02.03.2015 Views

Should You Consider Using A Forex ECN Platform? - MB Trading

Should You Consider Using A Forex ECN Platform? - MB Trading

Should You Consider Using A Forex ECN Platform? - MB Trading

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

RETAIL e-FX CLIENT >>><br />

Sanjaq continues: “I believe that brokers who are<br />

offering both DD and NDD are actually DD brokers<br />

trying to catch the trend by promoting NDD trading<br />

for their clients. The DD-NDD dilemma is ethical<br />

and can not be taken as a variety of services. Since an<br />

<strong>ECN</strong> broker’s role is to give individual traders access<br />

to the interbank market, they do not benefit from<br />

the spreads or the losses of their clients. Therefore,<br />

they usually charge a commission fee per transaction<br />

proportional to the trade size. Besides, banks<br />

usually charge the <strong>ECN</strong> broker commission fees for<br />

transaction executed on their end.”<br />

Wolf in sheep’s clothing?<br />

While Ditlove comments: “This is an example of<br />

a wolf in sheep’s clothing. If your broker does not<br />

immediately display your bid or offer for all other<br />

clients to see, if your broker maintains minimum<br />

fixed spreads, if your broker knows information about<br />

your order that is not fully transparent to the rest of<br />

the marketplace and retail traders alike, then you’re<br />

not getting a fair deal. Just because someone calls<br />

themselves a NDD-<strong>ECN</strong> does not make them so.<br />

Frankly, it’s laughable.”<br />

Yet the debate about dealing desks and non dealing<br />

desks (NDD) is a red herring, claims Glenn Stevens,<br />

CEO at GAIN Capital. He says as a retail trader, your<br />

Andrey Vedikhin<br />

“While approximately only 5% of retail clients<br />

trade via <strong>ECN</strong>s today, we expect this to grow to<br />

over 95% within the next few years.”<br />

primary concern should be your ability to get into a<br />

trade quickly and at the rate you request, and where<br />

your orders are filled. These things can positively or<br />

negatively impact your trading results; where your<br />

order is ultimately routed does not.<br />

Stevens explains: “Our belief is that NDD’s came<br />

about in response to complaints about the poor<br />

execution quality at some of the retail brokerages.<br />

Promoting themselves as a NDD was a way for<br />

brokers that entered the market late to differentiate<br />

themselves. It’s fairly well known that when the first<br />

NDD firms came on the scene there were several<br />

firms with poor reputations for execution, especially<br />

where they filled their client’s stop loss orders. Also,<br />

some brokers prefer the NDD model because it’s<br />

much easier to take a price feed from a bank, mark<br />

it up to the retail customers, then push all the trades<br />

back to the bank, than to act as a MM and manage<br />

risk internally while providing the best client dealing<br />

experience possible.”<br />

Continuing, Stevens states that GAIN Capital believes<br />

an experienced, professional trading desk is the real<br />

benefit to its retail clients at FOREX.com. “We don’t<br />

have an arm’s length relationship with our clients; we<br />

take full responsibility for the prices we quote and<br />

where we fill orders.”<br />

Conflict of interest<br />

In a pricing basis model, also known as a MM model,<br />

the prices are streamed from data vendors directly<br />

to the client terminals. Clients perform trades on<br />

the streamed prices, but the trades reach a dead end,<br />

which is the MM’s servers. Meanwhile, the dealers<br />

of the MM are trying to negotiate execution for the<br />

favour of the MM and to minimise the profitability<br />

of their clients. Sanjaq states this model creates a<br />

huge conflict of interest between the broker and their<br />

clients, as the loss of the client is considered as pure<br />

profit for the broker.<br />

He states: “As a client trading on MM’s platform,<br />

when you are buying a currency pair, the MM is<br />

your counterparty (selling to you). Therefore, if your<br />

buying order goes in profit of $1000 for example, it<br />

means that the MM is losing $1000. It’s as simple as<br />

that, unless the MM has a risk management policy<br />

that it applies to offset your order with a different<br />

counterparty at a certain point. Slippage and<br />

requotes are techniques used by MMs to minimise<br />

the profitability of the client. Scalping is usually not<br />

allowed by MMs because it gives the client higher<br />

128 | april 2010 e-FOREX

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!