08.03.2015 Views

Status of Children in Tanzania - 2012 - Tanzania Education Network ...

Status of Children in Tanzania - 2012 - Tanzania Education Network ...

Status of Children in Tanzania - 2012 - Tanzania Education Network ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Call for Action<br />

1.0 INTRODUCTION<br />

1.1 Description <strong>of</strong> the distribution <strong>of</strong> roles and responsibilities <strong>in</strong> the analysis<br />

team.<br />

Andrew S. T. Mchomvu<br />

Was the lead consultant who participated <strong>in</strong> shar<strong>in</strong>g the provided tool guide with SOS expert, customiz<strong>in</strong>g it to<br />

<strong>Tanzania</strong>n context, conducted meet<strong>in</strong>g with stakeholders at different levels, participate <strong>in</strong> desk review, field<br />

research at Kagera, Tanga, Kigoma, L<strong>in</strong>di, and Zanzibar, data clean<strong>in</strong>g, analys<strong>in</strong>g the data, writ<strong>in</strong>g report,<br />

visited stakeholders and f<strong>in</strong>aliz<strong>in</strong>g the report.<br />

Dr. Abu Mvungi<br />

Participated <strong>in</strong> desk review, conduct<strong>in</strong>g fieldwork research at Arusha, Kilimanjaro, and Dar es Salaam, also led<br />

data clean<strong>in</strong>g process and matched the data with major theme <strong>of</strong> the study, led the process <strong>of</strong> analys<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

data, writ<strong>in</strong>g report, and pro<strong>of</strong> red the f<strong>in</strong>al report version.<br />

1.2 Overall analysis process and methodologies applied.<br />

The Child Rights situational analysis <strong>of</strong> <strong>Tanzania</strong> is a process that lasted for fifty days from April to May <strong>2012</strong>.<br />

A team consist<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> experts from the Institute <strong>of</strong> Social Work, and SOS staffs work<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> different SOS<br />

<strong>Children</strong>‟s villages <strong>in</strong> <strong>Tanzania</strong>, namely Dar es Salaam, Zanzibar, Arusha, and Mwanza, DSW Dar es Salaam<br />

and Zanzibar led the analysis. The analysis was carried out through a process that <strong>in</strong>volved extensive<br />

documentary reviews conducted at ISW, UNICEF, Save the <strong>Children</strong>, REPOA, M<strong>in</strong>istry <strong>of</strong> Community<br />

Development Gender and <strong>Children</strong>, M<strong>in</strong>istry <strong>of</strong> Vocational <strong>Education</strong>al Tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g, M<strong>in</strong>istry <strong>of</strong> Health and Social<br />

Welfare, and M<strong>in</strong>istry <strong>of</strong> Home Affairs. The documentary reviews focused on identify<strong>in</strong>g similar experiences on<br />

the actual status <strong>of</strong> children without parental care and those at risk <strong>of</strong> los<strong>in</strong>g parental care. Further, identified<br />

the major child rights violated.<br />

The children right situational analysis used primary data <strong>in</strong>formation from the f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs collected from 14<br />

regions <strong>of</strong> <strong>Tanzania</strong>. The purposive sampl<strong>in</strong>g was used to determ<strong>in</strong>e study respondents. The study used<br />

documentary evidence to determ<strong>in</strong>e status <strong>of</strong> child rights situation <strong>in</strong> <strong>Tanzania</strong>. The data collection framework<br />

used an adopted guide developed by SOS children‟s villages Dar es Salaam <strong>2012</strong>. The tool is known as child<br />

rights situation analysis <strong>of</strong> children at risk <strong>of</strong> los<strong>in</strong>g parental care and children who have lost parental care.<br />

Focus Group Discussion Guide was used by target<strong>in</strong>g specific category <strong>of</strong> stakeholders regard<strong>in</strong>g violation <strong>of</strong><br />

children‟s rights at different scenario. In operationalise the tool 46 meet<strong>in</strong>gs were conducted 24 <strong>in</strong>terviews at<br />

district level 23 Focus group discussion were conducted, and 21 consultative meet<strong>in</strong>gs with primary and<br />

secondary stakeholders.<br />

1.3 Involvement <strong>of</strong> children, young people and families <strong>in</strong> the CRSA process as<br />

primary stakeholders<br />

<strong>Tanzania</strong> Child right situational analysis process started with collection <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>formation from target group, young<br />

people and families <strong>in</strong> <strong>Tanzania</strong>. Six (6) focus group discussion were conducted at Zanzibar to the targeted<br />

group <strong>of</strong> children at (2) Maziz<strong>in</strong>i, (3) Makunduchi, (1) Kizimkazi, (1 Mal<strong>in</strong>di, and (2) SOS <strong>Children</strong>‟s Villages<br />

Zanzibar. In Ma<strong>in</strong>land 14 FGD were conducted, 1 from each district selected. Interviews with young people<br />

were conducted at children‟s homes and retentions centres these <strong>in</strong>cluded 21 <strong>in</strong>terviews with children at prison<br />

and 5 retentions homes located at Arusha, Tanga, Moshi, Upanga, and Mbeya. Additionally, <strong>in</strong>terviews to<br />

youth at 10 prisons namely Muleba, L<strong>in</strong>di, Tukuyu, Ir<strong>in</strong>ga, Morogoro, Wami, Keko, Segerea, S<strong>in</strong>gida, and<br />

Arusha. These prisons are popular for keep<strong>in</strong>g young children. Interviews to children with sampled police<br />

stations like Mbeya, L<strong>in</strong>di, Muleba, and Kigoma were conducted. Some purposively selected families were also<br />

<strong>in</strong>terviewed at SOS <strong>Children</strong>‟s Villages Zanzibar, Ir<strong>in</strong>ga, Mbeya, Mara, Same, L<strong>in</strong>di, Kagera, and S<strong>in</strong>gida. The<br />

study <strong>in</strong>terviewed randomly chosen young people and families to generate <strong>in</strong>formation that can give actual<br />

picture <strong>of</strong> <strong>Tanzania</strong>n children‟s rights status by target<strong>in</strong>g those who have lost parents or are at risk <strong>of</strong> los<strong>in</strong>g<br />

parental care.<br />

1.4 Description <strong>of</strong> stakeholders 2 <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> the child right situational analysis<br />

process.<br />

Consultations with stakeholders was adm<strong>in</strong>istered at three levels, namely at National level, with stakeholders<br />

at m<strong>in</strong>isterial level where specific department deal<strong>in</strong>g with children were engaged. The second level was with<br />

NGOs, (FONGOS), In NGOs deal<strong>in</strong>g with targeted children. The third level was at district and community level,<br />

where primary target group <strong>of</strong> children resides. See table 1, which follows:<br />

1 / 55 <strong>Tanzania</strong>-CRSA-REPORT-<strong>2012</strong><br />

A lov<strong>in</strong>g home for every child

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!