reprap-granule-extruder-tudelft1
reprap-granule-extruder-tudelft1 reprap-granule-extruder-tudelft1
A | Blender granule tests 3. Blending 1 minute, four large flat pieces (size around 13cm x 5,5cm; ±10gram) Input Blender Output Thoughts More material does result into a higher number of smaller pieces and is therefore a better result than test 1, but still worse than test 2. - What would happen if we filled the blender with the same amount material but then crumpled (larger volume, perhaps more impact). 4. Blending 1 minute, four large crumpled pieces (size around 13cm x 5,5cm; ±10gram) Input Blender Output Thoughts The First good results are in, lot of small pieces but there are still some larger parts. - The pieces bounce up and down, perhaps a smaller blender would fulfil better (might blend the material quicker). We think if we would fill the blender to the top the upper parts won’t hit the blender so a smaller blender would fit better. - Some extreme small pieces become static and are sticking to the side of the blender. - Longer blending could probably result into better pieces. 32 | Prototyping Lab (IO3028) - RepRap Recycle Add-on
A | Blender granule tests 5. Blending 1 minute, a number of medium flat pieces 5. Blending (size around 1 minute, 5,5cm a x 5,5cm; number ±10gram) of medium flat pieces Input (size around 5,5cm Blender x 5,5cm; ±10gram) Output Input Blender Output Thoughts Thoughts Tryout with smaller flat pieces reasonable result but still a lot of large parts. Tryout - with These smaller smaller flat pieces are reasonable blending result better but than still the a straight lot of large larger parts. pieces (test 1 and - These 3), perhaps smaller because pieces they are blending are small better then the than width the straight of the blender larger pieces container. (test 1 and 3), perhaps because they are small then the width of the blender container. 6. Blending 1 minute, a number of medium crumpled pieces 6. Blending (size around 1 minute, 5,5cm a x 5,5cm; number ±10gram) of medium crumpled pieces Input (size around 5,5cm Blender x 5,5cm; ±10gram) Output Input Blender Output Thoughts Thoughts The result shows less variation but there seems to be more not useful parts The -result Small shows crumples less variation bounce but more there up a seems done then to be larger more crumples, not useful size partsof the crumple - Small is too crumples small for the bounce blender. more up a done then larger crumples, size of the crumple is too small for the blender. 7. Blending 1 minute, a lot of small flat pieces (size around 1,5cm x 1,5cm; ±10gram) Input Blender Output Thoughts The output looks nearly the same as the input. 33 | Prototyping Lab (IO3028) - RepRap Recycle Add-on - The input pieces bounce a lot, the blades hardly cut the material. - We are glad this does not work because it is a lot of work to cut a milk bottle as
- Page 1 and 2: Developing a plastics recycling add
- Page 3 and 4: Table of Contents 1. Introduction 5
- Page 5 and 6: 1 İntroduction The RepRap is a 3D
- Page 7 and 8: 2 | The RepRap project Fused deposi
- Page 9 and 10: 3 | From product to granule Possibl
- Page 11 and 12: 3 | From product to granule Figure
- Page 13 and 14: 3 | From product to granule As for
- Page 15 and 16: 4 | From granule to extrusion decre
- Page 17 and 18: 4 | From granule to extrusion threa
- Page 19 and 20: 4 | From granule to extrusion screw
- Page 21 and 22: 4 | From granule to extrusion Figur
- Page 23 and 24: 5 Ȧdapting the prototype to the Re
- Page 25 and 26: 6 Ċonclusion and discussion The ma
- Page 27 and 28: 7 Ṙecommendations for further dev
- Page 29 and 30: 8 Ṙeferences 1 - Bowyer, A. 1992.
- Page 31: Appendix A Blender granule tests 1.
- Page 35 and 36: - Granule still bounces up without
- Page 37 and 38: A | Blender granule tests 13. Blend
- Page 39 and 40: Appendix B. Technical drawings of t
- Page 41 and 42: 50 5 5 10 25 50 50 10 R8 5 25 1 10
- Page 43 and 44: M16 20 25 14 2 30° 7 nozzle benami
- Page 45 and 46: Appendix C. Extrusion screw manufac
A | Blender <strong>granule</strong> tests<br />
5. Blending 1 minute, a number of medium flat pieces<br />
5. Blending (size around 1 minute, 5,5cm a x 5,5cm; number ±10gram) of medium flat pieces<br />
Input (size around 5,5cm Blender x 5,5cm; ±10gram) Output<br />
Input Blender Output<br />
Thoughts<br />
Thoughts<br />
Tryout with smaller flat pieces reasonable result but still a lot of large parts.<br />
Tryout - with These smaller smaller flat pieces are reasonable blending result better but than still the a straight lot of large larger parts. pieces (test 1 and<br />
- These 3), perhaps smaller because pieces they are blending are small better then the than width the straight of the blender larger pieces container. (test 1 and<br />
3), perhaps because they are small then the width of the blender container.<br />
6. Blending 1 minute, a number of medium crumpled pieces<br />
6. Blending (size around 1 minute, 5,5cm a x 5,5cm; number ±10gram) of medium crumpled pieces<br />
Input (size around 5,5cm Blender x 5,5cm; ±10gram) Output<br />
Input Blender Output<br />
Thoughts<br />
Thoughts<br />
The result shows less variation but there seems to be more not useful parts<br />
The -result Small shows crumples less variation bounce but more there up a seems done then to be larger more crumples, not useful size partsof the crumple<br />
- Small is too crumples small for the bounce blender. more up a done then larger crumples, size of the crumple<br />
is too small for the blender.<br />
7. Blending 1 minute, a lot of small flat pieces<br />
(size around 1,5cm x 1,5cm; ±10gram)<br />
Input Blender Output<br />
Thoughts<br />
The output looks nearly the same as the input.<br />
33 | Prototyping Lab (IO3028) - RepRap Recycle Add-on<br />
- The input pieces bounce a lot, the blades hardly cut the material.<br />
- We are glad this does not work because it is a lot of work to cut a milk bottle as
Change language