Evidence on the Adequacy of First Nations Consultation - BC Hydro ...
Evidence on the Adequacy of First Nations Consultation - BC Hydro ... Evidence on the Adequacy of First Nations Consultation - BC Hydro ...
7 The only red-listed vertebrate confirmed in the study area is the badger. One additional step would be to avoid creating roads or pacing structures over existing burrows of badgers or their main prey Columbian Ground squirrels At the time of access construction, environmental monitors will scan the area for badgers. If a burrow is identified, appropriate mitigation measures will applied. This additional measure will be included in the construction EMP. 8 The potential presence of the bluelisted southern red-blacked vole (galei subspecies) might more appropriately be identified as "Likely" rather than "Unknown". 9 Table 5-7 identifies the least chipmunk as having been detected in the study area. 10 Olive-sided flycatchers (blue list) were recorded once in the surveys, near the northern end of the proposed route. 11 The list of garter snakes (Table 5- 10) does not mesh with expectations for this area. 12 It is not clear from the material available to my why this option B was chosen. Southern red-backed vole (galei subspecies) are listed ”Unknown” because AECOM does not have enough information to conclude otherwise. AECOM did not find any red-backed vole in the specific study area. It appears that there may have been a misidentification. AECOM cannot confirm that the rare species was present. BCTC recognizes that birds may be transient in the study area and mitigation measures have been provided in the EOA report. Rare birds could be nesting in the area, and mitigation measures as suggested in the Environmental Overview Report should reduce risks to all bird species. AECOM has good photo documentation for most of the snakes observed and would be happy to follow up with a species expert to confirm which sub-species was observed. The basis upon which Option B was identified as preferred is discussed in Section 5 of the CPCN Application (Exhibit B-1) No change in status. AECOM will issue errata to the Environmental Overview Assessment Report removing this species from the species list of confirmed mammals on site. Detailed assessment will be conducted at the time of the preparation of the construction EMP. Also, during the construction (ROW clearing and access construction) environmental monitors will survey for the nesting birds during the nesting season. No change in status. No change in status. Page 142 of 200
THE KTUNAXA NATION AND THE UPPER COLUMBIA VALLEY: A SURVEY OF HISTORICAL DOCUMENTATION AND RESEARCH RELATING TO ABORIGINAL USE AND INTEREST Prepared on behalf of the Ktunaxa Nation Council by Brian D. Robertson 2160 West 48 th Ave., Vancouver, B.C. V6M 2P5 e-mail: robertsonb@shaw.ca April, 2010 Page 143 of 200
- Page 113 and 114: BC hydro en FOR GENE RATION S Chris
- Page 115 and 116: Page 93 of 200
- Page 117 and 118: BC hydro FOR GENERATION S Chris Hea
- Page 119 and 120: BC hydro m FOR GENERATIONS Chris He
- Page 121 and 122: BC hydro m FOR GENERATIONS Chris He
- Page 123 and 124: BC hydro m FOR GENERATIONS Chris He
- Page 125 and 126: BC hydro m FOR GENERAT IONS Chris H
- Page 127 and 128: TERMS OF REFERENCE (TR) CVT - Archa
- Page 129 and 130: TERMS OF REFERENCE (TR) PART 1 - TE
- Page 131 and 132: TERMS OF REFERENCE (TR) existing ac
- Page 133 and 134: TERMS OF REFERENCE (TR) at the begi
- Page 135 and 136: J ./ FOR GENERATIONS Chris Heard BC
- Page 137 and 138: BC hgdro m FOR GENERATIONS Chris He
- Page 139 and 140: BC hydro m FOR GENERATIONS Chris He
- Page 141 and 142: BC hydr-o m FOR GENERATIONS Chris H
- Page 143 and 144: BC hydro m FOR GENERATIONS Chris He
- Page 145 and 146: BC hydro m FOR GENERATIONS Chris He
- Page 147 and 148: BC hgdro m FOR GENERATIONS Chris He
- Page 149 and 150: BC hudro m FOR GENERATIONS Chris He
- Page 151 and 152: BC hgdr-o m FOR GENERATIONS Chris H
- Page 153 and 154: Page 127 of 200
- Page 155 and 156: KTUNAXA NATION COUNCIL BCTC RESPONS
- Page 157 and 158: KTUNAXA NATION COUNCIL BCTC RESPONS
- Page 159 and 160: 3 Section 4.4.2.1 Canyon Creek- Rep
- Page 161 and 162: 3, 4 & 5 Just north of the Frances
- Page 163: Wildlife and Wildlife Habitat 1 The
- Page 167 and 168: THE KTUNAXA NATION AND THE UPPER CO
- Page 169 and 170: 3. APPROACH OF THIS STUDY The main
- Page 171 and 172: BEC: ICH only; wet and cool Wildlif
- Page 173 and 174: Figure 2. Traditional territory of
- Page 175 and 176: The Inissimi Complex was defined fo
- Page 177 and 178: Another group of Ktunaxa, the Qatmu
- Page 179 and 180: Perhaps the greatest of these impac
- Page 181 and 182: The first trading post in Ktunaxa t
- Page 183 and 184: the Tobacco Plains area for three m
- Page 185 and 186: Callesauilk [Upper Kootenays] 91 12
- Page 187 and 188: Kinbaskit, the Chief, who is nearly
- Page 189 and 190: little in the way of fresh insights
