Economic Models - Convex Optimization

Economic Models - Convex Optimization Economic Models - Convex Optimization

convexoptimization.com
from convexoptimization.com More from this publisher
10.03.2015 Views

Cheap-talk Multiple Equilibria and Pareto 105 period. Rather than expenditures in emission-reducing capital, γ can therefore be interpreted as the additional costs resulting of a temporary switch to a cleaner resource — for e.g., of a switch from coal to natural gas. The firms attempts to maximize their profit. As we shall see at a later place, one can assume without loss of generality that they disregard the future and maximize in every τ, their current instantaneous profit. However, the actual tax rate t enters their instantaneous profit function and is unknown at the time when they choose v. Thus, they need to base their optimal choice of v on an expectation (or, prediction) t e of t. In reality, a firm can invest larger or smaller amounts of money in order to make or less accurate predictions of the tax, the government will actually implement. In this model, we assume for simplicity that each firm has two (extreme) options for predicting the implemented tax. It can either suppose that R’s announcement is truthful, that is, that t will be equal to t a , or it can do costly research and try to better predict the t that will actually be implemented. Depending upon the expectation-formation mechanism the firm chooses, we speak of believer B or of a non-believer NB: A believer considers the regulator’s announcement to be truthful and sets t e = t a (3) This does not cost anything. A non-believer makes a “rational” prediction of t, considering the current number of Bs and NBs as constant. Making the prediction in any given period τ costs δ>0. Details on the derivation of the NBs’prediction will be given later. Note that a firm can change its choice of expectation-formation mechanism at any moment in time. That is, a B can become a NB, and vice versa. We denote with π = π(t) ∈ [0, 1] the current fraction of Bs in the population. Thus, 1 − π is the current fraction of NBs. 2.2. The Regulator, R The regulator’s goal is to maximize with respect to t a ≥ 0 and t ≥ 0, the inter-temporal social welfare function. (t a ,t)= ∫ ∞ 0 e −ρτ ϕ(t a ,t)dτ

106 Chirstophe Deissenberg and Pavel Ševčík with ϕ(t a ,t)= (πx B + (1 − π)x NB ) + πg B + (1 − π)g NB − (π(x B − v B ) + (1 − π)(x NB − v NB )) 2 + t(π(x B − v B ) + (1 − π)(x NB − v NB )), (4) where x B ,x NB ,v B ,v NB denote the production respectively, investment chosen by the believers B and the non-believers NB, and where g B (.) and g NB (.) are their instantaneous profits, g B = px B − c x (x B ) 2 − t(x B − v B ) − 1 2 (vB ) 2 g NB = px NB − c x (x NB ) 2 − t(x NB − v NB ) − 1 2 (vNB ) 2 − δ. The strictly positive parameter ρ is a social discount factor. Thus, the instantaneous welfare φ is the sum of: (1) the economy’s output, that is also, the level of employment (remember that output and employment are one-to-one in this economy); (2) the total profits of Bs and NBs; (3) the squared volume of emissions and (4) the tax revenue. This function can be recognized as a reasonable approximation of the economy’s social surplus. The difference between the results of Dawid et al. (2005) and those of the present article stem directly from the different specification of the regulator’s objective function. In the former article, this function does not include the firm’s profit and is linear in the emissions. 2.3. Dynamics The firms switch between the two possible expectation-formation mechanisms (B or NB), according to a imitation-type dynamics, see Dawid (1999); Hofbauer and Sigmund (1998). Specifically, at each τ the firms meet randomly two-by-two, each pairing being equiprobable. At every encounter, the firm with the lower current profit adopts the belief of the other firm with a probability proportional to the current difference between the individual profits. Thus, on the average, the firms tend to adopt the type of prediction, N or NB, which may currently leads to the highest profits. Above mechanism gives rise to the dynamics. dπ =˙π = βπ(1 − π)g B − g NB . (6) dt Notice that ˙π reaches its maximum for π = 2 1 (the value or π for which the probability, for encounter between firms with different profits are (5)

106 Chirstophe Deissenberg and Pavel Ševčík<br />

with<br />

ϕ(t a ,t)= (πx B + (1 − π)x NB ) + πg B + (1 − π)g NB<br />

− (π(x B − v B ) + (1 − π)(x NB − v NB )) 2<br />

+ t(π(x B − v B ) + (1 − π)(x NB − v NB )), (4)<br />

where x B ,x NB ,v B ,v NB denote the production respectively, investment<br />

chosen by the believers B and the non-believers NB, and where g B (.)<br />

and g NB (.) are their instantaneous profits,<br />

g B = px B − c x (x B ) 2 − t(x B − v B ) − 1 2 (vB ) 2<br />

g NB = px NB − c x (x NB ) 2 − t(x NB − v NB ) − 1 2 (vNB ) 2 − δ.<br />

The strictly positive parameter ρ is a social discount factor.<br />

Thus, the instantaneous welfare φ is the sum of: (1) the economy’s<br />

output, that is also, the level of employment (remember that output and<br />

employment are one-to-one in this economy); (2) the total profits of Bs<br />

and NBs; (3) the squared volume of emissions and (4) the tax revenue. This<br />

function can be recognized as a reasonable approximation of the economy’s<br />

social surplus. The difference between the results of Dawid et al. (2005) and<br />

those of the present article stem directly from the different specification of<br />

the regulator’s objective function. In the former article, this function does<br />

not include the firm’s profit and is linear in the emissions.<br />

2.3. Dynamics<br />

The firms switch between the two possible expectation-formation mechanisms<br />

(B or NB), according to a imitation-type dynamics, see Dawid (1999);<br />

Hofbauer and Sigmund (1998). Specifically, at each τ the firms meet randomly<br />

two-by-two, each pairing being equiprobable. At every encounter,<br />

the firm with the lower current profit adopts the belief of the other firm with<br />

a probability proportional to the current difference between the individual<br />

profits. Thus, on the average, the firms tend to adopt the type of prediction,<br />

N or NB, which may currently leads to the highest profits. Above<br />

mechanism gives rise to the dynamics.<br />

dπ<br />

=˙π = βπ(1 − π)g B − g NB . (6)<br />

dt<br />

Notice that ˙π reaches its maximum for π =<br />

2 1 (the value or π for<br />

which the probability, for encounter between firms with different profits are<br />

(5)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!