06.03.2015 Views

Lawyer of a Society As a Fiduciary

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

While the appellate court affirmed the trial court’s dismissal, it is apparent<br />

that the decision was influenced by the monumental stupidity <strong>of</strong> the<br />

plaintiff’s legal theory!<br />

VI<br />

Civil Conspiracy<br />

“Civil conspiracy is a separate cause <strong>of</strong> action that requires, interalia,<br />

1. an underlying tort and a ’meeting <strong>of</strong> the minds’ among the co-conspirator<br />

’on the object or course <strong>of</strong> action’ to be taken. By contrast, a cause <strong>of</strong><br />

action requires only the knowing participation <strong>of</strong> a party in a breach<br />

<strong>of</strong> a fiduciary duty and does not require a conspiratorial agreement.”<br />

2. Second, the breach <strong>of</strong> fiduciary duties or scheme <strong>of</strong> oppression must<br />

involve misrepresentations, failure to disclose, or deceptive conduct so<br />

that breach <strong>of</strong> fiduciary duties constitutes fraudulent conduct.<br />

3. Third, the plaintiff must plead and prove that the attorney had knowledge<br />

<strong>of</strong> the object and purpose <strong>of</strong> the conspiracy; that there was an<br />

understanding or agreement to inflict a wrong against, or injury on,<br />

the third party; that there was a meeting <strong>of</strong> minds on the object or<br />

cause <strong>of</strong> action; and that there was some mutual mental action coupled<br />

with an intent to commit the act that resulted in the injury.<br />

4. Finally, the plaintiff must plead and prove that the attorney’s conduct<br />

went beyond mere fulfillment <strong>of</strong> his pr<strong>of</strong>essional duties to the majority<br />

shareholder.<br />

In the present context <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Society</strong> counsel, all the above are satisfied.<br />

Certainly, personal benefit from the proceeds <strong>of</strong> the fraud would certainly<br />

satisfy this burden. Here in the present context, <strong>Society</strong> counsel benefited<br />

from the appointment as legal counsel <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Society</strong> over a prolonged period.<br />

VII<br />

Fraudulent Scheme<br />

The plaintiff could also plead and prove conduct by the attorney necessary<br />

to the accomplishment <strong>of</strong> the fraudulent scheme, such as meaningless work<br />

designed to convey a false impression. The illegitimate and illegal Rules <strong>of</strong><br />

the <strong>Society</strong> and the <strong>Society</strong>’s insistence on compliance <strong>of</strong> the members <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>Society</strong> to these Rules are sufficient to prove this. The “welfare” facade <strong>of</strong><br />

the <strong>Society</strong> that it is engaged in some noble welfare activity for the veteran<br />

is another fraudulent scheme.<br />

6

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!