- Page 191 and 192: three of their children including F
- Page 193 and 194: Although these accounts confirm tha
- Page 195 and 196: Fig. 4 - From Flanagan’s Indian T
- Page 197 and 198: 12. ETHNOGRAPHIC ASSESSMENTS OF TER
- Page 199 and 200: 2. James Teit Around the turn of th
- Page 201 and 202: Another example comes from a map as
- Page 203 and 204: The Columbia Lakes moved down the C
- Page 205 and 206: 9. Ktunaxa Territory, according to
- Page 207 and 208: Salmon played an important part in
- Page 209 and 210: 6. Allan Smith In 1984, on behalf o
- Page 211 and 212: 6. Randy Bouchard and Dorothy Kenne
- Page 213 and 214: BIBLIOGRAPHY for KTUNAXA AIUS -THE
7 The <strong>on</strong>ly red-listed vertebrate<br />
c<strong>on</strong>firmed in <strong>the</strong> study area is <strong>the</strong><br />
badger. One additi<strong>on</strong>al step would<br />
be to avoid creating roads or<br />
pacing structures over existing<br />
burrows <strong>of</strong> badgers or <strong>the</strong>ir main<br />
prey Columbian Ground squirrels<br />
At <strong>the</strong> time <strong>of</strong> access c<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong>, envir<strong>on</strong>mental m<strong>on</strong>itors will scan <strong>the</strong><br />
area for badgers. If a burrow is identified, appropriate mitigati<strong>on</strong> measures<br />
will applied.<br />
This additi<strong>on</strong>al measure will be<br />
included in <strong>the</strong> c<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong> EMP.<br />
8 The potential presence <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> bluelisted<br />
sou<strong>the</strong>rn red-blacked vole<br />
(galei subspecies) might more<br />
appropriately be identified as<br />
"Likely" ra<strong>the</strong>r than "Unknown".<br />
9 Table 5-7 identifies <strong>the</strong> least<br />
chipmunk as having been detected<br />
in <strong>the</strong> study area.<br />
10 Olive-sided flycatchers (blue list)<br />
were recorded <strong>on</strong>ce in <strong>the</strong> surveys,<br />
near <strong>the</strong> nor<strong>the</strong>rn end <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
proposed route.<br />
11 The list <strong>of</strong> garter snakes (Table 5-<br />
10) does not mesh with<br />
expectati<strong>on</strong>s for this area.<br />
12 It is not clear from <strong>the</strong> material<br />
available to my why this opti<strong>on</strong> B<br />
was chosen.<br />
Sou<strong>the</strong>rn red-backed vole (galei subspecies) are listed<br />
”Unknown” because AECOM does not have enough informati<strong>on</strong> to<br />
c<strong>on</strong>clude o<strong>the</strong>rwise. AECOM did not find any red-backed vole in <strong>the</strong> specific<br />
study area.<br />
It appears that <strong>the</strong>re may have been a misidentificati<strong>on</strong>. AECOM cannot<br />
c<strong>on</strong>firm that <strong>the</strong> rare species was present.<br />
<strong>BC</strong>TC recognizes that birds may be transient in <strong>the</strong> study area and<br />
mitigati<strong>on</strong> measures have been provided in <strong>the</strong> EOA report.<br />
Rare birds could be nesting in <strong>the</strong> area, and mitigati<strong>on</strong> measures as<br />
suggested in <strong>the</strong> Envir<strong>on</strong>mental Overview Report should reduce risks to all<br />
bird species.<br />
AECOM has good photo documentati<strong>on</strong> for most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> snakes observed<br />
and would be happy to follow up with a species expert to c<strong>on</strong>firm which<br />
sub-species was observed.<br />
The basis up<strong>on</strong> which Opti<strong>on</strong> B was identified as preferred is discussed in<br />
Secti<strong>on</strong> 5 <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> CPCN Applicati<strong>on</strong> (Exhibit B-1)<br />
No change in status.<br />
AECOM will issue errata to <strong>the</strong><br />
Envir<strong>on</strong>mental Overview Assessment<br />
Report removing this species from <strong>the</strong><br />
species list <strong>of</strong> c<strong>on</strong>firmed mammals <strong>on</strong><br />
site.<br />
Detailed assessment will be<br />
c<strong>on</strong>ducted at <strong>the</strong> time <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
preparati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> c<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong> EMP.<br />
Also, during <strong>the</strong> c<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong> (ROW<br />
clearing and access c<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong>)<br />
envir<strong>on</strong>mental m<strong>on</strong>itors will survey for<br />
<strong>the</strong> nesting birds during <strong>the</strong> nesting<br />
seas<strong>on</strong>.<br />
No change in status.<br />
No change in status.<br />
Page 142 <strong>of</strong> 200