Economic Models - Convex Optimization
Economic Models - Convex Optimization
Economic Models - Convex Optimization
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Toward a Theory of Japanese Organizational Culture 145<br />
MAV<br />
LC<br />
CP<br />
NC<br />
OC<br />
MEV<br />
MIV<br />
HRMPJ<br />
Where “NC” is “National Culture”; “OC” is “Organizational Culture”; “LC” is “Leader<br />
Culture”; “MAV” is “Macro-Values of Culture”; “MEV” is “Meso-Values of Culture”;<br />
“MIV” is “Micro-Values of Culture”; “HRMPJ” is “Human Resources Management<br />
Practices in Japan”, and “CP” is “Corporate Performance”.<br />
Figure 2.<br />
Value–culture–performance: a thematic presentation.<br />
and commitments, and (c) the contribution of the organization to the society.<br />
If we consider the contribution of the organization to society that is<br />
already taken into account by the customers’ satisfaction and employees’<br />
satisfaction, then CP has these two important contributory factors.<br />
Theoretical relationship between the observed variables and the underlying<br />
constructs are specified in an exploratory model, represented in Fig. 2.<br />
In Fig. 3, a more elaborate model, including the unique HRM system of the<br />
Japanese companies is described. Figure 3 represents a Linear Structural<br />
Relations (LISREL) version (Joreskog and Sorbom, 1999) of the model,<br />
which can be estimated using the methods of structural equation modeling<br />
(Raykov and Marcoulides, 2000).<br />
5. Discussion<br />
The proposed theory describes the relationship between NC and CPs<br />
through OC with the HRM system affecting the nature of the culture and<br />
leadership. These inter-relationships are important aspects of the Japanese<br />
corporate behaviors in a multinational setting and this proposed theory is<br />
an attempt to understand the Japanese corporate culture.<br />
Analysis of the Japanese culture and organizations by outsiders so far<br />
suffers from a number of defects (Ikeda, 1987; Watanabe, 1998). They neither<br />
try to understand the effects of the Japanese value system on their<br />
organizations nor do they give any importance to the relationship between