HP Newsletter - Hospice Pharmacia
HP Newsletter - Hospice Pharmacia
HP Newsletter - Hospice Pharmacia
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
8<br />
Passionate for the Appropriate Use of Medication<br />
“Proven and Safer...”<br />
continued from page 1<br />
“I forgot my PIN!”<br />
- Mark Schreiber, Technical Support<br />
Manager<br />
We are delighted that more than 80%<br />
of our hospice clients are participating<br />
in the PIN (Personal Identification<br />
Number) program. The purpose of the<br />
PIN program is to comply with HIPAA’s<br />
Privacy Rule.<br />
Just a reminder: Even if a hospice team<br />
member does not use Xeris, he or she<br />
still needs a Xeris account in order to<br />
obtain a PIN number, as we establish<br />
and keep record of nurse profiles in<br />
Xeris. Every <strong>HP</strong> hospice has selected<br />
a Xeris <strong>Hospice</strong> Administrator (XHA)<br />
who serves as the Xeris security liaison<br />
between the hospice and <strong>HP</strong>. The XHA<br />
is authorized to create Xeris accounts<br />
and reset Xeris passwords. Since PIN<br />
is managed through Xeris, your XHA is<br />
authorized to reset your PIN, should you<br />
forget it what it is.<br />
You may also consult the Xeris Reference<br />
Manual with questions. An updated<br />
version of this manual may be found<br />
on the Xeris Welcome Page in the “<strong>HP</strong><br />
Announcements” section.<br />
Your Regional Director of Client<br />
Development (RDCD) is available to<br />
assist with any of the above steps. If you<br />
have any further questions regarding<br />
PIN, please contact your RDCD, or email<br />
<strong>HP</strong>Partners@excelleRx.com. If you are<br />
an XHA and require technical assistance,<br />
feel free to contact our Technical Support<br />
team at support@excellerx.com.<br />
• Insomnia: A statistically significant<br />
number of patients receiving temazepam<br />
(a first line therapy for insomnia in the<br />
MUGs) achieved a complete response as<br />
compared with zolpidem (52% vs. 22%,<br />
p < 0.05).<br />
- This finding suggests that <strong>HP</strong>’s first<br />
line therapy of temazepam is more<br />
effective in treating insomnia than<br />
zolpidem, a common medication<br />
that is used outside of the insomnia<br />
protocol.<br />
• Nausea: A statistically significant<br />
proportion of patients receiving<br />
prochlorperazine (<strong>HP</strong>’s first line therapy<br />
for nausea) achieved a complete response<br />
as compared to patients taking oral<br />
ondansetron, an expensive alternative<br />
commonly prescribed in the oncology<br />
community (48.9% vs. 26.7%; p < 0.05).<br />
The study also found a striking difference<br />
between patient groups that experienced<br />
worsened nausea control after initiating<br />
therapy (8.9% for prochlorperazine vs.<br />
26.7% for ondansetron, p < 0.05).<br />
- This finding suggests that<br />
ondansetron is not superior to<br />
prochlorperazine, in treating<br />
nausea that is secondary to an<br />
unknown etiology (e.g. not receiving<br />
chemotherapy or radiation).<br />
We launched the aforementioned study<br />
to test the hypothesis that <strong>HP</strong>’s evidencebased<br />
Medication Use Guidelines are<br />
associated with better hospice and patientrelated<br />
outcomes. Our findings suggest<br />
that evidence-based prescribing using the<br />
MUGs produces better patient outcomes<br />
when compared to “preference-based”<br />
prescribing.<br />
In addition, while this study was not<br />
constructed to analyze the cost-effectiveness<br />
of the symptom management medications<br />
selected for analysis, it is noteworthy that<br />
<strong>HP</strong>’s first-line therapies in this study are<br />
less costly than the non-MUG medications<br />
to which they were compared.<br />
These findings support the application of<br />
the MUGs as evidence-based guidelines<br />
that both improve symptom management<br />
and assure cost-appropriate medication<br />
selection for hospice patients, especially<br />
when applied under the prescriberdirected,<br />
pharmacist-driven Collaborative<br />
Practice model.<br />
The bottom line: When the right medication<br />
is selected the first time and the patient is<br />
monitored for therapeutic and potential or<br />
actual adverse effects, patients are not just<br />
more comfortable, they experience greater<br />
safety from untoward adverse medication<br />
outcomes. “Proven and safer”—goals that<br />
should concern every one of us—are within<br />
reach and available to our health care<br />
system’s frailest patients including those<br />
who are receiving hospice care as they<br />
approach the end of life.<br />
1<br />
Leape, L.L. , and Berwick, D.M. (2005). Five years<br />
after To Err is Human: What have we learned? JAMA,<br />
293 (19), 2384-2390.<br />
2<br />
Kohn, K.T., Corrigan, J.M., & Donaldson, M.<br />
(1999). To err is human: Building a safer health care<br />
system. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.<br />
excelleRx <strong>Newsletter</strong> Staff<br />
Editor In Chief:<br />
Orsula Voltis, PharmD, MBA<br />
Chief Marketing Officer<br />
orsula@excelleRx.com<br />
Managing Editor:<br />
Dana Filippoli<br />
Senior Director of Marketing<br />
dfilippoli@excelleRx.com<br />
Layout and Design:<br />
Melissa Morris<br />
Graphic Designer<br />
www.hospicepharmacia.com