26.02.2015 Views

Auditor General's Report on the Public Accounts of Montserrat 2004

Auditor General's Report on the Public Accounts of Montserrat 2004

Auditor General's Report on the Public Accounts of Montserrat 2004

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Revenue<br />

175. The positive variance <strong>of</strong> $11,000 resulted from a combinati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

increased completed audits and minimal price increases.<br />

5.6 Outputs <str<strong>on</strong>g>Report</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

176. For <strong>the</strong> financial year ending 31 December <strong>2004</strong>, we audited:<br />

a) An aggregate <strong>of</strong> over $122M in government revenues and<br />

expenditures.<br />

b) Twenty-two statements included in <strong>the</strong> <strong>Public</strong> <strong>Accounts</strong>. These audits<br />

focused <strong>on</strong> examinati<strong>on</strong>s <strong>of</strong> revenue and expenditure, and verificati<strong>on</strong><br />

<strong>of</strong> assets and liabilities.<br />

c) Ten Ministries and Departments <strong>of</strong> Central Government with twentytwo<br />

accounting units.<br />

d) Four o<strong>the</strong>r financial statements.<br />

e) The pre-audit <strong>of</strong> pensi<strong>on</strong> and gratuity calculati<strong>on</strong>s. This activity<br />

included <strong>the</strong> audit <strong>of</strong> pensi<strong>on</strong> and gratuity calculati<strong>on</strong>s for mainstream<br />

Civil Servants, nurses, teachers, police and members <strong>of</strong> Parliament.<br />

5.7 Outcomes <str<strong>on</strong>g>Report</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

177. As part <strong>of</strong> our accountability regime, we have decided to measure <strong>the</strong><br />

impact <strong>of</strong> our audits <strong>on</strong> improving managerial stewardship and increasing<br />

effectiveness and efficiency <strong>of</strong> audited entities. Our Outcomes <str<strong>on</strong>g>Report</str<strong>on</strong>g> is<br />

<strong>the</strong>refore based <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> level <strong>of</strong> uptake <strong>of</strong> our recommendati<strong>on</strong>s.<br />

LEVEL OF UPTAKE OF OUR FORMAL<br />

RECOMMENDATIONS (Annual Audits) Number %<br />

Total number <strong>of</strong> recommendati<strong>on</strong>s (from sample <strong>of</strong> 22 entities) 91 100<br />

Number <strong>of</strong> recommendati<strong>on</strong>s accepted 72 79<br />

Number <strong>of</strong> recommendati<strong>on</strong>s rejected 0 0<br />

Number noted or under c<strong>on</strong>siderati<strong>on</strong> by management 2 2<br />

Number where client has made no resp<strong>on</strong>se 17 19<br />

178. Our findings indicate that 79% <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> recommendati<strong>on</strong>s we made in<br />

<strong>the</strong> management reports <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> fiscal year <strong>2004</strong> were implemented. 2%<br />

were ei<strong>the</strong>r noted or under active c<strong>on</strong>siderati<strong>on</strong> by management. Although<br />

41

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!