03.03.2015 Views

TOMORROW'S ROADS TODAY - Maryland State Highway ...

TOMORROW'S ROADS TODAY - Maryland State Highway ...

TOMORROW'S ROADS TODAY - Maryland State Highway ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

19<br />

As the SRC finalized the bridges’ construction in September 1940, a new study<br />

anticipating the state’s highway needs between 1941 and 1960 was completed by the agency.<br />

<strong>Maryland</strong> <strong>Highway</strong> Needs, 1941-1960, A Report of the <strong>State</strong>-wide <strong>Highway</strong> Planning Survey<br />

concluded that a dedicated source of funding for future road construction was necessary in order<br />

to meet the growing traffic demands throughout the state. 23 As traffic numbers showed, the<br />

difficult economic conditions in the late 1930s did not reduce the number of cars and trucks on<br />

the state’s highways each year. On US 1 between 1928 and 1932, traffic had increased more<br />

than fifty percent in four years or more than ten percent per year. In other areas of the state,<br />

traffic also continued to increase. On the Eastern Shore, Ocean City attracted more visitors each<br />

year, which increased traffic on the highway to the resort (now US 50, previously MD 213).<br />

Boosters of the Ocean <strong>Highway</strong>, US 13, publicized the road as a quick route from New York<br />

City to Florida because it avoided the traffic in Baltimore and Washington, DC, as well as<br />

Richmond, Virginia. Although the Governor and General Assembly supported the dedicated<br />

funding and new roads, other issues including the start of World War II prevented the SRC from<br />

receiving adequate funding to build a new highway system.<br />

Interregional <strong>Highway</strong>s<br />

The interregional highway system question again came to the forefront in 1941.<br />

Roosevelt appointed the National Interregional <strong>Highway</strong> Commission to further develop the<br />

1938 interregional plan and address nationwide traffic congestion. Roosevelt and other Federal<br />

and <strong>State</strong> officials also expected that once the war ended, unemployment rates would rise. They<br />

saw highway construction as a way to create jobs for returning soldiers. The SRC used<br />

Baltimore’s proximity to Washington, DC to study some of the traffic problems that would be a<br />

concern in any new national highway plan. Although the SRC made plans for civilian uses,<br />

America’s entry into World War II highlighted the defense aspects of the plan. Many<br />

<strong>Maryland</strong>ers hoped for a better road than US 1 between Baltimore and Washington. At the time<br />

Federal officials were more concerned about war preparations, as the BPR’s Administrator<br />

Thomas H. MacDonald noted during a March 13, 1941 interview with The Baltimore Evening<br />

Sun, <strong>Maryland</strong> needed new roads for its defense industry and military access more than a new<br />

expressway between Baltimore and Washington. 24<br />

23 <strong>State</strong> Roads Commission of <strong>Maryland</strong>, <strong>Maryland</strong> <strong>Highway</strong> Needs, 1941-1960, A Report of the <strong>State</strong>-wide<br />

<strong>Highway</strong> Planning Survey, Baltimore, MD (1940);<br />

24 The Baltimore Evening Sun, “Baltimore Itself Is Bottleneck in <strong>Highway</strong> Plans, Say Experts,” March 13, 1941,<br />

<strong>Maryland</strong> Department, Enoch Pratt Free Library

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!