Should You Consider Using A Forex ECN Platform? - MB Trading
Should You Consider Using A Forex ECN Platform? - MB Trading
Should You Consider Using A Forex ECN Platform? - MB Trading
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
RETAIL e-FX CLIENT<br />
in late 2007, when more clients started to demand a<br />
real <strong>ECN</strong> execution delivered on the MT4.<br />
Fastbrokers.com concluded that clean bridging seemed<br />
to work only in theory. Zagara says: “It is a very tough<br />
task to achieve in a live environment, mainly for the<br />
nature of the MT4 infrastructure, where its core, in<br />
my opinion, is mainly designed for a dealing desk<br />
usage only. Furthermore, each <strong>ECN</strong> has is own trading<br />
and order rules, different API specification and FIXcommunication<br />
issues. Our tests reported problems<br />
with split fills (which MT4 wasn’t able to handle), off<br />
quotes caused by latency (trades were passed while the<br />
price on the <strong>ECN</strong> had changed), which made possible<br />
the use of a bridge in a hybrid model but it was not<br />
possible to make it work in a true STP-only model.<br />
“For that purpose we dismissed the MT4-<strong>ECN</strong><br />
project and switched to focus our custom software<br />
to fill this gap,” explains Zagara. “I am sure now<br />
things have changed; there are different and more<br />
powerful bridges. However, in my opinion, I am still<br />
very sceptical when I see a broker claiming is offering<br />
an MT4 through an <strong>ECN</strong>. I would scrutinise both<br />
the bridge and whether the <strong>ECN</strong> it connects to was<br />
specifically designed or modified to handle MT4-like<br />
platforms, to the extent that the benefits of a regular<br />
<strong>ECN</strong> may have been compromised to accommodate<br />
the needs of MT4,” he warns.<br />
Ross Ditlove<br />
“There are now a lot of brokers that claim to be FX <strong>ECN</strong>s<br />
with MT4, but we review what they are claiming and know<br />
that at best, they are simply routing orders out to one<br />
destination and again failing the transparency test.”<br />
Richards adds: “There have been many challenges<br />
getting this marriage to work. As, in my opinion,<br />
the MT4 software was never really meant to execute<br />
through an <strong>ECN</strong>. Currenex, through its executable<br />
streaming prices model, is another company making<br />
headway in retail <strong>ECN</strong> trading. If a broker signs on<br />
with Currenex they will have true STP-NDD accounts<br />
available for their clients,” he claims.<br />
<strong>ECN</strong> or not <strong>ECN</strong>?<br />
On what factors may ultimately govern whether a trader<br />
should consider using a forex <strong>ECN</strong> platform or not,<br />
Zagara states that while some traders, when delivered a<br />
true <strong>ECN</strong> product, enjoy the liquidity and volatility of<br />
these feeds, they are sometimes quickly overwhelmed<br />
not only by the commission charges, lower leverage,<br />
and higher balance required, but especially with the less<br />
user friendly trading platforms that allow you to trade<br />
on it. Zagara comments: “That reason led us to develop<br />
Pathfinder Trader, which includes trading on different<br />
<strong>ECN</strong>’s but delivered on a front end with the most<br />
advanced features, such as, powerful charting, auto<br />
execution, back testing, pattern recognition, and any<br />
other advanced functionality you would expect from a<br />
modern trading platform.”<br />
Vedikhin comments: “At Alpari (UK) we believe that<br />
over 95% of forex retail trading will go through <strong>ECN</strong>’s<br />
within the next five years, but there are some obstacles<br />
in the way. The first is that <strong>ECN</strong> trading is often too<br />
expensive for the majority of retail traders. Account<br />
opening requirements are usually much steeper<br />
compared to traditional FX trading, while leverage<br />
is much lower. The other obstacle is complexity.<br />
<strong>ECN</strong>’s often come across as too complicated and<br />
‘institutional’ for retail traders. We believe that over<br />
time <strong>ECN</strong> trading will become progressively simpler<br />
as users become more informed and educated about<br />
its potential. Cost of entry and complexity are both<br />
obstacles that can be overcome.”<br />
While Ditlove notes: “We would obviously argue<br />
that not using a true <strong>ECN</strong> platform is at some point<br />
detrimental to the trader, but there are still people who<br />
view it differently. Our goal is to have a transparent<br />
display system that prohibits games, and for some<br />
people that have been around a while, the importance<br />
of that is lost. Can they make the argument that with<br />
a fixed spread, no-commission model it is easier to<br />
know what you’re getting? Maybe. Is it cost effective<br />
and better in the end? I would question whether that<br />
is the case. Simply stated, transparency in a market<br />
place brings efficiency and efficiency brings value.”<br />
134 | april 2010 e-FOREX