10.03.2015 Views

Economic Models - Convex Optimization

Economic Models - Convex Optimization

Economic Models - Convex Optimization

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Cheap-talk Multiple Equilibria and Pareto 105<br />

period. Rather than expenditures in emission-reducing capital, γ can therefore<br />

be interpreted as the additional costs resulting of a temporary switch<br />

to a cleaner resource — for e.g., of a switch from coal to natural gas.<br />

The firms attempts to maximize their profit. As we shall see at a later<br />

place, one can assume without loss of generality that they disregard the<br />

future and maximize in every τ, their current instantaneous profit. However,<br />

the actual tax rate t enters their instantaneous profit function and is unknown<br />

at the time when they choose v. Thus, they need to base their optimal<br />

choice of v on an expectation (or, prediction) t e of t. In reality, a firm<br />

can invest larger or smaller amounts of money in order to make or less<br />

accurate predictions of the tax, the government will actually implement.<br />

In this model, we assume for simplicity that each firm has two (extreme)<br />

options for predicting the implemented tax. It can either suppose that R’s<br />

announcement is truthful, that is, that t will be equal to t a , or it can do costly<br />

research and try to better predict the t that will actually be implemented.<br />

Depending upon the expectation-formation mechanism the firm chooses,<br />

we speak of believer B or of a non-believer NB:<br />

A believer considers the regulator’s announcement to be truthful<br />

and sets<br />

t e = t a (3)<br />

This does not cost anything.<br />

A non-believer makes a “rational” prediction of t, considering the current<br />

number of Bs and NBs as constant. Making the prediction in any given<br />

period τ costs δ>0.<br />

Details on the derivation of the NBs’prediction will be given later. Note<br />

that a firm can change its choice of expectation-formation mechanism at<br />

any moment in time. That is, a B can become a NB, and vice versa. We<br />

denote with π = π(t) ∈ [0, 1] the current fraction of Bs in the population.<br />

Thus, 1 − π is the current fraction of NBs.<br />

2.2. The Regulator, R<br />

The regulator’s goal is to maximize with respect to t a ≥ 0 and t ≥ 0, the<br />

inter-temporal social welfare function.<br />

(t a ,t)=<br />

∫ ∞<br />

0<br />

e −ρτ ϕ(t a ,t)dτ

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!