Evidence on the Adequacy of First Nations Consultation - BC Hydro ...

3 – Consultation Assessment
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Interest” (B.D. Robertson). A copy of this report is included in Appendix A. The
Robertson report is largely a detailed literature review. BC Hydro has not had sufficient
time to review the report in detail and assess the merits of the opinions or findings in
the report. However, BC Hydro has considered the report in its strength of claim
analysis.
The Robertson report supports BC Hydro’s preliminary assessment that the KNC
probably has reasonable aboriginal rights claims in the Project area, particularly in terms
of seasonal hunting and fishing activities.
3.1.2 SIB
The entire Project is located within the asserted traditional territory of the SIB, and a
portion of the transmission will be in the proximity of the SIB reserve. BC Hydro and the
SIB have signed a Benefits Agreement and a Contracting Agreement with the SIB, and
the SIB acknowledges that it has been adequately consulted and accommodated. BC
Hydro is therefore of the view that it is not necessary to engage in a detailed strength of
claim analysis in respect of the SIB. BC Hydro is of the view that the SIB has a reasonable
claim.
3.1.3 Other SNTC
BC Hydro acknowledges that other SNTC member First Nations have asserted interests
in the area. However, BC Hydro is of the view that their claims are comparatively
weaker. A number of these bands have provided letters of confirmation of support to
the SIB regarding the SIB’s relationship with the Project.
3.1.4 SALD
In the specific context of SALD, BC Hydro is of the view the asserted claims are
comparatively weaker.
BCTC Columbia Valley Transmission Project – <strong>Evidence</strong> on Adequacy of First Nations Consultation 13
7 May 2010