10.03.2015 Views

Economic Models - Convex Optimization

Economic Models - Convex Optimization

Economic Models - Convex Optimization

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

130 Nikitas Spiros Koutsoukis<br />

lower the level of authority the more operational or specific the actions<br />

that the constituents take in enterprise terms. At this level, constituents find<br />

it harder to consider a single-entity view of the organization, and hence<br />

organizational outcomes are less easily matched to personal interests.<br />

It follows that inconsistencies in the constituents’ perspectives have the<br />

ability to cancel out some of the main benefits that the other two facets bring<br />

forward, namely the unified view of the enterprise as single entity and the<br />

immediacy with which operational activities contribute to strategic goals.<br />

Inconsistencies in constituents’ perspectives are being addressed mainly<br />

through leadership and human resource practices, which aim to put in place<br />

an organizational culture, or otherwise a unified perception of what the<br />

enterprise stands for, its values and its practices among other things. Mission<br />

statements, codes of practice, and team building exercises are some of the<br />

most frequently used tools for scoping and setting out a unified, constituent<br />

view of the enterprise.<br />

Thus, a strong requirement is surfacing for developing new EI modeling<br />

frameworks, which are able to incorporate heterogeneous modeling constructs,<br />

such as the dimensions, entities or constituents considered above.<br />

We find that some of the key requirements are set out as follows:<br />

(a) Interchangeable dimensions: EI models should be able to shift between<br />

the dimensions considered above, without loss of context.<br />

(b) Use of hybrid modeling constructs: EI models should be able to utilize<br />

interchangeably modeling constructs for representing any type of enterprise<br />

activity unit, including procedural units, physical or logical units,<br />

inputs or outputs, tangible and intangible processes, decision-making<br />

points, etc.<br />

(c) Ability to consolidate or analyze to successive levels of detail: this is<br />

particularly useful for communicating enterprise structures throughout<br />

multiple echelons and hierarchy levels. For instance, stakeholders will<br />

most likely need access to a consolidated view of the integrated enterprise<br />

whereas employees are most likely to require a position-centred<br />

view of the enterprise, with detailed surroundings that are consolidated<br />

further away from the employee’s position.<br />

(d) Ability to interchange between declarative and goal-seeking states of<br />

the integration models: when in declarative mode, models work simply<br />

as formal structures, or simulators of how the integrated enterprise<br />

operates. In goal-seeking mode, the model emphasizes improvements<br />

that can lead to goal attainment or “satisfying,” to use Simon’s term<br />

(Simon, 1957).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!