03.03.2015 Views

Evidence on the Adequacy of First Nations Consultation - BC Hydro ...

Evidence on the Adequacy of First Nations Consultation - BC Hydro ...

Evidence on the Adequacy of First Nations Consultation - BC Hydro ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

DRAFT REPORT: Rights and Title Interests in <strong>the</strong> Columbia Valley Transmissi<strong>on</strong> Project Area<br />

3.0 FIRST NATIONS WHO MAY CLAIMS RIGHTS AND TITLE<br />

INTERESTS<br />

Several <strong>First</strong> Nati<strong>on</strong>s’ political organizati<strong>on</strong>s are claiming interests in all or porti<strong>on</strong>s <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

proposed Columbia Valley Transmissi<strong>on</strong> Project area. These organizati<strong>on</strong>s are: <strong>the</strong> Ktunaxa<br />

Nati<strong>on</strong>; <strong>the</strong> Secwepemc Nati<strong>on</strong>; <strong>the</strong> Shuswap Indian Band, and; <strong>the</strong> Sexqeltkemc or Lakes<br />

Divisi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Secwepemc Nati<strong>on</strong> (comprised <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Nesk<strong>on</strong>lith, Adams Lake, and Splatsin<br />

[Spallumcheen] Bands).<br />

The overlapping claims put forward by <strong>the</strong>se Aboriginal organizati<strong>on</strong>s arise from overlapping<br />

asserti<strong>on</strong>s <strong>of</strong> rights and title. There is also disagreement am<strong>on</strong>g <strong>the</strong> Aboriginal claimants <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

identificati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> appropriate political entity that may hold <strong>the</strong> rights and title interests.<br />

Hence, <strong>the</strong>re is disagreement am<strong>on</strong>g <strong>the</strong> <strong>First</strong> Nati<strong>on</strong>s <strong>the</strong>mselves regarding whose interests <strong>the</strong>y<br />

purport to represent, with occasi<strong>on</strong>al c<strong>on</strong>flicts separating individual “Band” interests from those<br />

being asserted by larger “Nati<strong>on</strong>” governments, resulting in dual organizati<strong>on</strong>s claiming to<br />

represent <strong>the</strong> same aboriginal interests. There is disagreement <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> history <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Shuswap<br />

Indian Band who assert ancient Aboriginal rights and title interests, with <strong>the</strong> result that this Band<br />

is in c<strong>on</strong>flict with <strong>the</strong> Ktunaxa Nati<strong>on</strong>, with <strong>the</strong> former government not recognizing <strong>the</strong> Band’s<br />

political aut<strong>on</strong>omy or <strong>the</strong> Band’s interpretati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> historical data <strong>on</strong> which its claim rests.<br />

The following secti<strong>on</strong> discusses <strong>the</strong> identity and interrelati<strong>on</strong>ship <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se claimant groups and<br />

reviews <strong>the</strong> territory being claimed by <strong>the</strong>m, as presented by <strong>the</strong> <strong>First</strong> Nati<strong>on</strong>s, <strong>the</strong>mselves, in<br />

corresp<strong>on</strong>dence, reports, treaty statements, and through <strong>First</strong> Nati<strong>on</strong>-sp<strong>on</strong>sored web pages <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

internet. Informati<strong>on</strong> presented here focuses <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> data used by <strong>the</strong> specific group for <strong>the</strong> basis<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir claim.<br />

The discussi<strong>on</strong> that follows is divided into three secti<strong>on</strong>s based solely <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> Aboriginal speech<br />

community, in order to address most easily <strong>the</strong> complex relati<strong>on</strong>ships between particular<br />

claimant groups: Ktunaxa or Kutenai-speaking claimants (2.1), and ; Secwepemc or Shuswapspeaking<br />

claimants, including <strong>the</strong> Sexqeltkemc or Lakes Divisi<strong>on</strong> as well as <strong>the</strong> co-called “Snare<br />

Indians” (2.2).<br />

3.1 Political Representati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> Ktunaxa or Kutenai-speaking claimants<br />

In 1970, a single political organizati<strong>on</strong> known as <strong>the</strong> Kootenay Indian District Council was<br />

established to represent all <strong>the</strong> Ktunaxa Bands in British Columbia. Between <strong>the</strong> years 1991 and<br />

2005 this organizati<strong>on</strong> also included <strong>the</strong> Secwepemc-speaking Shuswap Indian Band at<br />

Invermere and was known by <strong>the</strong> name “Ktunaxa/ Kinbasket Tribal Council” (KKTC). Since <strong>the</strong><br />

departure <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Shuswap Band in 2005, however, <strong>the</strong> name changed to “Ktunaxa Nati<strong>on</strong><br />

Council” (KNC). Documents available <strong>on</strong>line indicate that <strong>the</strong> split was not welcomed by <strong>the</strong><br />

Ktunaxa who c<strong>on</strong>tinue to assert <strong>the</strong>ir earlier occupati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Invermere area and <strong>the</strong> superior<br />

Bouchard & Kennedy Research C<strong>on</strong>sultants Page 56<br />

Page 59 <strong>of</strong> 200

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!