Evidence on the Adequacy of First Nations Consultation - BC Hydro ...
Evidence on the Adequacy of First Nations Consultation - BC Hydro ... Evidence on the Adequacy of First Nations Consultation - BC Hydro ...
3 – Consultation Assessment 1 2 (e) The Project will not undergo either a BC Environmental Assessment Act review nor a Canadian Environmental Assessment Act review; 3 4 5 (f) The CPCN is the major regulatory approval required to proceed with the Project and if granted, and subject to securing necessary land tenures and licenses, would allow BCTC to proceed with construction of the Project; 6 7 8 9 (g) The Project will require a Crown Land License of Occupation from the Integrated Land Management Bureau (ILMB) for the transmission line right‐of‐way over the Crown lands in the Project area. The application for this license will be referred to the potentially affected First Nations; and 10 11 (h) All Project assets will be owned and operated by BC Hydro and BCTC, provincial Crown Corporations regulated by the B.C. Utilities Commission. 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 3.4 Haida Spectrum 3.4.1 KNC BC Hydro is of the view that the level of consultation in respect of the KNC and its members is probably in the medium to high range of the Haida spectrum. BC Hydro’s view is based on its preliminary assessment that (1) the claims of the KNC member First Nations are reasonable and (2) the Project impacts on asserted Aboriginal rights are likely to be, on balance, low to medium. 3.4.2 SIB BC Hydro is of the view that the level of consultation in respect of the SIB is probably in the medium to high range of the Haida spectrum based on BC Hydro’s preliminary assessment that (1) the claims of the SIB are reasonable and (2) the Project impacts on asserted Aboriginal rights are likely to be, on balance, low to medium. BCTC Columbia Valley Transmission Project –
3 – Consultation Assessment 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 3.4.3 Other SNTC Members In respect of the other First Nations who are members of the SNTC, BC Hydro is of the view that the level of consultation is, at the most, at the low end of the Haida spectrum. This view is informed by BC Hydro’s preliminary assessment that the Project area is located a significant distance from many of these First Nations. In addition, many of the members of the SNTC have deferred to the SIB in consultation with BC Hydro in respect of the Project, which supports BC Hydro’s view that these First Nations have much less interest in the Project area than the SIB. 3.4.4 SALD In the specific context of SALD, BC Hydro is of the view that the consultation obligation is at the low of the spectrum. SALD has claimed a very large area and, until very recently, had deferred to the SIB’s leadership role in consultation. The information BC Hydro has reviewed indicates that the SIB has a much stronger claim to the Project area. 3.5 Adequacy of Consultation All First Nations identified by BC Hydro have received notice of the Project and other Project information, access to funding, a copy of the Application and related materials, and information regarding the BCUC Application hearing process. 3.5.1 KNC BC Hydro has engaged in extensive consultation in good faith with the KNC and is continuing to do so. BC Hydro acknowledges that the KNC has also engaged in the consultation in good faith, has raised issues of importance to the KNC and its member First Nations, and has participated in good faith negotiations regarding benefits, impact management and procurement opportunities. In specific response to the KNC’s concerns, BCTC has changed the transmission line route (Toby Creek diversion) and has committed to avoid riparian habitat as much as possible. BC Hydro and BCTC have also committed to receiving and considering input on BCTC Columbia Valley Transmission Project –
- Page 1 and 2: Janet L. Fraser Director, Regulator
- Page 3 and 4: Table of Contents 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
- Page 5 and 6: 2 - Consultation Activities Since 1
- Page 7 and 8: 2 - Consultation Activities Since 1
- Page 9 and 10: 2 - Consultation Activities Since 1
- Page 11 and 12: 2 - Consultation Activities Since 1
- Page 13 and 14: 2 - Consultation Activities Since 1
- Page 15 and 16: 3 - Consultation Assessment 1 2 3 4
- Page 17: 3 - Consultation Assessment 1 2 3 4
- Page 21 and 22: 3 - Consultation Assessment 1 2 3 4
- Page 23 and 24: Page 1 of 200
- Page 25 and 26: DRAFT REPORT: Rights and Title Inte
- Page 27 and 28: DRAFT REPORT: Rights and Title Inte
- Page 29 and 30: DRAFT REPORT: Rights and Title Inte
- Page 31 and 32: DRAFT REPORT: Rights and Title Inte
