TOMORROW'S ROADS TODAY - Maryland State Highway ...
TOMORROW'S ROADS TODAY - Maryland State Highway ...
TOMORROW'S ROADS TODAY - Maryland State Highway ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
40<br />
and <strong>Maryland</strong>. <strong>Maryland</strong>’s initial portion would be thirty-three miles long in Prince George’s<br />
and Montgomery counties. In addition to a four lane highway separated by a median and<br />
interchanges with the radial roads, the highway would require two bridges, one at the south end<br />
of the highway between Oxon Hill, <strong>Maryland</strong> and Alexandria, Virginia and the second between<br />
Cabin John, <strong>Maryland</strong> and Langley, Virginia. Shortly after the meeting, the SRC hired the<br />
engineering firm of Michael Baker, Jr. of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania to oversee the construction of<br />
the Capital Beltway. Although Baker was not a <strong>Maryland</strong> engineering firm, it was one of thirty<br />
firms that received contracts with the SRC to complete certain projects that were included in the<br />
Twelve-Year Plan. 68<br />
While design planning continued, the SRC first began to improve the radial roads which<br />
had become state highways once they passed into <strong>Maryland</strong> in Montgomery and Prince George’s<br />
counties. The first road to be improved was MD 97, Georgia Avenue, which was rebuilt as an<br />
urban, two-lane highway in 1952, In 1955 and 1956, the SRC Report noted that Columbia Pike<br />
(US 29), New Hampshire Avenue (MD 650), and Branch Avenue (MD 5) had all been dualized<br />
in anticipation of connecting the circumferential routes, particularly the Capital Beltway. 69 By<br />
1960, the SRC programmed $75,000,000 in the two counties to complete extending the radial<br />
roads to the Beltway.<br />
In 1955, the SRC began construction of the circumferential highway between the Indian<br />
Head <strong>Highway</strong> (MD 210) and the Palmer <strong>Highway</strong> (MD 704) in Prince George’s County. At the<br />
same time, the Capital Beltway’s construction in Montgomery County also began in 1955<br />
starting with the Cedar Lane overpass east of Wisconsin Avenue. This segment of the highway<br />
was rather controversial because it passed through the <strong>Maryland</strong> portion of the Rock Creek Park<br />
which in the District of Columbia is a federal park, purchased with funding from the Capper-<br />
Crampton Act of 1930. In <strong>Maryland</strong>, the M-NCPPC purchased portions of the park lands using<br />
the Capper-Crampton Act funding, although the county agency also received state funds for park<br />
land purchases. Local residents living in Chevy Chase near the highway opposed construction of<br />
the Beltway through the park because of the damage to the trees, as well as the potential damage<br />
to the residential property values. Many of the opponents were among Washington’s political<br />
and business elite, unlike the residents in Prince George’s County near the Indian Head and<br />
Palmer highways. Although their objections were considered, the county and federal agencies,<br />
the M-NCPPC and the National Capital Planning Commission (NCPC), overruled their<br />
objections and agreed to allow the SRC to construct the highway. 70<br />
The SRC completed construction of the 1.5 mile segment of the highway near Wisconsin<br />
Avenue in 1957. By then, other portions of the highway had been constructed between<br />
Wisconsin Avenue in Montgomery County and Kenilworth Avenue in Prince George’s County,<br />
but it was not complete. Governor McKeldin and his wife both cut ribbons to celebrate the<br />
68 Jeremy Louis Korr, Washington Main Street: Consensus and Conflict on the Capital Beltway, 1952-<br />
2001,University of <strong>Maryland</strong>, College Park, MD (2002), p. 111, <strong>State</strong> Roads Commission of <strong>Maryland</strong>; Report of<br />
the <strong>State</strong> Roads Commission of <strong>Maryland</strong>, 1955-1956, Baltimore, MD: 1956, p. 11<br />
69 <strong>State</strong> Roads Commission of <strong>Maryland</strong>, Report of the <strong>State</strong> Roads Commission of <strong>Maryland</strong>, 1951-1952, Baltimore,<br />
MD: 1952, p. 137; and <strong>State</strong> Roads Commission of <strong>Maryland</strong>, Report of the <strong>State</strong> Roads Commission of <strong>Maryland</strong>,<br />
1955-1956, Baltimore, MD: 1952, p. 147.<br />
70 Op. cit., pp. 126, 152 and 180-182