05.03.2015 Views

3.6M north10.pdf - Dean-O's Toy Box

3.6M north10.pdf - Dean-O's Toy Box

3.6M north10.pdf - Dean-O's Toy Box

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

160 High-Power Microwave-Tube Transmitters<br />

charge is increasingly intolerable. (Remember what we used to pick up on the<br />

AM car radio when we drove near high-tension wires, especially on a foggy<br />

day?)<br />

We have discussed the fact that the removal of charge from a capacitor bank,<br />

no matter how large, will result in its terminal voltage being smaller than it was<br />

before the charge-removal interval, or pulse. In the interpulse interval, therefore,<br />

it will be necessary to replace the charge removed during the pulse. In the<br />

discussion of line-type modulators, much was made of the issue of recharging<br />

without incurring energy loss if the current was limited by resistance. Is there a<br />

similar concern when it comes to replacing partial discharge? The answer is not<br />

nearly as much. The reason for this is shown graphically in Fig. 10-6, which plots<br />

energy removed from the dc power supply, energy transferred to the capacitor<br />

bank, and energy dissipated in series resistance versus the per-unit amount that<br />

the capacitor is discharged each pulse. (This graph assumes that the resistance is<br />

small enough so that the RC time-constant is less than approximately 1/3 of the<br />

minimum interpulse interval, assuring that the capacitor will recharge to approximately<br />

the power-supply terminal voltage between pulses.) If we look at<br />

full discharge, or per-unit discharge of unity, the results are familiar. The perunit<br />

capacitor energy transfer and resistor energy dissipation are both unity, and<br />

the per-unit energy removed from the power supply is 2. Notice, however, that<br />

only the energy removed from the power supply is a linear function of per-unit<br />

discharge voltage. For less-than-unity per-unit discharge, energy transferred to<br />

the capacitor falls off less rapidly than dissipation in the resistor. Therefore, the<br />

efficiency of energy transfer increases as AV/Vdecreases.<br />

The reason for this can be seen if we note the change in charge during a pulse<br />

of current, AQ = CAV, and the change in capacitor energy, AW = AQ, times average<br />

capacitor voltage during discharge, which can be expressed as<br />

~Avx<br />

V+ V–AV<br />

2<br />

or<br />

~vAv _ C(AV)2<br />

The energy removed from the power supply during recharge is AQ times the<br />

power supply voltage, which can be expressed as CAV x V. Recharging efficiency<br />

is the ratio of energy transferred to the capacitor to the energy removed from the<br />

power supply, or<br />

2“<br />

+Av-a=,<br />

——— l[AV)<br />

CVAV 2V”

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!