- Page 33 and 34: DRAFT REPORT: Rights and Title Inte
- Page 35 and 36: DRAFT REPORT: Rights and Title Inte
- Page 37 and 38: DRAFT REPORT: Rights and Title Inte
- Page 39 and 40: DRAFT REPORT: Rights and Title Inte
- Page 41 and 42: DRAFT REPORT: Rights and Title Inte
- Page 43 and 44: DRAFT REPORT: Rights and Title Inte
- Page 45 and 46: DRAFT REPORT: Rights and Title Inte
- Page 47 and 48: DRAFT REPORT: Rights and Title Inte
- Page 49 and 50: DRAFT REPORT: Rights and Title Inte
- Page 51 and 52: DRAFT REPORT: Rights and Title Inte
- Page 53 and 54: DRAFT REPORT: Rights and Title Inte
- Page 55 and 56: DRAFT REPORT: Rights and Title Inte
- Page 57 and 58: DRAFT REPORT: Rights and Title Inte
- Page 59 and 60: DRAFT REPORT: Rights and Title Inte
- Page 61 and 62: DRAFT REPORT: Rights and Title Inte
- Page 63 and 64: DRAFT REPORT: Rights and Title Inte
- Page 65 and 66: DRAFT REPORT: Rights and Title Inte
- Page 67 and 68: DRAFT REPORT: Rights and Title Inte
3 – C<strong>on</strong>sultati<strong>on</strong> Assessment<br />
1<br />
2<br />
(e)<br />
The Project will not undergo ei<strong>the</strong>r a <strong>BC</strong> Envir<strong>on</strong>mental Assessment Act review nor<br />
a Canadian Envir<strong>on</strong>mental Assessment Act review;<br />
3<br />
4<br />
5<br />
(f)<br />
The CPCN is <strong>the</strong> major regulatory approval required to proceed with <strong>the</strong> Project<br />
and if granted, and subject to securing necessary land tenures and licenses, would<br />
allow <strong>BC</strong>TC to proceed with c<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Project;<br />
6<br />
7<br />
8<br />
9<br />
(g)<br />
The Project will require a Crown Land License <strong>of</strong> Occupati<strong>on</strong> from <strong>the</strong> Integrated<br />
Land Management Bureau (ILMB) for <strong>the</strong> transmissi<strong>on</strong> line right‐<strong>of</strong>‐way over <strong>the</strong><br />
Crown lands in <strong>the</strong> Project area. The applicati<strong>on</strong> for this license will be referred to<br />
<strong>the</strong> potentially affected <strong>First</strong> Nati<strong>on</strong>s; and<br />
10<br />
11<br />
(h)<br />
All Project assets will be owned and operated by <strong>BC</strong> <strong>Hydro</strong> and <strong>BC</strong>TC, provincial<br />
Crown Corporati<strong>on</strong>s regulated by <strong>the</strong> B.C. Utilities Commissi<strong>on</strong>.<br />
12<br />
13<br />
14<br />
15<br />
16<br />
17<br />
18<br />
19<br />
20<br />
21<br />
22<br />
23<br />
3.4 Haida Spectrum<br />
3.4.1 KNC<br />
<strong>BC</strong> <strong>Hydro</strong> is <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> view that <strong>the</strong> level <strong>of</strong> c<strong>on</strong>sultati<strong>on</strong> in respect <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> KNC and its<br />
members is probably in <strong>the</strong> medium to high range <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Haida spectrum. <strong>BC</strong> <strong>Hydro</strong>’s<br />
view is based <strong>on</strong> its preliminary assessment that (1) <strong>the</strong> claims <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> KNC member <strong>First</strong><br />
Nati<strong>on</strong>s are reas<strong>on</strong>able and (2) <strong>the</strong> Project impacts <strong>on</strong> asserted Aboriginal rights are<br />
likely to be, <strong>on</strong> balance, low to medium.<br />
3.4.2 SIB<br />
<strong>BC</strong> <strong>Hydro</strong> is <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> view that <strong>the</strong> level <strong>of</strong> c<strong>on</strong>sultati<strong>on</strong> in respect <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> SIB is probably in<br />
<strong>the</strong> medium to high range <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Haida spectrum based <strong>on</strong> <strong>BC</strong> <strong>Hydro</strong>’s preliminary<br />
assessment that (1) <strong>the</strong> claims <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> SIB are reas<strong>on</strong>able and (2) <strong>the</strong> Project impacts <strong>on</strong><br />
asserted Aboriginal rights are likely to be, <strong>on</strong> balance, low to medium.<br />
<strong>BC</strong>TC Columbia Valley Transmissi<strong>on</strong> Project – <str<strong>on</strong>g>Evidence</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> <strong>Adequacy</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>First</strong> Nati<strong>on</strong>s C<strong>on</strong>sultati<strong>on</strong> 16<br />
7 May 2010