remain: for example, Hungary implemented some timid reforms before<br />

1989, while the three Baltic countries experienced a much bigger shock,<br />

because the disintegration of the Soviet Union resulted in the loss of their<br />

largest trade partner. The stronger centralization, the softer budget constraint,<br />

and the higher disruption caused by the break. up of the CMEA,<br />

and of Czechoslovakia could have coeteris paribus caused a more turbulent<br />

and longer transition for Poland and Czech Republic, but in reality Slovenia<br />

had to face the major shock due to the collapse of Yugoslavia and of the<br />

subsequent wars, which deprived the country of its biggest market and had<br />

other adverse effects including the loss of revenues and hard currency due<br />

to the fall of tourism.<br />

A more precise ranking emerges when the size and the openness to<br />

international trade is considered, with Poland being the largest country and<br />

Slovenia the smallest one. As far as the monetary policies implemented for<br />

inflation stabilization, all the CEECs except Slovenia, began their transition<br />

with a strong commitment to a fixed exchange rate. The initial price<br />

liberalization, in fact, left the system without a nominal anchor, and, also

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!