Lawyer of a Society As a Fiduciary

NOT employed by a Trustee company providing services of trusteeship and
his compensation did not come from the trustee company funds! Hence, the
beneficiary members of the Society are the actual clients of the legal counsel
because the funds came from the Members of the Society! Thus, he decidedly,
deliberately, knowingly and willingly violated his fiduciary duties to his
actual clients.
XII
Conclusion
The acts of the legal counsel are hence “unconscionable” from this legal
theory alone.
The reasoning behind such a rule (that a legal counsel is criminally liable)
is that society rightfully wishes to discourage attorneys from making such
suggestions to clients. The same rationale applies to advising clients to breach
fiduciary duties. Since such advice is to be discouraged, attorneys who proffer
it should be held liable to the extent they cause harm.
Legal counsel of the Society should prepare to be charged with criminal
liability on the basis of this legal theory alone. Where all the counsel from A
to Z from the “legal counsel” are illegal, is it possible that the counsel was
referring to laws unknown or conflicting with the laws of the land? Or, could
it be that all the advise of the counsel and the decisions of the defendant
monumental stupidity of his legal theory? One such theory seems to be
that Society can be compelled to be compliant to the rule of law only if
its aggrieved members take them to the court, not other wise with all the
exhortations to comply with the law. For us, the essence of adjudication
is the opportunity to state our case in our own words to some one who is
listening.
**********************************
10