08.03.2015 Views

Risk Management Annual Report - August 2009 ... - NHS Lanarkshire

Risk Management Annual Report - August 2009 ... - NHS Lanarkshire

Risk Management Annual Report - August 2009 ... - NHS Lanarkshire

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Risk</strong> <strong>Management</strong><br />

<strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong><br />

2008 – 09<br />

Electronic <strong>Risk</strong> <strong>Management</strong> System: DATIX<br />

Audit to Review the Electronic <strong>Management</strong> System: DATIX<br />

<strong>NHS</strong>L currently has a license that covers 6 DATIX modules: Incident Recording, <strong>Risk</strong><br />

Register, Complaints, Claims, PALS and Standards.<br />

As part of the overall review of the existing risk management guidance, the DATIX system<br />

was also subject to further audit of effectiveness reviewed in light of the findings.<br />

A report based on the following outcomes was received by the RMSG and improvements<br />

supported and subsequently implemented:<br />

Incidents<br />

The incident module has been in place across Primary Care since 2003 and <strong>NHS</strong>L–wide<br />

since 2006. With the exception of PSSD, all incidents are now recorded electronically<br />

on the system. PSSD record incidents on paper forms with this information then input<br />

to the Datix system.<br />

Current incident recording process:<br />

Any member of staff witnessing or involved in an incident of any type records<br />

this electronically on the DIF1 (Datix Incident Form).<br />

Incident goes in to holding area ready for verification using a DIF2 electronic<br />

form.<br />

The verifier is the line manager of the individual reporting the incident.<br />

Once verified the incident is automatically added to the main database.<br />

Anecdotal evidence suggested that members of staff completing the DIF1 and those<br />

verifying the DIF2 forms are finding some of the fields confusing and can often wrongly<br />

categorise a number of fields. In July 2008 the <strong>Risk</strong> <strong>Management</strong> Department carried<br />

out an audit of completed DIF1 and DIF2, which had remained unverified, to determine<br />

if this is the case and, if so, which fields may require to be reviewed. The results of this<br />

audit established that:<br />

ACTION:<br />

The name of the person involved in the incident was frequently left blank. This<br />

is now a mandatory field, with help text to guide those completing the form.<br />

Many members of staff completing the DIF1 form were completing the Division and<br />

Directorate fields incorrectly. The system is in the process of being reconfigured to<br />

reflect the current Divisional and Directorate structures. ‘Combo’ links reduce the<br />

number of options at each field which should in turn reduce the number of errors.<br />

The ‘type’ of incident is the first window which categorises the risk, if either this field<br />

and/or the next window ‘category’ are completed incorrectly subsequent reports<br />

will be inaccurate. A revised ‘type’ and ‘category’ dataset has been developed and<br />

is to be tested with members of staff recording incidents and with staff who draw<br />

reports from the system.<br />

Performance for Year 2008 – 09<br />

7

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!