02.03.2015 Views

Should You Consider Using A Forex ECN Platform? - MB Trading

Should You Consider Using A Forex ECN Platform? - MB Trading

Should You Consider Using A Forex ECN Platform? - MB Trading

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

RETAIL e-FX CLIENT<br />

in late 2007, when more clients started to demand a<br />

real <strong>ECN</strong> execution delivered on the MT4.<br />

Fastbrokers.com concluded that clean bridging seemed<br />

to work only in theory. Zagara says: “It is a very tough<br />

task to achieve in a live environment, mainly for the<br />

nature of the MT4 infrastructure, where its core, in<br />

my opinion, is mainly designed for a dealing desk<br />

usage only. Furthermore, each <strong>ECN</strong> has is own trading<br />

and order rules, different API specification and FIXcommunication<br />

issues. Our tests reported problems<br />

with split fills (which MT4 wasn’t able to handle), off<br />

quotes caused by latency (trades were passed while the<br />

price on the <strong>ECN</strong> had changed), which made possible<br />

the use of a bridge in a hybrid model but it was not<br />

possible to make it work in a true STP-only model.<br />

“For that purpose we dismissed the MT4-<strong>ECN</strong><br />

project and switched to focus our custom software<br />

to fill this gap,” explains Zagara. “I am sure now<br />

things have changed; there are different and more<br />

powerful bridges. However, in my opinion, I am still<br />

very sceptical when I see a broker claiming is offering<br />

an MT4 through an <strong>ECN</strong>. I would scrutinise both<br />

the bridge and whether the <strong>ECN</strong> it connects to was<br />

specifically designed or modified to handle MT4-like<br />

platforms, to the extent that the benefits of a regular<br />

<strong>ECN</strong> may have been compromised to accommodate<br />

the needs of MT4,” he warns.<br />

Ross Ditlove<br />

“There are now a lot of brokers that claim to be FX <strong>ECN</strong>s<br />

with MT4, but we review what they are claiming and know<br />

that at best, they are simply routing orders out to one<br />

destination and again failing the transparency test.”<br />

Richards adds: “There have been many challenges<br />

getting this marriage to work. As, in my opinion,<br />

the MT4 software was never really meant to execute<br />

through an <strong>ECN</strong>. Currenex, through its executable<br />

streaming prices model, is another company making<br />

headway in retail <strong>ECN</strong> trading. If a broker signs on<br />

with Currenex they will have true STP-NDD accounts<br />

available for their clients,” he claims.<br />

<strong>ECN</strong> or not <strong>ECN</strong>?<br />

On what factors may ultimately govern whether a trader<br />

should consider using a forex <strong>ECN</strong> platform or not,<br />

Zagara states that while some traders, when delivered a<br />

true <strong>ECN</strong> product, enjoy the liquidity and volatility of<br />

these feeds, they are sometimes quickly overwhelmed<br />

not only by the commission charges, lower leverage,<br />

and higher balance required, but especially with the less<br />

user friendly trading platforms that allow you to trade<br />

on it. Zagara comments: “That reason led us to develop<br />

Pathfinder Trader, which includes trading on different<br />

<strong>ECN</strong>’s but delivered on a front end with the most<br />

advanced features, such as, powerful charting, auto<br />

execution, back testing, pattern recognition, and any<br />

other advanced functionality you would expect from a<br />

modern trading platform.”<br />

Vedikhin comments: “At Alpari (UK) we believe that<br />

over 95% of forex retail trading will go through <strong>ECN</strong>’s<br />

within the next five years, but there are some obstacles<br />

in the way. The first is that <strong>ECN</strong> trading is often too<br />

expensive for the majority of retail traders. Account<br />

opening requirements are usually much steeper<br />

compared to traditional FX trading, while leverage<br />

is much lower. The other obstacle is complexity.<br />

<strong>ECN</strong>’s often come across as too complicated and<br />

‘institutional’ for retail traders. We believe that over<br />

time <strong>ECN</strong> trading will become progressively simpler<br />

as users become more informed and educated about<br />

its potential. Cost of entry and complexity are both<br />

obstacles that can be overcome.”<br />

While Ditlove notes: “We would obviously argue<br />

that not using a true <strong>ECN</strong> platform is at some point<br />

detrimental to the trader, but there are still people who<br />

view it differently. Our goal is to have a transparent<br />

display system that prohibits games, and for some<br />

people that have been around a while, the importance<br />

of that is lost. Can they make the argument that with<br />

a fixed spread, no-commission model it is easier to<br />

know what you’re getting? Maybe. Is it cost effective<br />

and better in the end? I would question whether that<br />

is the case. Simply stated, transparency in a market<br />

place brings efficiency and efficiency brings value.”<br />

134 | april 2010 e-FOREX

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!