Economic Models - Convex Optimization
Economic Models - Convex Optimization
Economic Models - Convex Optimization
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
130 Nikitas Spiros Koutsoukis<br />
lower the level of authority the more operational or specific the actions<br />
that the constituents take in enterprise terms. At this level, constituents find<br />
it harder to consider a single-entity view of the organization, and hence<br />
organizational outcomes are less easily matched to personal interests.<br />
It follows that inconsistencies in the constituents’ perspectives have the<br />
ability to cancel out some of the main benefits that the other two facets bring<br />
forward, namely the unified view of the enterprise as single entity and the<br />
immediacy with which operational activities contribute to strategic goals.<br />
Inconsistencies in constituents’ perspectives are being addressed mainly<br />
through leadership and human resource practices, which aim to put in place<br />
an organizational culture, or otherwise a unified perception of what the<br />
enterprise stands for, its values and its practices among other things. Mission<br />
statements, codes of practice, and team building exercises are some of the<br />
most frequently used tools for scoping and setting out a unified, constituent<br />
view of the enterprise.<br />
Thus, a strong requirement is surfacing for developing new EI modeling<br />
frameworks, which are able to incorporate heterogeneous modeling constructs,<br />
such as the dimensions, entities or constituents considered above.<br />
We find that some of the key requirements are set out as follows:<br />
(a) Interchangeable dimensions: EI models should be able to shift between<br />
the dimensions considered above, without loss of context.<br />
(b) Use of hybrid modeling constructs: EI models should be able to utilize<br />
interchangeably modeling constructs for representing any type of enterprise<br />
activity unit, including procedural units, physical or logical units,<br />
inputs or outputs, tangible and intangible processes, decision-making<br />
points, etc.<br />
(c) Ability to consolidate or analyze to successive levels of detail: this is<br />
particularly useful for communicating enterprise structures throughout<br />
multiple echelons and hierarchy levels. For instance, stakeholders will<br />
most likely need access to a consolidated view of the integrated enterprise<br />
whereas employees are most likely to require a position-centred<br />
view of the enterprise, with detailed surroundings that are consolidated<br />
further away from the employee’s position.<br />
(d) Ability to interchange between declarative and goal-seeking states of<br />
the integration models: when in declarative mode, models work simply<br />
as formal structures, or simulators of how the integrated enterprise<br />
operates. In goal-seeking mode, the model emphasizes improvements<br />
that can lead to goal attainment or “satisfying,” to use Simon’s term<br />
(Simon, 1957).