03.03.2015 Views

TOMORROW'S ROADS TODAY - Maryland State Highway ...

TOMORROW'S ROADS TODAY - Maryland State Highway ...

TOMORROW'S ROADS TODAY - Maryland State Highway ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

40<br />

and <strong>Maryland</strong>. <strong>Maryland</strong>’s initial portion would be thirty-three miles long in Prince George’s<br />

and Montgomery counties. In addition to a four lane highway separated by a median and<br />

interchanges with the radial roads, the highway would require two bridges, one at the south end<br />

of the highway between Oxon Hill, <strong>Maryland</strong> and Alexandria, Virginia and the second between<br />

Cabin John, <strong>Maryland</strong> and Langley, Virginia. Shortly after the meeting, the SRC hired the<br />

engineering firm of Michael Baker, Jr. of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania to oversee the construction of<br />

the Capital Beltway. Although Baker was not a <strong>Maryland</strong> engineering firm, it was one of thirty<br />

firms that received contracts with the SRC to complete certain projects that were included in the<br />

Twelve-Year Plan. 68<br />

While design planning continued, the SRC first began to improve the radial roads which<br />

had become state highways once they passed into <strong>Maryland</strong> in Montgomery and Prince George’s<br />

counties. The first road to be improved was MD 97, Georgia Avenue, which was rebuilt as an<br />

urban, two-lane highway in 1952, In 1955 and 1956, the SRC Report noted that Columbia Pike<br />

(US 29), New Hampshire Avenue (MD 650), and Branch Avenue (MD 5) had all been dualized<br />

in anticipation of connecting the circumferential routes, particularly the Capital Beltway. 69 By<br />

1960, the SRC programmed $75,000,000 in the two counties to complete extending the radial<br />

roads to the Beltway.<br />

In 1955, the SRC began construction of the circumferential highway between the Indian<br />

Head <strong>Highway</strong> (MD 210) and the Palmer <strong>Highway</strong> (MD 704) in Prince George’s County. At the<br />

same time, the Capital Beltway’s construction in Montgomery County also began in 1955<br />

starting with the Cedar Lane overpass east of Wisconsin Avenue. This segment of the highway<br />

was rather controversial because it passed through the <strong>Maryland</strong> portion of the Rock Creek Park<br />

which in the District of Columbia is a federal park, purchased with funding from the Capper-<br />

Crampton Act of 1930. In <strong>Maryland</strong>, the M-NCPPC purchased portions of the park lands using<br />

the Capper-Crampton Act funding, although the county agency also received state funds for park<br />

land purchases. Local residents living in Chevy Chase near the highway opposed construction of<br />

the Beltway through the park because of the damage to the trees, as well as the potential damage<br />

to the residential property values. Many of the opponents were among Washington’s political<br />

and business elite, unlike the residents in Prince George’s County near the Indian Head and<br />

Palmer highways. Although their objections were considered, the county and federal agencies,<br />

the M-NCPPC and the National Capital Planning Commission (NCPC), overruled their<br />

objections and agreed to allow the SRC to construct the highway. 70<br />

The SRC completed construction of the 1.5 mile segment of the highway near Wisconsin<br />

Avenue in 1957. By then, other portions of the highway had been constructed between<br />

Wisconsin Avenue in Montgomery County and Kenilworth Avenue in Prince George’s County,<br />

but it was not complete. Governor McKeldin and his wife both cut ribbons to celebrate the<br />

68 Jeremy Louis Korr, Washington Main Street: Consensus and Conflict on the Capital Beltway, 1952-<br />

2001,University of <strong>Maryland</strong>, College Park, MD (2002), p. 111, <strong>State</strong> Roads Commission of <strong>Maryland</strong>; Report of<br />

the <strong>State</strong> Roads Commission of <strong>Maryland</strong>, 1955-1956, Baltimore, MD: 1956, p. 11<br />

69 <strong>State</strong> Roads Commission of <strong>Maryland</strong>, Report of the <strong>State</strong> Roads Commission of <strong>Maryland</strong>, 1951-1952, Baltimore,<br />

MD: 1952, p. 137; and <strong>State</strong> Roads Commission of <strong>Maryland</strong>, Report of the <strong>State</strong> Roads Commission of <strong>Maryland</strong>,<br />

1955-1956, Baltimore, MD: 1952, p. 147.<br />

70 Op. cit., pp. 126, 152 and 180-182

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!