43-101 2008 Technical Report On The La Fortuna Project, Durango ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

9. To the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the Technical Report contains all scientific and technical information that is required to be disclosed to make the Technical Report not misleading. 10. I am independent of the issuer applying all of the tests in section 1.5 of National Instrument 43-101. 11. I have read National Instrument 43-101 and Form 43-101F1, and the Technical Report has been prepared in compliance with that instrument and form. 12. I consent to the filing of the Technical Report with any stock exchange and other regulatory authority and any publication by them, including electronic publication in the public company files on their websites accessible by the public, of the Technical Report. DATED this 31st Day of July, 2008. (Signed and sealed) Daniel C. Leroux, B.Sc., P. Geo. 68
W.DOUGLAS ROY 35 Colbeck Street Halifax, Nova Scotia, PC CERTIFICATE of AUTHOR I, W. Douglas Roy, M.A.Sc., P.Eng. do hereby certify that: 1. I am an associate mining engineer with the firm of A.C.A. Howe International Limited, Mining and Geological Consultants located at 330 Bay St., Suite 830, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5H 2S6. 2. I obtained a Bachelor of Engineering degree from Dalhousie University in 1997 and a Master of Science Applied degree from Dalhousie University in 2000. 3. I am a Professional Engineer licensed to practice with Professional Engineers of Nova Scotia. 4. I have practiced my profession continuously since graduation for 10 years. 5. I have read the definition of “qualified person” set out in National Instrument 43-101 (“NI 43-101”) and certify that by reason of my education, affiliation with a professional association (as defined in NI 43-101) and past relevant work experience, I fulfill the requirements to be a “qualified person” for the purposes of NI 43-101. 6. I share responsibility for Section 16 of the technical report titled: “Technical Report on the El Castillo Gold Project, Durango, Mexico for Castle Gold Corporation dated July 31, 2008 (the “Technical Report”) I have not visited the El Castillo property. 7. I have not had prior involvement with the issuer, nor with the property that is the subject of the Technical Report. 8. I am not aware of any material fact or material change with respect to the subject matter of the Technical Report that is not reflected in the Technical Report, the omission to disclose which makes the Technical Report misleading. 9. To the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the Technical Report contains all scientific and technical information that is required to be disclosed to make the Technical Report not misleading. 10. I am independent of the issuer applying all of the tests in section 1.5 of National Instrument 43-101. 11. I have read National Instrument 43-101 and Form 43-101F1, and the Technical Report has been prepared in compliance with that instrument and form. 12. I consent to the filing of the Technical Report with any stock exchange and other regulatory authority and any publication by them, including electronic publication in the public company files on their websites accessible by the public, of the Technical Report. DATED this 31st Day of July, 2008. (Signed and sealed) W. Douglas Roy, M.A.Sc., P. Eng. 69
Page 1 and 2:
TECHNICAL REPORT ON THE EL CASTILLO
Page 3 and 4:
SUMMARY Introduction At the request
Page 5 and 6:
Castillo Remaining Mineral Resource
Page 7 and 8:
Undiluted Reserves at $550 per Ounc
Page 9 and 10:
epresent an incremental increase in
Page 11 and 12:
TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION
Page 13 and 14:
Table 4. Driving distances from Dur
Page 15 and 16:
Castle Gold has accepted that the q
Page 17 and 18:
2.0 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION, LOCATION,
Page 19 and 20:
Figure 2. Map showing mining conces
Page 21 and 22:
2.1.2.3 Property Taxes The property
Page 23 and 24:
Table 5. Maximum precipitation in a
Page 25 and 26:
3.0 HISTORY The El Castillo Project
Page 27 and 28: commonly reach elevations of 2,500
Page 29 and 30: Figure 4. Cross-section through the
Page 31 and 32: At El Castillo, the presence of cha
Page 33 and 34: Toward the center of the mineralize
Page 35 and 36: 7.0 EXPLORATION In 2006, Castle Gol
Page 37 and 38: 9.0 SAMPLING METHOD AND APPROACH Th
Page 39 and 40: 11.0 DATA VERIFICATION 11.1 INTRODU
Page 41 and 42: Morgain Minerals Inc. El Cairo Gold
Page 43 and 44: 13.0 MINERAL PROCESSING AND METALLU
Page 45 and 46: Table 9. Castle Gold test heap leac
Page 47 and 48: material is relatively consistent a
Page 49 and 50: Plate 6. View of the El Castillo si
Page 51 and 52: 14.2.1 Methods A shift of -500,000
Page 53 and 54: 14.2.4 Pit Optimization Parameters
Page 55 and 56: Undiluted Reserves at $600 per Ounc
Page 57 and 58: Table 13. Comparison of Howe 2003 a
Page 59 and 60: 15.2.2 Change of Land Use The Compa
Page 61 and 62: 16.2.1 Capital and Operating Cost E
Page 63 and 64: Table 15. Operating Cost Summary (U
Page 65 and 66: will be operating the mine indirect
Page 67: Table 17. Sensitivity Analysis - Gr
Page 70 and 71: 16.2.2 Economic Evaluation The Base
Page 72 and 73: Table 23. US$ - Mexican Peso Exchan
Page 74 and 75: • Castle Gold should complete geo
Page 76 and 77: Panteleyev, A., 1996, Epithermal Au
Page 80 and 81: CERTIFICATE OF AUTHOR dated July 31
Page 82 and 83: Appendix A Pit Optimization Level P
show all

43-101 2008 Technical Report On The La Fortuna Project, Durango ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?