Evidence on the Adequacy of First Nations Consultation - BC Hydro ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

2 – Consultation Activities Since 11 March 2010 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Further information sharing by email and by telephone between the KNC and BC Hydro occurred between April 15 and April 21, 2010. This included the sharing of updated maps, and discussions around Project benefits, impact management and procurement opportunities. On April 21, 2010, BC Hydro sent a letter to the KNC and its member First Nations and enclosed a copy of BCTC’s Toby Creek Diversion Supplement that had been filed with the BCUC on April 20, 2010. The KNC had underlined the importance of avoidance of the goat habitat at Toby Creek as a very significant environmental issue related to the Project. Also on April 21, 2010, by email, BC Hydro provided to the KNC written responses to the concerns that the KNC had raised with regard to the Environmental Overview Assessment (EOA). KNC’s concerns are expressed in documents dated January 5, January 12 and January 20, 2010 in BCTC’s response to BCUC IR 1.51.1. Three additional individual concerns which were provided by email on or before April 29, 2010. A copy of BC Hydro’s responses (three documents) can be found in Appendix A to this Supplement. BC Hydro understands that KNC is reviewing the responses and BC Hydro expects further discussions with KNC on some of the issues. On April 30, 2010, the KNC provided BC Hydro/BCTC with the first of three reports regarding their Aboriginal Use and Interest Study (Robertson, 2010) (the AUIS) for the Project area. No new Project specific issues were raised in this report. A copy of the Robertson report is attached. The KNC indicated that they had hoped to provide all three of their AUIS reports to BC Hydro in advance of this supplemental filing for BC Hydro’s consideration but they were only able to deliver the one report. BC Hydro understands that the other two reports will be filed by the KNC as part of its proposed evidentiary filing in this proceeding. BCTC Columbia Valley Transmission Project – <strong>Evidence</strong> on Adequacy of First Nations Consultation 4 7 May 2010
2 – Consultation Activities Since 11 March 2010 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 On May 3, 2010, BC Hydro met with the KNC in Cranbrook to continue consultation and negotiations regarding benefits, impact management and procurement and the related agreements. On May 6, 2010, BC Hydro and BCTC met with the KNC and the Ministry of Environment (MoE) in Fairmont Hot Springs to discuss the KNC’s concerns regarding access management on the proposed CVT project right‐of‐way. BC Hydro, BCTC and KNC will continue to discuss benefit, impact management and procurement opportunities and are working towards appropriate agreements as soon as reasonably possible. The next meeting between BC Hydro, BCTC and the KNC is scheduled for May 14, 2010 to continue those discussions and to continue to share AUIS and other Project information. BC Hydro and NDC continue discussions regarding the specialty forestry work which is scheduled to begin in the summer of 2010, and the clearing and road access work. Copies of the various letters and other materials sent to and received from the KNC are included in Appendix A. 2.2 Shuswap Indian Band (SIB) On March 16, 2010, BC Hydro delivered signed copies of the Benefits Agreement and the Contracting Agreement to the SIB. These agreements were previously filed in confidence with the BCUC. On April 1, 2010, BC Hydro provided the SIB with a letter and enclosed a copy of BCUC Commission Order G‐54‐10 which laid out the regulatory timetable for the Project, and highlighted the fact that there was to be a community input session on April 15, 2010 in Invermere. A copy of that letter and order was also faxed to the SIB that same day. On April 21, 2010, BC Hydro sent a letter to the SIB and enclosed a copy of BCTC’s Toby Creek Diversion Supplement that was filed with the BCUC on April 20, 2010. BCTC Columbia Valley Transmission Project – <strong>Evidence</strong> on Adequacy of First Nations Consultation 5 7 May 2010
