Between Heathenism and Christianity - College of Stoic Philosophers
Between Heathenism and Christianity - College of Stoic Philosophers
Between Heathenism and Christianity - College of Stoic Philosophers
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Seneca: His Character <strong>and</strong> Environment<br />
mind in his defense <strong>of</strong> riches. He can see no harm<br />
in large possessions when they have been honestly, or<br />
at least lawfully, acquired <strong>and</strong> are properly<br />
used. It<br />
may help us to underst<strong>and</strong> his attitude in this matter<br />
if we compare<br />
it with that <strong>of</strong> some <strong>of</strong> the ministers<br />
<strong>of</strong> our own day, <strong>and</strong> with some <strong>of</strong> the ecclesiastical<br />
dignitaries <strong>of</strong> the past,<br />
Seneca s philosophy<br />
did not<br />
come to him as a divine comm<strong>and</strong>. It was the fruit<br />
<strong>of</strong> his own cogitation in the search for the supreme<br />
good. But there are men in our day, as there have<br />
always been, who are not only members <strong>of</strong> the church<br />
but preachers <strong>of</strong> the Gospel, who are both rich<br />
themselves <strong>and</strong> apologists <strong>of</strong> the rich. Yet they pro<br />
fess to be followers <strong>of</strong> the Son <strong>of</strong> God; <strong>of</strong> Him who<br />
taught that it is exceedingly difficult for a rich man<br />
to enter the kingdom <strong>of</strong> heaven. Seneca did not<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>ess to seek this kingdom. His search was after<br />
the kingdom <strong>of</strong> earthly felicity, <strong>and</strong> he could not see<br />
why riches should be an obstacle to his entering it.<br />
Seneca was a good exemplar <strong>of</strong> the truth <strong>of</strong> a say<br />
ing quoted by Xenophon in his Memorabilia <strong>of</strong> So<br />
crates to the effect that even an upright man is some<br />
times good, sometimes bad.<br />
His writings convey the<br />
impression that their author is always under stress.<br />
The philosophical composure <strong>of</strong> which he has much to<br />
say, is an aspiration <strong>and</strong> a hope, not a fruition. When<br />
he speaks <strong>of</strong> the passions he sees them in their intensi<br />
ty.<br />
He seems to regard all men as either very good or<br />
very bad, <strong>and</strong> finds the latter class to include the great<br />
body<br />
<strong>of</strong> mankind. He fails to realize that the ma<br />
ss