Page 1 and 2: Janet L. Fraser Director, Regulator
Page 3 and 4: Table of Contents 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Page 5: 2 - Consultation Activities Since 1
Page 9 and 10: 2 - Consultation Activities Since 1
Page 15 and 16: 3 - Consultation Assessment 1 2 3 4
Page 23 and 24: Page 1 of 200
Page 25 and 26: DRAFT REPORT: Rights and Title Inte
Page 57 and 58:
DRAFT REPORT: Rights and Title Inte
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
BC hudro m FOR GENERATIONS Chris He
Page 111 and 112:
BC hydro m FOR GENERATIONS Chris He
Page 113 and 114:
BC hydro en FOR GENE RATION S Chris
Page 115 and 116:
Page 93 of 200
Page 117 and 118:
BC hydro FOR GENERATION S Chris Hea
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
BC hydro m FOR GENERAT IONS Chris H
Page 127 and 128:
TERMS OF REFERENCE (TR) CVT - Archa
Page 129 and 130:
TERMS OF REFERENCE (TR) PART 1 - TE
Page 131 and 132:
TERMS OF REFERENCE (TR) existing ac
Page 133 and 134:
TERMS OF REFERENCE (TR) at the begi
Page 135 and 136:
J ./ FOR GENERATIONS Chris Heard BC
Page 137 and 138:
BC hgdro m FOR GENERATIONS Chris He
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
BC hydr-o m FOR GENERATIONS Chris H
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
BC hgdro m FOR GENERATIONS Chris He
Page 149 and 150:
BC hudro m FOR GENERATIONS Chris He
Page 151 and 152:
BC hgdr-o m FOR GENERATIONS Chris H
Page 153 and 154:
Page 127 of 200
Page 155 and 156:
KTUNAXA NATION COUNCIL BCTC RESPONS
Page 157 and 158:
KTUNAXA NATION COUNCIL BCTC RESPONS
Page 159 and 160:
3 Section 4.4.2.1 Canyon Creek- Rep
Page 161 and 162:
3, 4 & 5 Just north of the Frances
Page 163 and 164:
Wildlife and Wildlife Habitat 1 The
Page 165 and 166:
THE KTUNAXA NATION AND THE UPPER CO
Page 167 and 168:
THE KTUNAXA NATION AND THE UPPER CO
Page 169 and 170:
3. APPROACH OF THIS STUDY The main
Page 171 and 172:
BEC: ICH only; wet and cool Wildlif
Page 173 and 174:
Figure 2. Traditional territory of
Page 175 and 176:
The Inissimi Complex was defined fo
Page 177 and 178:
Another group of Ktunaxa, the Qatmu
Page 179 and 180:
Perhaps the greatest of these impac
Page 181 and 182:
The first trading post in Ktunaxa t
Page 183 and 184:
the Tobacco Plains area for three m
Page 185 and 186:
Callesauilk [Upper Kootenays] 91 12
Page 187 and 188:
Kinbaskit, the Chief, who is nearly
Page 189 and 190:
little in the way of fresh insights
Page 191 and 192:
three of their children including F
Page 193 and 194:
Although these accounts confirm tha
Page 195 and 196:
Fig. 4 - From Flanagan’s Indian T
Page 197 and 198:
12. ETHNOGRAPHIC ASSESSMENTS OF TER
Page 199 and 200:
2. James Teit Around the turn of th
Page 201 and 202:
Another example comes from a map as
Page 203 and 204:
The Columbia Lakes moved down the C
Page 205 and 206:
9. Ktunaxa Territory, according to
Page 207 and 208:
Salmon played an important part in
Page 209 and 210:
6. Allan Smith In 1984, on behalf o
Page 211 and 212:
6. Randy Bouchard and Dorothy Kenne
Page 213 and 214:
BIBLIOGRAPHY for KTUNAXA AIUS -THE
Page 215 and 216:
California: The Arthur H. Clarke Co
Page 217 and 218:
Page 195 of 200
Page 219 and 220:
Page 197 of 200
Page 221 and 222:
Page 199 of 200
show all

Evidence on the Adequacy of First Nations Consultation - BC Hydro ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?